The Sad News
I think jg95z28 got pretty close on the SS, but for me, the Z/28 would be more about the HD hardware.....i.e. better brakes, better axles, better seats/shocks/springs/bushings/swaybars/braces, louder (read: less restrictive) exhaust, less sound-deadening, etc.....and it's OWN style hood!! I'm tired of the Z/28 looking like a base model with dual exhaust, i.e. the 4th gen formula....
I don't want anything but a large displacement, NA engine (not a forced induction kinda' guy....superchargers don't like the quick on-off throttle I use on the road courses and turbos can be a major pita for the same reasons...call me old fashioned)
I don't want anything but a large displacement, NA engine (not a forced induction kinda' guy....superchargers don't like the quick on-off throttle I use on the road courses and turbos can be a major pita for the same reasons...call me old fashioned)
However I don't want a 1LE stripper track car. I want a Z06-like road racer.
Just to recap:
1. SS is going to be the top performing volume Camaro if current direction holds.
2. Z28 as it was positioned in the 4th gen may not happen, and because of where the SS is planned to be positioned, the Z28's position of the latter 2nd and 3rd gen is also not likely if directions hold.
3. This leaves only 2 options that I can see: A. Becoming a high performance package on the SS, or B. becoming a high priced, low production performance model.
4. If there is a way to continue the Z28 as a model that's both relatively affordable and doesn't canabalize the SS, it would be nice to find it.
5. Any solution should reflect on Z28's heritage as a track car, not as a budget base performance model (which did so well last time
).
6. It seems that the only direction that anyone has come up with is the "Super Camaro", Z06-like, $40,000+ solution.
1. SS is going to be the top performing volume Camaro if current direction holds.
2. Z28 as it was positioned in the 4th gen may not happen, and because of where the SS is planned to be positioned, the Z28's position of the latter 2nd and 3rd gen is also not likely if directions hold.
3. This leaves only 2 options that I can see: A. Becoming a high performance package on the SS, or B. becoming a high priced, low production performance model.
4. If there is a way to continue the Z28 as a model that's both relatively affordable and doesn't canabalize the SS, it would be nice to find it.
5. Any solution should reflect on Z28's heritage as a track car, not as a budget base performance model (which did so well last time
). 6. It seems that the only direction that anyone has come up with is the "Super Camaro", Z06-like, $40,000+ solution.
I've said it 1,001 times...follow the Z06 formula for the Z/28 and it'll all be good....the SS is the Z51 Corvette of Camaros.
Alas...I'm somewhere between believing like Charlie that the Z/28 shouldn't cost an arm and a leg, but IF it comes with the HD hardware & engine I'd like to see, then so be the $40k sticker...
Alas...I'm somewhere between believing like Charlie that the Z/28 shouldn't cost an arm and a leg, but IF it comes with the HD hardware & engine I'd like to see, then so be the $40k sticker...
Boy, this thing is in the weeds now.
Didn't we have a rumor a while back that the Blue Devil could be an "SS"? I don't think that the name has been announced for that Top Dog Vette yet so GM may still want an "SS" Vette (
Peace Doug!)
The thing that has me fuzzy is the thought of the SS moniker becoming the "GT" equivalent. To this point the SS has sort of been an SVT variant. Bit@h about the Cobalt all you want, but remember the Focus SVT?
I'm betting that if the Z comes back that it will be a Saleen or GMMG-like version that represents the Super Camaro Extreme.
BUT......the Z may be officially dead or relagated to lower duty if the Top Vette becomes the SS. Otherwise the performance naming strategy would be inverse in the two lines:
(Vette, Z06, SS VS. Camaro, SS, Z28)
Or worse yet, it could be the equivalent of the "Boss, Bullet, or Hertz Shelby" type debacle
I don't care what they call it as long as I can mod it, and it eats ponys!
Didn't we have a rumor a while back that the Blue Devil could be an "SS"? I don't think that the name has been announced for that Top Dog Vette yet so GM may still want an "SS" Vette (
Peace Doug!)The thing that has me fuzzy is the thought of the SS moniker becoming the "GT" equivalent. To this point the SS has sort of been an SVT variant. Bit@h about the Cobalt all you want, but remember the Focus SVT?
I'm betting that if the Z comes back that it will be a Saleen or GMMG-like version that represents the Super Camaro Extreme.
