Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Corvette VS New Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 06:30 PM
  #61  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
Charlie, I respect you a lot. But I simply DESPISE the insinuation that the 4th Gen quote "put Camaro on hiatus." The Camaro was selling about as well as could be expected considering many things, and even if it sold in significantly higher quantities, the way everything played out, no one can be sure the Camaro would have continued on uninterrupted into the 5th Gen.

No offence intended Mark.

But I can garauntee you something. Had the 4th gen sold 100,000 units per year or more, in it's last few years.....all it's issues would have been resolved.

Architecturally, politically, financially.
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #62  
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

Originally Posted by Z284ever
No offence intended Mark.

But I can garauntee you something. Had the 4th gen sold 100,000 units per year or more, in it's last few years.....all it's issues would have been resolved.

Architecturally, politically, financially.
Agreed, but didn't GM set the car purposefully not to sell 100,000 units? I'm not sure how many cars out there could sell 70K units a year with advertizing and almost all support dollars pulled.
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 07:52 PM
  #63  
Chewbacca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 859
From: AR (PA born and fled)
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

I asked this in another thread but didn't get a response. Any thoughts toward the feasibility of such pie in the sky thinking?

Originally Posted by Chewbacca
I've had a question / thought rolling around in my head for some time now and this seems to be a good thread to let it out.

IMO the LS7 will no way no how ever be put into even a special edition Camaro. The engine is just too expensive.

*PURE SPECULATION AHEAD*

What if.....

...the LS7 could be stripped of it's Ti parts and dry sump system? What if more standard parts could be used with a lowered redline (6500) and power rating (470).

Is this even feasible with the LS7?

If so, would it be economical enough for a $38,000- $40,000 limited production ZO6-like Z28?

Would they call it LS5?


Thoughts?
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #64  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

Originally Posted by Chris 96 WS6
I'm not sure how many cars out there could sell 70K units a year with advertizing and almost all support dollars pulled.
True.
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 09:47 PM
  #65  
Killaz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 362
From: Portland, OR
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

So it sounds like we are not going to see a 450 hp camaro for under 35k....Why?? does an extra 100 HP cost GM an extra 10,000dollars to make??? i dont think so, can they charge that?(YES) but what if they didn't. What if they had a 450HP Z28 SS camaro for $29,900 not fully loaded. I could for see the amount of cars they would sell. Make the Z28 ss 450HP make the Corvette (C6) 500 hp and the Z06 575 i mean the Z06 is already 70,000dollars so......

Adam

Last edited by Killaz; Jun 24, 2005 at 09:54 PM.
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 11:19 PM
  #66  
blackblur1996z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 246
From: las vegas nevada
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

I'm thinking and hoping for:

Z28-380hp--32k
SS-460hp--39k
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 06:53 AM
  #67  
DrewSG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 627
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

Originally Posted by Killaz
So it sounds like we are not going to see a 450 hp camaro for under 35k....Why?? does an extra 100 HP cost GM an extra 10,000dollars to make??? i dont think so, can they charge that?(YES) but what if they didn't. What if they had a 450HP Z28 SS camaro for $29,900 not fully loaded. I could for see the amount of cars they would sell. Make the Z28 ss 450HP make the Corvette (C6) 500 hp and the Z06 575 i mean the Z06 is already 70,000dollars so......

Adam
It's not that simple. 100 extra HP means you have beef up your drivetrain to support that extra 100HP (From the engine to the rear end (God I hope GM puts a stronger rear in the 5th gen)), and that costs more money. GM is not here to give us an unreliable race ready car..
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 08:13 AM
  #68  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

Originally Posted by notgetleft
The big question is, should all V8 non-Z28s be SS's to simplify the model line.
Pretty much disagreed with most of your post...except this.

This is something I've thought about also. It would require more than one Camaro SS model though - which I don't think is a necessarily bad thing.
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 12:11 PM
  #69  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

Originally Posted by Z284ever
No offence intended Mark.

But I can garauntee you something. Had the 4th gen sold 100,000 units per year or more, in it's last few years.....all it's issues would have been resolved.

Architecturally, politically, financially.
Looks like all those issues are being resolved, or have been resolved already. Too bad it's going to take 6 years to accomplish it when it's all said and done.

