LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Originally Posted by A/G
Do you think a thread of this nature would develop if there was an legitimate comparo availableat this time?
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Originally Posted by tireburnin
Settle down. It's about heads/cam not name calling or insinuations.
And as for specing cams that make 390rwtq...your a bit behind the curve (I can make puns too!). My Ai nitrous cam made 390rwtq (in a 355 6spd) almost a year and a half ago. If thier cams are so inferior to yours/LE spec'd cams, how is that possible? For every 1 car that you've had hit 390+ rwtq, how many have only made in the high 370s to low 380s? How many of your 390-400 cars are strokers?
And as for specing cams that make 390rwtq...your a bit behind the curve (I can make puns too!). My Ai nitrous cam made 390rwtq (in a 355 6spd) almost a year and a half ago. If thier cams are so inferior to yours/LE spec'd cams, how is that possible? For every 1 car that you've had hit 390+ rwtq, how many have only made in the high 370s to low 380s? How many of your 390-400 cars are strokers?
A 355 can easily make 10ft lbs more TQ since you can tweak so many little things to get that for you that you can't in a stock bottom end. When I'm talking about that TQ range it's about the stock cube cars, not strokers. All you have to do is look around to notice that the strokers are much higher than that.
cmroSS97 "i think the last bre/le 383 car made about 428 rwtq.......fwiw"
Bret
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
If you have an issue with my posts, don't read them. I skip yours regularly.
I love how I get you guys all rilled up. If you didn't really reguard me as something to care about you wouldn't even care..... lol
Last edited by SStrokerAce; May 15, 2006 at 12:43 PM.
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
wow...this is crazy...My cam is at least a 8 year old off the shelf grind..anyone up to sending me a new one? The only "custom" part of my cam is I told them to put it on a 110 instead of a 106...I wanted it to be a street car back then..lol.
Joe..nice to see ya around.
As far as the heads go, I've seen good results out of both camps. I'm not sure if LE has had anyone go full out on his setup but I know of one that is close. In a car that is Set up for nitrous he is prolly going to bust into the 10s soon. Runs 9s on the jug right now. I'm not sure what cam he has but I think its a 306...could be wrong though. As stated elsewhere here a cnc is a good way to put out a consistant head. I don't think it will be a max effort head though. Look at any of the really good performing cars out there(above your average guy with same setup) and you will see a set of hand finished heads. I know some people will start with a set of cncs just to knock off alot of the meat off then go in and hand finish the setup. I've also seen cnc heads that are all over the board on port to port flow..so don't think they are all perfect. But..same goes for hand done heads..I've seen ports vary as much as 30 cfm. I agree with LE though in that if your looking for a good running car you will be satisfied with heads from either shop. .
Joe..nice to see ya around.
As far as the heads go, I've seen good results out of both camps. I'm not sure if LE has had anyone go full out on his setup but I know of one that is close. In a car that is Set up for nitrous he is prolly going to bust into the 10s soon. Runs 9s on the jug right now. I'm not sure what cam he has but I think its a 306...could be wrong though. As stated elsewhere here a cnc is a good way to put out a consistant head. I don't think it will be a max effort head though. Look at any of the really good performing cars out there(above your average guy with same setup) and you will see a set of hand finished heads. I know some people will start with a set of cncs just to knock off alot of the meat off then go in and hand finish the setup. I've also seen cnc heads that are all over the board on port to port flow..so don't think they are all perfect. But..same goes for hand done heads..I've seen ports vary as much as 30 cfm. I agree with LE though in that if your looking for a good running car you will be satisfied with heads from either shop. .
Last edited by 95Bird; May 15, 2006 at 12:57 PM.
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Originally Posted by 95Bird
wow...this is crazy...My cam is at least a 8 year old off the shelf grind..anyone up to sending me a new one?
Joe..nice to see ya around.
As far as the heads go, I've seen good results out of both camps. I'm not sure if LE has had anyone go full out on his setup but I know of one that is close. In a car that is Set up for nitrous he is prolly going to bust into the 10s soon. Runs 9s on the jug right now. I'm not sure what cam he has but I think its a 306...could be wrong though. As stated elsewhere here a cnc is a good way to put out a consistant head. I don't think it will be a max effort head though. Look at any of the really good performing cars out there(above your average guy with same setup) and you will see a set of hand finished heads. I know some people will start with a set of cncs just to knock off alot of the meat off then go in and had finish the setup. I've also seen cnc heads that are all over the board on port to port flow..so don't think they are all perfect. But..same goes for had done heads..I've seen ports vary as much as 30 cfm. I agree with LE though in that if your looking for a good running car you will be satisfied with heads from either shop. .
Joe..nice to see ya around.
As far as the heads go, I've seen good results out of both camps. I'm not sure if LE has had anyone go full out on his setup but I know of one that is close. In a car that is Set up for nitrous he is prolly going to bust into the 10s soon. Runs 9s on the jug right now. I'm not sure what cam he has but I think its a 306...could be wrong though. As stated elsewhere here a cnc is a good way to put out a consistant head. I don't think it will be a max effort head though. Look at any of the really good performing cars out there(above your average guy with same setup) and you will see a set of hand finished heads. I know some people will start with a set of cncs just to knock off alot of the meat off then go in and had finish the setup. I've also seen cnc heads that are all over the board on port to port flow..so don't think they are all perfect. But..same goes for had done heads..I've seen ports vary as much as 30 cfm. I agree with LE though in that if your looking for a good running car you will be satisfied with heads from either shop. .

Sup Tim?
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Originally Posted by Kraest

Sup Tim?

Its only 5 years old at 7000+ rpms...thought I would go in and check it out before something lets go and hurts my heads.
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Brett the rock is a life...maybe you should find one, other than the internet .
And Brett please, as far as a conversation. Why would I give you any more knowledge than the cam guru you self proclaim to be ,wouldnt already know.. wheres this power across the curve? on a peice of paper? cause thats the only place maybe you can show me.But as the people with some dyno knowledge know, things can be made to seem what they really are not.. Other than that why dont you step up and really and I mean really do something... I don't have 1 car or 2 cars I have many ,and suprise!!!! I didnt tune all of them or set the cars up...But alas they outperform your best efforts...
All we hear is dyno this, dyno that... when it comes to you...
So anybody reading this....here is some wise information..
If you want to be a sheep grazing in Brett's pasteur and all you want is a dyno graph to show your friends... by all means you found your boy in Brett..
If you want to hold a timeslip to be proud of instead of a dyno sheet...well need I say more...
............
now lets start hearing the crying of excuses..
its tuning, its car setup, its blah blah blah... You had a few years Brett you cant tell me you havnt had quite a few of what you thought would be top performing customers... Maybe a search would show how some of these power houses failed to meet expectations... only to hear the same backing up of excuses we'll see you post here... Happy Sales Brett .. If the Moderators remember years back I got slammed for advertisement...thing is I never pushed anything, Unlike you.. figure with all your cam sales you could atleast kick back some revenue to a board you utilize so much ,and thats enabled you to make some income. I mean what is good for the goose is good for the gander as it were...
And Brett please, as far as a conversation. Why would I give you any more knowledge than the cam guru you self proclaim to be ,wouldnt already know.. wheres this power across the curve? on a peice of paper? cause thats the only place maybe you can show me.But as the people with some dyno knowledge know, things can be made to seem what they really are not.. Other than that why dont you step up and really and I mean really do something... I don't have 1 car or 2 cars I have many ,and suprise!!!! I didnt tune all of them or set the cars up...But alas they outperform your best efforts...
All we hear is dyno this, dyno that... when it comes to you...
So anybody reading this....here is some wise information..
If you want to be a sheep grazing in Brett's pasteur and all you want is a dyno graph to show your friends... by all means you found your boy in Brett..
If you want to hold a timeslip to be proud of instead of a dyno sheet...well need I say more...
............
now lets start hearing the crying of excuses..
its tuning, its car setup, its blah blah blah... You had a few years Brett you cant tell me you havnt had quite a few of what you thought would be top performing customers... Maybe a search would show how some of these power houses failed to meet expectations... only to hear the same backing up of excuses we'll see you post here... Happy Sales Brett .. If the Moderators remember years back I got slammed for advertisement...thing is I never pushed anything, Unlike you.. figure with all your cam sales you could atleast kick back some revenue to a board you utilize so much ,and thats enabled you to make some income. I mean what is good for the goose is good for the gander as it were...
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
FWIW to the rest of the guys eating popcorn reading this thread... sorry for getting off on tangents and arguing. I had a family member die this weekend and I usually fall of my rocker and start fights with the kids when crap like this happens.... I just have some strong thoughts that most times I keep to myself except when I need to do a little "venting"
Bret
Bret
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Mature as normal Overton, Back to the name calling and acting like a punk as normal I see..... at least learn to spell my name correctly.