BUT......the Z may be officially dead or relagated to lower duty if the Top Vette becomes the SS. Otherwise the performance naming strategy would be inverse in the two lines:
(Vette, Z06, SS VS. Camaro, SS, Z28)
Or worse yet, it could be the equivalent of the "Boss, Bullet, or Hertz Shelby" type debacle
I don't care what they call it as long as I can mod it, and it eats ponys!
SS = Luxo ride performance Camaro. Big V8, NAV, Ttop, YADA YADA. Girls like it too.
Z28 = Decontented, but not unliveable. AC, Tilt, Cruise, hard top only, manual only, aimed at munching GT500s.
Looks like we are all singing they "you can call me Ray" song now............
Z28 = Decontented, but not unliveable. AC, Tilt, Cruise, hard top only, manual only, aimed at munching GT500s.
Looks like we are all singing they "you can call me Ray" song now............
Z/28 the "racecar option"
I mostly just read the threads, but I wanted to speak out on this topic.
If we want a super performance camaro this is what we need from GM.
Base Camaro <20K
SS Camaro <30K
Z/28 Camaro around 37K
I own a 2000 Z28 6 speed, t-tops, etc. Do I love this car? Absolutely! Is it a "race car"? Absolutely! Is it what I wanted? Absolutely!
Does the general public love this car? To look at? Yes! To Drive? No!
This car is a "race car", tight steering, bumpy ride, no modern amenities. GM gave us what we asked for in the 4th gen, a "race car", but nobody but us race car fans liked to drive it as an everyday driver. If we want the 5th gen to be popular (and we do) we need an SS that's more in line with say a Monte Carlo SS. ie. Driver friendly.
Everyone keeps asking how to differentiate an SS from a Z. Point blank the answer is to make the SS comfortable to drive. Looser steering ratio, smoother riding. ie. mass market appeal, a comfortable daily driver for everyone that is not like "us" and looking for a "race car", but still fast enough to get their heart racing.
Sidebar: Why did the SS outsell the Z/28 one year late in the 4th gen cycle? Because the SS was only a slight "SLP" upgrade from a Z/28, not a different car directed at a different market. There was no comfortable camaro with performance to be had in the 4th gen. Let's say that together, "there was no comfortable camaro with performance to be had in the 4th generation". And maybe there never has been in any generation, but I believe it cost GM sales. In today's market you need mass appeal to make the car feasable. Come on guys, how many people want to drive a 4th gen Z besides us? I would guess (no hard facts here) that "most" people would rather have a smoother riding Monte SS (but faster) class of vehicle. Everybody talks about having the V6 model to carry the Camaro line and make it feasable, but my viewpoint is that you also need a V8 "SS" model that's comfortable to drive and friendly to all drives.
All that being said, what I want is a V6 for the masses, an SS for the fast "comfortable" ride and a Z/28 with tight steering ratios, great handling and 6-speed for us. Possibly a higher engine option in the Z, but definately top of the line handling at the cost of feeling every bump on the road and a better transmission ratio. A Z/28 made by GM (not an aftermarket upgrade by SLP or someone else) that is truly a pavement pounding, curve ripping, true to its name Z/28.
In closing, the problem with the 4th gen was that there was no middle ground. You either got a V6 or a "race car" Z28/SS (basically the same car). We need the SS as a performance yet comfortable ride, so that we can have our often envied true "Z/28".
I've thought about this all week, and I'm done now. One last thing...Thank you fbodfather for helping bring back the only car I will ever own.
If we want a super performance camaro this is what we need from GM.
Base Camaro <20K
SS Camaro <30K
Z/28 Camaro around 37K
I own a 2000 Z28 6 speed, t-tops, etc. Do I love this car? Absolutely! Is it a "race car"? Absolutely! Is it what I wanted? Absolutely!
Does the general public love this car? To look at? Yes! To Drive? No!
This car is a "race car", tight steering, bumpy ride, no modern amenities. GM gave us what we asked for in the 4th gen, a "race car", but nobody but us race car fans liked to drive it as an everyday driver. If we want the 5th gen to be popular (and we do) we need an SS that's more in line with say a Monte Carlo SS. ie. Driver friendly.
Everyone keeps asking how to differentiate an SS from a Z. Point blank the answer is to make the SS comfortable to drive. Looser steering ratio, smoother riding. ie. mass market appeal, a comfortable daily driver for everyone that is not like "us" and looking for a "race car", but still fast enough to get their heart racing.
