LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2006 | 05:19 PM
  #31  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by thesoundandthefury
I took it that by your statement of comparing "apples to apples," you were referring to the standards for judging head performance in and of themselves, but it appears not.
For the very reasons you mentioned, it is difficult to compare the performance in and of itself of a 'head to head' comparison (pun intended). We all know that flow numbers, in and of themselves, mean little. Why do cars with heads that 'only' flow 270cfm sometimes outrun cars with heads that flow 300cfm? The answer, as you know, has as much to do with the rest of the combination and the perserverence to get it right.
Old May 14, 2006 | 05:20 PM
  #32  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by Honda Hunter
Everythread like this goes the same way and the sames things are said. Time for someone to pick up the ball and make it happen. Still wont put anything to rest. I think both heads should be flowed on the same bench also before testing which Golen can do I think
Send me your credit card, and I'll make it happen


Yeah, I didn't think so...
Old May 14, 2006 | 05:20 PM
  #33  
firebirdStud's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,161
From: Colorado
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Wow, lots of opinions, and I can sense some tension already. Its sad, the guy just wants to see if we can help him decide which porter to go with. I told him my experiences. Some opinions, but they are obvious ones...cnc versus hand porting. If 300 dollars sways you to one porter over the other, sell your car now. High horspower is an endless money pit. You have to pay to play. Like I said, AI may cost more, but look what you get. Consistency across the board. Every port is the exact same. Every valve lap is the exact same. Nascar or F1 quality here. Does NASCAR or F1 hand port their heads? I dont think so! If you are on a budget, definately go with lloyd. There are way too many people having awesome results with his product to think he isn't very good!
But, If you want a head that is cut by the computer to ensure years of service, AI is your beast. After talking to Ron, it seems like the people they cater to more is the corvettes and to the older generation. People who have been here, done that. Now they want the best money can buy. I bypassed all that learn on crappy stuff first, and went straight to the best.
Old May 14, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #34  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Hey, as I said before let's throw a LE package, a AI package for a 3000-6500rpm 350 cube motor to Golen and have them throw them on the engine dyno. Hell let's put a CC306 cam in there as well so we can compare them on the same camshaft as well, it would be good to see all the differences that the heads and the cams make.
I think this would be a very interesting comparison
Old May 14, 2006 | 05:38 PM
  #35  
Honda Hunter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,271
From: Bahrain
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
Send me your credit card, and I'll make it happen


Yeah, I didn't think so...
Have to understand, im nuetral. All in all I could care less if it does or doesnt because my heads are on the car already and they arent coming off because the other brand made 10rwhp more. I just think it would be intresting and it may help just a little when threads like this pop up.
Old May 14, 2006 | 05:47 PM
  #36  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

So what about the cams in the comparison? Does the fact that one of us has experience and OTOH it's just cookie cutter specs make a difference? The same machines cut the cam lobes so you can't make the "Like I said, AI may cost more, but look what you get. Consistency across the board. Every port is the exact same. Every valve lap is the exact same. "

Bret
Old May 14, 2006 | 05:50 PM
  #37  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by FastZinTennessee
I think this would be a very interesting comparison
I agree... I'm willing to pony up the valvetrain on my end... problem is Ai will live off the rep that they are "better" because a few guys say so, so to risk that "rep" is not in their best interests. That's why this will never happen. Lloyd is considered the "other guy" to them, but he's always willing to put it on the line anytime, FWIW I don't think there is anyone who can out do me in cams (fast car or not) and I'll put my *** on the line anytime, I think Lloyd feels the same way and I don't blame him.

Bret

Last edited by SStrokerAce; May 14, 2006 at 05:52 PM.
Old May 14, 2006 | 06:03 PM
  #38  
thesoundandthefury's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 862
From: Columbus, IN
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
Why do cars with heads that 'only' flow 270cfm sometimes outrun cars with heads that flow 300cfm? The answer, as you know, has as much to do with the rest of the combination
Interesting. So let's say in the instance where we were to bolt both sets of heads to the same engine, removing "the rest of the combination" as a variable that could possibly skew the true performance data of each respective head, what variables are we left with to consider?

Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
We all know that flow numbers, in and of themselves, mean little.
Okay. So if flow numbers aren't that important in judging a head's performance, what is?
Old May 14, 2006 | 06:07 PM
  #39  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by thesoundandthefury
Okay. So if flow numbers aren't that important in judging a head's performance, what is?
The same way you measure camshafts, not by specs but by results, power numbers or drag times... but I would say that engine dyno numbers is the real key.

Bret
Old May 14, 2006 | 06:09 PM
  #40  
Grease's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 870
From: Cuyahoga Falls, OHIO
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
I don't think there is anyone who can out do me in cams (fast car or not) and I'll put my *** on the line anytime

Bret
Are you saying that you are better than AI when it comes to cams?
Old May 14, 2006 | 06:16 PM
  #41  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by Grease
Are you saying that you are better than AI when it comes to cams?
Anybody, I'm not afraid to go up against anybody, ever. They can be included in that if you want. You give me the same car, motor, dyno or track and I have no problem going head to head, especially with these street hyd roller setups. You can go outside of that box as well if you want.

Bret
Old May 14, 2006 | 06:30 PM
  #42  
tireburnin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,193
From: San Diego, CA
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Hey, as I said before let's throw a LE package, a AI package for a 3000-6500rpm 350 cube motor to Golen and have them throw them on the engine dyno. Hell let's put a CC306 cam in there as well so we can compare them on the same camshaft as well, it would be good to see all the differences that the heads and the cams make. If they want to go with smaller valves and a much smaller port, then fine I don't care.

You guys basically saying that Ai has more attention to detail because they mill a few more things or whatever is pretty insulting to Lloyd. The things that count like VJ, port sizes in certain areas, guide clearance etc... are what really count and both places check that.

Bret
Most perfromance professionals realize that rwhp dynos are nothing more than a tuning aid in most cases. However, some performance shops use these numbers to sell the product to uninformed customers that only want peak rwhp bragging rites. Others may use the engine dyno for the same purpose since neither dyno can predict how the car will actually run on the track.

And I think we've been down the road of off the shelf cams with both heads. 847 cam with LE2 heads was 390ish rwhp. Ai heads went 400-410rwhp. Ai cars also went faster at the track with these similar setups. (I can list specific cars/people, but it would just get nit picky)

(And there was no disrespect intended toward loydd or you, just the facts that they do different work)
Old May 14, 2006 | 06:38 PM
  #43  
Grease's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 870
From: Cuyahoga Falls, OHIO
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Anybody, I'm not afraid to go up against anybody, ever. They can be included in that if you want. You give me the same car, motor, dyno or track and I have no problem going head to head, especially with these street hyd roller setups. You can go outside of that box as well if you want.

Bret
Thats a pretty bold statement, and a hard one to prove right or wrong. What is it you know that Joe O and AI don't know about?
Old May 14, 2006 | 06:44 PM
  #44  
kick Z tail out's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,746
From: Hemet, CA
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

As far as I see it, as an outsider... That doesn't have either companys' package, and would like either one...

It seems to me that people are just getting irked because they like Lloyd and think he's a nice guy. So you have people getting pissed off and defending him like he's getting beat on or something.

When you consider a CNC job to someone doing it by hand... where is the real argument? Because he's nice? That's good, and AFAIK his package is cool and really affordable. Everyone that has one is happy with it. But if someone says it's not the best out there, why argue about it?
Old May 14, 2006 | 06:57 PM
  #45  
Honda Hunter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,271
From: Bahrain
Re: LE2 setup vs. AI 190cc

Originally Posted by A/G
I haven't read the next two pages yet, but I'm leery. :cringe: The more recent thread of this nature reminded me of my cousin and myself when I was ~10. We were arguing about whose dad was better.
I swear do a search. This happens everytime a thread like this is made and everyone says the same thing. It's crazy.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 AM.