Still nothing technical to talk about as normal. I wouldn't want people to know I was "slow" either if I was you.
Bret
Still nothing technical to talk about as normal. I wouldn't want people to know I was "slow" either if I was you.
Bret
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Originally Posted by A/G
So, you are stating the pressure should be on LE to come out on top? Afterall, the AI heads are untouched by hand grinding.
Last edited by 95Bird; May 15, 2006 at 01:17 PM.
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
trymy6: This always happens. I will give you some relavent info, but then I will add to the pile.
I bought a cam & head package from AI. I got the 190 CC heads, and a gm-847ish cam (within a couple of degrees). I have a 96 SS, 6-speed, bmr suspension parts (lca's, sfc's, torque arm, k-member) and moser 12 bolt.
It dyno'd 397.3 rwhp & 357.1 tq N/A.
Here is a vid of a pass I made:
http://videos.camaroz28.com/search/9...904A07731B.htm
At the time of the video the car weighed a little over 3800, w/me in it.
I bogged it out of the hole (as seen in the vid, there is a sudden jump then it falls flat, then picks up). I should of gave it more RPM, might of gone a little better, but that's how it was.
I put a 200 shot to it and it dynoed 575 rwhp & 614 tq.
That got a 10.5 @128, but the clutch was slipping all day. It managed to hold together for that pass, but ultimately was inadaquate (spec stg III, aluminum FW). You can hear it in this vid:
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/5...84CE212C53.htm
I am tweaking things a little more and will have my new set up out shortly.
I have no information on LE products.
I am making an effort to get a bunch of guys to get together and race
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=448220
Why does every one want to race dyno's and not cars
.
My car didn't break 400 to the tire but it runs in the 11's and has a respectable trap @ almost 117. So on the dyno (or web, or engine analyzer) I loose, but on the street I run good soooo that doesn't count?
This debate is getting some what tiresome.
Lets take it to the track.
I bought a cam & head package from AI. I got the 190 CC heads, and a gm-847ish cam (within a couple of degrees). I have a 96 SS, 6-speed, bmr suspension parts (lca's, sfc's, torque arm, k-member) and moser 12 bolt.
It dyno'd 397.3 rwhp & 357.1 tq N/A.
Here is a vid of a pass I made:
http://videos.camaroz28.com/search/9...904A07731B.htm
At the time of the video the car weighed a little over 3800, w/me in it.
I bogged it out of the hole (as seen in the vid, there is a sudden jump then it falls flat, then picks up). I should of gave it more RPM, might of gone a little better, but that's how it was.
I put a 200 shot to it and it dynoed 575 rwhp & 614 tq.
That got a 10.5 @128, but the clutch was slipping all day. It managed to hold together for that pass, but ultimately was inadaquate (spec stg III, aluminum FW). You can hear it in this vid:
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/5...84CE212C53.htm
I am tweaking things a little more and will have my new set up out shortly.
I have no information on LE products.
I am making an effort to get a bunch of guys to get together and race
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=448220
Why does every one want to race dyno's and not cars
.My car didn't break 400 to the tire but it runs in the 11's and has a respectable trap @ almost 117. So on the dyno (or web, or engine analyzer) I loose, but on the street I run good soooo that doesn't count?
This debate is getting some what tiresome.
Lets take it to the track.
Last edited by 526 SS 96; May 15, 2006 at 01:37 PM.
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Originally Posted by 526 SS 96
Why does every one want to race dyno's and not cars
.
My car didn't break 400 to the tire but it runs mid 11's. So on the dyno (or web, or engine analyzer) I loose, but on the street I run good soooo that doesn't count?
This debate is getting some what tiresome.
Lets take it to the track.
.My car didn't break 400 to the tire but it runs mid 11's. So on the dyno (or web, or engine analyzer) I loose, but on the street I run good soooo that doesn't count?
This debate is getting some what tiresome.
Lets take it to the track.
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Originally Posted by A/G
OK, that settles it. LE is behind the 8-ball now.
I just don't understand why an' hell the moderators don't step in..... and start posting. :blah:
I just don't understand why an' hell the moderators don't step in..... and start posting. :blah:
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc
Originally Posted by 95Bird
LE has offered up a set of heads for a test..I haven't seen AI offer that. I do think if this is done an existing set of heads..say within the last 3-6 months should be used to get a true judge of what each shop is putting out and not give them a chance to "prep" a set of heads.
Good point.



you should be.