Sidebar: Why did the SS outsell the Z/28 one year late in the 4th gen cycle? Because the SS was only a slight "SLP" upgrade from a Z/28, not a different car directed at a different market. There was no comfortable camaro with performance to be had in the 4th gen. Let's say that together, "there was no comfortable camaro with performance to be had in the 4th generation". And maybe there never has been in any generation, but I believe it cost GM sales. In today's market you need mass appeal to make the car feasable. Come on guys, how many people want to drive a 4th gen Z besides us? I would guess (no hard facts here) that "most" people would rather have a smoother riding Monte SS (but faster) class of vehicle. Everybody talks about having the V6 model to carry the Camaro line and make it feasable, but my viewpoint is that you also need a V8 "SS" model that's comfortable to drive and friendly to all drives.
All that being said, what I want is a V6 for the masses, an SS for the fast "comfortable" ride and a Z/28 with tight steering ratios, great handling and 6-speed for us. Possibly a higher engine option in the Z, but definately top of the line handling at the cost of feeling every bump on the road and a better transmission ratio. A Z/28 made by GM (not an aftermarket upgrade by SLP or someone else) that is truly a pavement pounding, curve ripping, true to its name Z/28.
In closing, the problem with the 4th gen was that there was no middle ground. You either got a V6 or a "race car" Z28/SS (basically the same car). We need the SS as a performance yet comfortable ride, so that we can have our often envied true "Z/28".
I've thought about this all week, and I'm done now. One last thing...Thank you fbodfather for helping bring back the only car I will ever own.
You know guys, it just occured to me that it would one hell of a lot of fun to sit down with some the cooler heads in this discussion and thrash out a solution to this. Especially if we had access to some hard data from GM as to what was possible as well as what their market research shows.
I can see it now: the big blackboard at the front of the room, adequate refreshment, the GM parts bins open to us...
We could each charge exactly 1 Camaro for our services.
I can see it now: the big blackboard at the front of the room, adequate refreshment, the GM parts bins open to us...
We could each charge exactly 1 Camaro for our services.
Boy, this thing is in the weeds now.
Didn't we have a rumor a while back that the Blue Devil could be an "SS"? I don't think that the name has been announced for that Top Dog Vette yet so GM may still want an "SS" Vette (
Peace Doug!)
The thing that has me fuzzy is the thought of the SS moniker becoming the "GT" equivalent. To this point the SS has sort of been an SVT variant. Bit@h about the Cobalt all you want, but remember the Focus SVT?
I'm betting that if the Z comes back that it will be a Saleen or GMMG-like version that represents the Super Camaro Extreme.
BUT......the Z may be officially dead or relagated to lower duty if the Top Vette becomes the SS. Otherwise the performance naming strategy would be inverse in the two lines:
(Vette, Z06, SS VS. Camaro, SS, Z28)
Or worse yet, it could be the equivalent of the "Boss, Bullet, or Hertz Shelby" type debacle
I don't care what they call it as long as I can mod it, and it eats ponys!
Didn't we have a rumor a while back that the Blue Devil could be an "SS"? I don't think that the name has been announced for that Top Dog Vette yet so GM may still want an "SS" Vette (
Peace Doug!)The thing that has me fuzzy is the thought of the SS moniker becoming the "GT" equivalent. To this point the SS has sort of been an SVT variant. Bit@h about the Cobalt all you want, but remember the Focus SVT?
I'm betting that if the Z comes back that it will be a Saleen or GMMG-like version that represents the Super Camaro Extreme.
BUT......the Z may be officially dead or relagated to lower duty if the Top Vette becomes the SS. Otherwise the performance naming strategy would be inverse in the two lines:
(Vette, Z06, SS VS. Camaro, SS, Z28)
Or worse yet, it could be the equivalent of the "Boss, Bullet, or Hertz Shelby" type debacle
I don't care what they call it as long as I can mod it, and it eats ponys!

We've also heard rumblings that the Blue Devil Corvette may be called Z07, or Z06R because the Vette crowd is dead against any SS designation on their beloved sportscar. Z06R seems very likely as it would play off the Corvette's racing heritage.
So if GM decides to kill the Z/28 and use their SS designation for every other car in the line, what would the proposed GT500 killer be called... the Camaro SSR?

I can see it now...
Camaro-guy: This is my new Camaro SSR.
Mustang-guy: Where's the (pickup) bed?

Now you see the dilema.
Random thoughts related to the subject.
- IMO the Trailblazer absolutely nailed the "SS" formula. Significantly upgraded powertrain end to end, upgraded suspension, brakes, wheels and tires, unique body styling and minor (not enough) interior upgrades. I would hope that formula carries over to the Camaro.
- I"ll be really disappointed if the Camaro "SS" is simply the entry level V8.
- I'd really like to see "standalone" powertrain and handling packages. e.g. Solstice Z0K.
- The Z06 is a $25,000 option .... yet somehow Chevy is supposed to follow that formula for $10,000 to create the Z/28?
- IMO the Trailblazer absolutely nailed the "SS" formula. Significantly upgraded powertrain end to end, upgraded suspension, brakes, wheels and tires, unique body styling and minor (not enough) interior upgrades. I would hope that formula carries over to the Camaro.
- I"ll be really disappointed if the Camaro "SS" is simply the entry level V8.
- I'd really like to see "standalone" powertrain and handling packages. e.g. Solstice Z0K.
- The Z06 is a $25,000 option .... yet somehow Chevy is supposed to follow that formula for $10,000 to create the Z/28?
Random thoughts related to the subject.
- IMO the Trailblazer absolutely nailed the "SS" formula. Significantly upgraded powertrain end to end, upgraded suspension, brakes, wheels and tires, unique body styling and minor (not enough) interior upgrades. I would hope that formula carries over to the Camaro.
- IMO the Trailblazer absolutely nailed the "SS" formula. Significantly upgraded powertrain end to end, upgraded suspension, brakes, wheels and tires, unique body styling and minor (not enough) interior upgrades. I would hope that formula carries over to the Camaro.
- I"ll be really disappointed if the Camaro "SS" is simply the entry level V8.
- I'd really like to see "standalone" powertrain and handling packages. e.g. Solstice Z0K.
- The Z06 is a $25,000 option .... yet somehow Chevy is supposed to follow that formula for $10,000 to create the Z/28?
[devils advocate mode]
What if the Camaro SS is the only V8? Seriously.
Why does there need to be more than one V8? Why can't the base model be a V6?
[/devils advocate mode]
IMHO, there needs to be as many flavors of Camaro as there are Mustangs, with each competing in performance and price with their Ford counterparts.
What if the Camaro SS is the only V8? Seriously.
Why does there need to be more than one V8? Why can't the base model be a V6?
[/devils advocate mode]
IMHO, there needs to be as many flavors of Camaro as there are Mustangs, with each competing in performance and price with their Ford counterparts.
I encourage people to call our podcast voicemail hotline and give me their thoughts on the issue so I can address them...even if you agree or disagree or want to offer another idea to consider or leave general thoughts. You can't leave a wrong voicemail for us.
The number is 586-486-3182. Be sure to leave your name and forum user name.
The number is 586-486-3182. Be sure to leave your name and forum user name.If, as Scott has stated, there were some buyers that choose a 260HP Mustang over the 300+ HP 4th gen because the 4th gen was "too powerful" what will they say to 400+ HP? I think an AFM 5.3 with a really good sounding exhaust that runs on regular needs to be the entry V8, the LS3 is then a natural for the "SS". After that they can add displacement or a blower for the Z/28.
Last edited by poSSum; Jan 4, 2007 at 10:13 AM.
JasonE has beat this one to death, but I really believe Chevy is making a HUGE mistake if the Camaro is only offered with an ~300HP HF V6 and an ~425HP LS3 V8 ... especially if they are both "premium fuel recommended".
If, as Scott has stated, there were some buyers that choose a 260HP Mustang over the 300+ HP 4th gen because the 4th gen was "too powerful" what will they say to 400+ HP? I think an AFM 5.3 with a really good sounding exhaust that runs on regular needs to be the entry V8, the LS3 is then a natural for the "SS". After that they can add displacement or a blower for the Z/28.
If, as Scott has stated, there were some buyers that choose a 260HP Mustang over the 300+ HP 4th gen because the 4th gen was "too powerful" what will they say to 400+ HP? I think an AFM 5.3 with a really good sounding exhaust that runs on regular needs to be the entry V8, the LS3 is then a natural for the "SS". After that they can add displacement or a blower for the Z/28.
As far as adding a blower to a Z/28, I'm with Doug on that - I'd prefer normal aspiration. I wouldn't mind a hotter cammed version of the LS3, (would probably work well with the stick only scenario) along with the requisite intake and exhaust changes.


