2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

The Sad News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 12:26 AM
  #166  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
I think jg95z28 got pretty close on the SS, but for me, the Z/28 would be more about the HD hardware.....i.e. better brakes, better axles, better seats/shocks/springs/bushings/swaybars/braces, louder (read: less restrictive) exhaust, less sound-deadening, etc.....and it's OWN style hood!! I'm tired of the Z/28 looking like a base model with dual exhaust, i.e. the 4th gen formula....

I don't want anything but a large displacement, NA engine (not a forced induction kinda' guy....superchargers don't like the quick on-off throttle I use on the road courses and turbos can be a major pita for the same reasons...call me old fashioned)
My version includes all that as well. My point was more along the lines of very little options, just like the Z06.

Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
Umm... You quote me but Charlie gets diety status?

Except for some minor quibbles, I think what you flesh out agrees with my thinking on Z/28 being much like a 1LE.
1000 sorries Camino. I was still on my first cup of coffee. However I don't want a 1LE stripper track car. I want a Z06-like road racer.

Originally Posted by guionM
As far as Trans Am series, of course they allowed manufacturers to destroke engines. They had a 5 liter rule, and the engines had to be in production. You don't think they expected manufacturers to create whole new engines just for the series, did you?
Wrong Guy. They did require the engine size used to be production sizes. GM was going with the 283 in the Z/28 (The 327 and 350 were too big) until Vince Piggins got the idea to drop a hardened 283 crank into the 327 and drop it down two 302 cubes. (Of course most of the race versions were bored 15 over to the maximum displacement allowable of 305 cid/5.0 L.)

Originally Posted by guionM
You seem to have arrived at one of the only 2 conclusions I could come up with: Z28 as a $40K+ GT500 competitor.

What I'm trying to do is to see how to have both the Camaro SS and the Camaro Z28 in a model line up side by side.
IMHO, Camaro SS and Z/28 side by side doesn't work in 2009. The Z/28 needs to be that $40K+ GT500 competitor.

Originally Posted by guionM
Base level '68 SS was rated at 295 horsepower: 5 more than Z28.

Z28's engine was underrated?

SS had 3 other engine options. All 396 cubic inches & rated over 325 horsepower..... All of them were "underrated" too.
But not as much as the Z/28 was. The factory Z/28 put out closer to 400hp. Race versions were even more rediculous. If you actually believe the 350/295hp L48 is comparable to the the 302/290hp Z/28 motors (MO, MP and DZ), I have a bridge in Brooklyn I can sell you cheap.
Originally Posted by guionM
Just to recap:

1. SS is going to be the top performing volume Camaro if current direction holds.

2. Z28 as it was positioned in the 4th gen may not happen, and because of where the SS is planned to be positioned, the Z28's position of the latter 2nd and 3rd gen is also not likely if directions hold.

3. This leaves only 2 options that I can see: A. Becoming a high performance package on the SS, or B. becoming a high priced, low production performance model.

4. If there is a way to continue the Z28 as a model that's both relatively affordable and doesn't canabalize the SS, it would be nice to find it.

5. Any solution should reflect on Z28's heritage as a track car, not as a budget base performance model (which did so well last time ).

6. It seems that the only direction that anyone has come up with is the "Super Camaro", Z06-like, $40,000+ solution.
Bingo!

Originally Posted by Doug Harden
I've said it 1,001 times...follow the Z06 formula for the Z/28 and it'll all be good....the SS is the Z51 Corvette of Camaros.

Alas...I'm somewhere between believing like Charlie that the Z/28 shouldn't cost an arm and a leg, but IF it comes with the HD hardware & engine I'd like to see, then so be the $40k sticker...
I don't care what it costs... that's the Camaro I want, need and must have. I'd just rather see GM build it than some aftermarket hot rod shop.
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 12:59 AM
  #167  
Silver2009's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 157
From: Phoenix AZ
Boy, this thing is in the weeds now.

Didn't we have a rumor a while back that the Blue Devil could be an "SS"? I don't think that the name has been announced for that Top Dog Vette yet so GM may still want an "SS" Vette ( Peace Doug!)

The thing that has me fuzzy is the thought of the SS moniker becoming the "GT" equivalent. To this point the SS has sort of been an SVT variant. Bit@h about the Cobalt all you want, but remember the Focus SVT?


I'm betting that if the Z comes back that it will be a Saleen or GMMG-like version that represents the Super Camaro Extreme.

BUT......the Z may be officially dead or relagated to lower duty if the Top Vette becomes the SS. Otherwise the performance naming strategy would be inverse in the two lines:
(Vette, Z06, SS VS. Camaro, SS, Z28)

Or worse yet, it could be the equivalent of the "Boss, Bullet, or Hertz Shelby" type debacle

I don't care what they call it as long as I can mod it, and it eats ponys!
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 01:04 AM
  #168  
CaminoLS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
No worries jg, all is forgiven.

I also agree that the Z/28 should not be a stripper as many of the 1LE cars were. I just used 1LE to help get the point across. Z/28 would have to surpass that formula.
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 01:05 AM
  #169  
Silver2009's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 157
From: Phoenix AZ
SS = Luxo ride performance Camaro. Big V8, NAV, Ttop, YADA YADA. Girls like it too.

Z28 = Decontented, but not unliveable. AC, Tilt, Cruise, hard top only, manual only, aimed at munching GT500s.

Looks like we are all singing they "you can call me Ray" song now............
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 01:08 AM
  #170  
bpatton711's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7
From: Belleville, IL
Z/28 the "racecar option"

I mostly just read the threads, but I wanted to speak out on this topic.

If we want a super performance camaro this is what we need from GM.

Base Camaro <20K
SS Camaro <30K
Z/28 Camaro around 37K

I own a 2000 Z28 6 speed, t-tops, etc. Do I love this car? Absolutely! Is it a "race car"? Absolutely! Is it what I wanted? Absolutely!

Does the general public love this car? To look at? Yes! To Drive? No!
This car is a "race car", tight steering, bumpy ride, no modern amenities. GM gave us what we asked for in the 4th gen, a "race car", but nobody but us race car fans liked to drive it as an everyday driver. If we want the 5th gen to be popular (and we do) we need an SS that's more in line with say a Monte Carlo SS. ie. Driver friendly.

Everyone keeps asking how to differentiate an SS from a Z. Point blank the answer is to make the SS comfortable to drive. Looser steering ratio, smoother riding. ie. mass market appeal, a comfortable daily driver for everyone that is not like "us" and looking for a "race car", but still fast enough to get their heart racing.

Sidebar: Why did the SS outsell the Z/28 one year late in the 4th gen cycle? Because the SS was only a slight "SLP" upgrade from a Z/28, not a different car directed at a different market. There was no comfortable camaro with performance to be had in the 4th gen. Let's say that together, "there was no comfortable camaro with performance to be had in the 4th generation". And maybe there never has been in any generation, but I believe it cost GM sales. In today's market you need mass appeal to make the car feasable. Come on guys, how many people want to drive a 4th gen Z besides us? I would guess (no hard facts here) that "most" people would rather have a smoother riding Monte SS (but faster) class of vehicle. Everybody talks about having the V6 model to carry the Camaro line and make it feasable, but my viewpoint is that you also need a V8 "SS" model that's comfortable to drive and friendly to all drives.

All that being said, what I want is a V6 for the masses, an SS for the fast "comfortable" ride and a Z/28 with tight steering ratios, great handling and 6-speed for us. Possibly a higher engine option in the Z, but definately top of the line handling at the cost of feeling every bump on the road and a better transmission ratio. A Z/28 made by GM (not an aftermarket upgrade by SLP or someone else) that is truly a pavement pounding, curve ripping, true to its name Z/28.

In closing, the problem with the 4th gen was that there was no middle ground. You either got a V6 or a "race car" Z28/SS (basically the same car). We need the SS as a performance yet comfortable ride, so that we can have our often envied true "Z/28".

I've thought about this all week, and I'm done now. One last thing...Thank you fbodfather for helping bring back the only car I will ever own.
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 01:22 AM
  #171  
CaminoLS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
You know guys, it just occured to me that it would one hell of a lot of fun to sit down with some the cooler heads in this discussion and thrash out a solution to this. Especially if we had access to some hard data from GM as to what was possible as well as what their market research shows.

I can see it now: the big blackboard at the front of the room, adequate refreshment, the GM parts bins open to us...

We could each charge exactly 1 Camaro for our services.
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 08:25 AM
  #172  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Silver2009
Boy, this thing is in the weeds now.

Didn't we have a rumor a while back that the Blue Devil could be an "SS"? I don't think that the name has been announced for that Top Dog Vette yet so GM may still want an "SS" Vette ( Peace Doug!)

The thing that has me fuzzy is the thought of the SS moniker becoming the "GT" equivalent. To this point the SS has sort of been an SVT variant. Bit@h about the Cobalt all you want, but remember the Focus SVT?


I'm betting that if the Z comes back that it will be a Saleen or GMMG-like version that represents the Super Camaro Extreme.

BUT......the Z may be officially dead or relagated to lower duty if the Top Vette becomes the SS. Otherwise the performance naming strategy would be inverse in the two lines:
(Vette, Z06, SS VS. Camaro, SS, Z28)

Or worse yet, it could be the equivalent of the "Boss, Bullet, or Hertz Shelby" type debacle

I don't care what they call it as long as I can mod it, and it eats ponys!
Well since you brought it up...

We've also heard rumblings that the Blue Devil Corvette may be called Z07, or Z06R because the Vette crowd is dead against any SS designation on their beloved sportscar. Z06R seems very likely as it would play off the Corvette's racing heritage.

So if GM decides to kill the Z/28 and use their SS designation for every other car in the line, what would the proposed GT500 killer be called... the Camaro SSR?

I can see it now...

Camaro-guy: This is my new Camaro SSR.
Mustang-guy: Where's the (pickup) bed?



Now you see the dilema.
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #173  
poSSum's Avatar
Disciple
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,479
Random thoughts related to the subject.

- IMO the Trailblazer absolutely nailed the "SS" formula. Significantly upgraded powertrain end to end, upgraded suspension, brakes, wheels and tires, unique body styling and minor (not enough) interior upgrades. I would hope that formula carries over to the Camaro.
- I"ll be really disappointed if the Camaro "SS" is simply the entry level V8.
- I'd really like to see "standalone" powertrain and handling packages. e.g. Solstice Z0K.
- The Z06 is a $25,000 option .... yet somehow Chevy is supposed to follow that formula for $10,000 to create the Z/28?
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 09:11 AM
  #174  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Originally Posted by poSSum
Random thoughts related to the subject.

- IMO the Trailblazer absolutely nailed the "SS" formula. Significantly upgraded powertrain end to end, upgraded suspension, brakes, wheels and tires, unique body styling and minor (not enough) interior upgrades. I would hope that formula carries over to the Camaro.
Exactly....

- I"ll be really disappointed if the Camaro "SS" is simply the entry level V8.
I truly believe an entry level V8 can and should be a LT or RS version...

- I'd really like to see "standalone" powertrain and handling packages. e.g. Solstice Z0K.
I can see some arguing that this would be expensive due to cost sharing concerns for options.

- The Z06 is a $25,000 option .... yet somehow Chevy is supposed to follow that formula for $10,000 to create the Z/28?
Don't want or need carbon fiber body panels, aluminum frame or magnesium roof structure..... and I'll take my 427 w/o the dry sump oiling system if that saves me a few $$
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 09:38 AM
  #175  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
[devils advocate mode]
What if the Camaro SS is the only V8? Seriously.
Why does there need to be more than one V8? Why can't the base model be a V6?
[/devils advocate mode]

IMHO, there needs to be as many flavors of Camaro as there are Mustangs, with each competing in performance and price with their Ford counterparts.
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 10:01 AM
  #176  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Originally Posted by JasonD
I encourage people to call our podcast voicemail hotline and give me their thoughts on the issue so I can address them...even if you agree or disagree or want to offer another idea to consider or leave general thoughts. You can't leave a wrong voicemail for us. The number is 586-486-3182. Be sure to leave your name and forum user name.
I am very surprised that one one has called to verbalize their thoughts. We go into the studio tonight to record the episode that is to be released tomorrow, so you have until about 6pm EST!
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #177  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
I have to say that this has turned into one of the most fun threads we've had around here in the past year.
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 10:11 AM
  #178  
poSSum's Avatar
Disciple
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,479
Originally Posted by jg95z28
[devils advocate mode]
What if the Camaro SS is the only V8? Seriously.
Why does there need to be more than one V8? Why can't the base model be a V6?
[/devils advocate mode]
JasonE has beat this one to death, but I really believe Chevy is making a HUGE mistake if the Camaro is only offered with an ~300HP HF V6 and an ~425HP LS3 V8 ... especially if they are both "premium fuel recommended".

If, as Scott has stated, there were some buyers that choose a 260HP Mustang over the 300+ HP 4th gen because the 4th gen was "too powerful" what will they say to 400+ HP? I think an AFM 5.3 with a really good sounding exhaust that runs on regular needs to be the entry V8, the LS3 is then a natural for the "SS". After that they can add displacement or a blower for the Z/28.

Originally Posted by JasonD
I am very surprised that one one has called to verbalize their thoughts. We go into the studio tonight to record the episode that is to be released tomorrow, so you have until about 6pm EST!
Some of us are still getting used to this part of the internet.

Last edited by poSSum; Jan 4, 2007 at 10:13 AM.
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #179  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by poSSum
JasonE has beat this one to death, but I really believe Chevy is making a HUGE mistake if the Camaro is only offered with an ~300HP HF V6 and an ~425HP LS3 V8 ... especially if they are both "premium fuel recommended".

If, as Scott has stated, there were some buyers that choose a 260HP Mustang over the 300+ HP 4th gen because the 4th gen was "too powerful" what will they say to 400+ HP? I think an AFM 5.3 with a really good sounding exhaust that runs on regular needs to be the entry V8, the LS3 is then a natural for the "SS". After that they can add displacement or a blower for the Z/28.


One thing to consider, is that Mustang probably won't have a V8 under 350 hp by then.

As far as adding a blower to a Z/28, I'm with Doug on that - I'd prefer normal aspiration. I wouldn't mind a hotter cammed version of the LS3, (would probably work well with the stick only scenario) along with the requisite intake and exhaust changes.
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 10:45 AM
  #180  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Originally Posted by poSSum
Some of us are still getting used to this part of the internet.
Picking up a telephone and dialing a number? Yeah, not many people here have done that before...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 PM.