Success of a car doesn't necessarily guarantee its survival, at least at GM. One only has to look at the death of the B-body to see that.
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 05:41 PM
  #70  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

Originally Posted by notgetleft
Rats, nailed on a technicality. You're cool. I guess i should have said 'performance' V8 cars. As in there hasn't been an SS as anything but top dog since what, 72. I'm not going to do my homework since you'll correct me if i'm wrong anyway.

You're right, only one gen used SS as top dog. But it's the most recent one, you know, the one that matters. Let me explain this further, i don't think i'm making my point because you're not trying to see the way i think a non-hardcore camaro/chevy guy does.

To anyone under 30, probably 40 even, SS camaro means the baddest. To me the overwhelming image of early SS's that i've seen in my entire life are all big block, really nicely done small block cars, lots of drag cars, etc. Of the early Z28s, they're always museum style resto's so look / sound stock. Nothing about the car screams top dog, and face it, on the street it wasn't either (or at least that's what old timers tell me). A 302 is no match for a big block, period. The LT1 Z28s might have been nice, but face it, you say LT1, even your grandma pictures a fourth gen btw, LT-1, i know you were itching to correct me so i misspelled it on purpose.

So really, to be true to it's road racing roots, sticking a mid-power V8 in a stripped light car would be closest to a first gen. 1LE basically, especially if you return it to thirdgen roots where it doens't have power everything, etc. Make Z28 mean not fancy, not drag race over the top power.

SS would naturally have the highest powered engine. It was always the model with the most available power anyway. The big question is, should all V8 non-Z28s be SS's to simplify the model line. Just like SS 350 vs. SS 396. Screw having base V8 cars, if you want 2 engines in the base car, 2 V6s, call the hi-po the RS and give it upgraded trim, and even make an SS/RS as the luxo.

That'd be true to roots. Not acting lik the Z28s were all yenko 427 cars.
I'm sorry but your imagined history of the Camaro is skewed and heavily flawed.
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 08:44 PM
  #71  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

Originally Posted by jg95z28
I'm sorry but your imagined history of the Camaro is skewed and heavily flawed.
Erm... apart from this:

"So really, to be true to it's road racing roots, sticking a mid-power V8 in a stripped light car would be closest to a first gen."

And this...

"SS would naturally have the highest powered engine. It was always the model with the most available power anyway."

And this...

"You're right, only one gen used SS as top dog. But it's the most recent one, you know, the one that matters."

Which is correct on a technicality... the COPO cars were actually the fastest, with the 375hp SS's behind them and the Z28's running third.

Which then pretty much means the whole basis of his post was correct.
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 12:36 AM
  #72  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

The relatively small number of '67-'69 375hp 396's were truly fast in a straight line. This was to be the top version of the Camaro SS which also could be had with 295 hp and 325HP.

Who would have known in September 1966, that afew days after Christmas of that year, Chevy would clandestinely deliver the first Z/28 to race teams....with a 400-450 hp smallblock. It's mission? To win glory for Camaro and Chevrolet in a brutally competitive, Mustang dominated, road racing series.

And get this. Just for ***** and giggles, they would rate it's smallblock at 290 hp.
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 11:42 AM
  #73  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

Originally Posted by Z284ever
The relatively small number of '67-'69 375hp 396's were truly fast in a straight line. This was to be the top version of the Camaro SS which also could be had with 295 hp and 325HP.

Who would have known in September 1966, that afew days after Christmas of that year, Chevy would clandestinely deliver the first Z/28 to race teams....with a 400-450 hp smallblock. It's mission? To win glory for Camaro and Chevrolet in a brutally competitive, Mustang dominated, road racing series.

And get this. Just for ***** and giggles, they would rate it's smallblock at 290 hp.
You can clandestinely cite whatever you want, but the cold, hard fact of the matter is that of the production cars the top-gun 396 was most assuredly quicker.
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 11:57 AM
  #74  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

Alright lets settle this once and for all all SS fans line up over -> Here and start chugging some beer.


All Z28 fans line up over
Here<-- You start chugging some beer.

At the count of ten everyone start pissing and lets see who can **** the farthest because that is all this thread has turned into.
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #75  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Corvette VS New Camaro

Originally Posted by PacerX
You can clandestinely cite whatever you want, but the cold, hard fact of the matter is that of the production cars the top-gun 396 was most assuredly quicker.

Umm, quicker by how much, and on which road course?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM.