The Sad News
You know what I meant. The big blocks are pretty much gone from the muscle cars. The ZL-1 was the closest thing to a Shelby, NOT a Z28. The Z/28 was Boss competition. I was lucky enough to see a 4th gen ZL-1 I really thought it was a current 427 not a 454. I could be wrong on that though.
The 4th gen ZL-1 was a concept car. GM actually produced limited edition ZL1 aluminum big block crate motors, each sequencially numbered. They were 454 big blocks. (The even had a more limited RAM JET ZL1.) People often confuse the two, but they are not related.
The ZL-1 was, and still could be a 427
. Who cares if it's "packaged" in a smaller block, it's still big-block displacement, big-block performance
. I would give GM the biggest gold star if they A) build a Z/28 that menaces the GT500, and B) build a (albeit, high-priced) 427 ZL-1 that blows away all
.
. I would give GM the biggest gold star if they A) build a Z/28 that menaces the GT500, and B) build a (albeit, high-priced) 427 ZL-1 that blows away all
.Last edited by jg95z28; Jan 5, 2007 at 12:55 PM.
A "true" ZL-1 would be an absolute stripper - dog dish hubcaps, bench seat, column shifter, no carpeting - and have the biggest, most exotic motor available.
Of course, it would also cost 2-3X as much as an average Camaro, and sit on dealers lots for a couple of years, until it could be sold at a huge discount.
Of course, it would also cost 2-3X as much as an average Camaro, and sit on dealers lots for a couple of years, until it could be sold at a huge discount.
Hense a big reason so few were ever produced.
Chevrolet built 50 of these specifically for Fred Gibb, a Chevy dealer who wanted to take the Camaro drag racing, and needed the xtra cars to qualify. He figured he could sell them easily. Some other Chevy dealers got wind of this, and also wanted ZL1 Camaros, which Chevrolet built a total of 19 additional ones for them.
There was eventially an agreement between Gibb and GM where GM would buy back most of the vehicles (he only sold 13) the 1st time in automotive history a car maker bought back vehicles.
FWIW: the reason why these cars were sold as strippers is because all were expected to end up on drag strips. The ones Chevy bought back and reinvoiced were dressed up a little.
The 5.0 option included not just an engine with expensive forged internals, high flow alumunum manifolds, and a trick cam not to mention dual intakes, but also a unique suspension that made the car handle far better than it did otherwise. That makes the 5.0 a comprehensive package.
No the LX wasn't as glued down as a 3rd gen Camaro, but ordering a 5.0 wasn't just the engine. It was the suspension as well. Just like the Z28.
Here's a from left field flame suit and armor on idea.
The original Z/28 had a "small" motor dictated by the rules yet came with the "good" hardware. Since the HP race is getting stupid, especially when one goes to track events and sees many street cars putting down a lot more HP than race cars, and the V6 is rumored to deliver near LT1 performance, how about a V6 based Z/28 .... all the good stuff, suspension, brakes, seats, etc. from the SS in a less powerful configuration.
The original Z/28 had a "small" motor dictated by the rules yet came with the "good" hardware. Since the HP race is getting stupid, especially when one goes to track events and sees many street cars putting down a lot more HP than race cars, and the V6 is rumored to deliver near LT1 performance, how about a V6 based Z/28 .... all the good stuff, suspension, brakes, seats, etc. from the SS in a less powerful configuration.

But when the reality check kicks in, we'd end up spending more money to get the same result with no real fuel economy gain.
But I think a high powered V6 would make a killer RS.

Not true. For the 1 millionth time. The 1968 1/4 mile world champion was a Z/28 and it bested many a SS396 in its day. Granted it probably would have had a hard time against a ZL1 or Yenko, but just because it was a small-block does not mean it had "smaller" performance.
Z28s 302 was nortoriously weak under 4000 rpm. It was a 327 with a 283 crank, and the torque it made was relatively weak till you revved the begezus out of it.
It most certainly was not quicker than a 396 in the quarter, although Z28 usually had a higher trap speed (reflecting the engine's high RPM performance). The "so called" 325 horse 396 would eat the Z28 alive in 0-60 runs, with the Z taking roughly 1 second longer to 60 mph. Keep in mind there was also a 375 horse 396 also available (which typically bested the Z28 by 1.5 to 2 seconds in 0-60 runs).
Now.... above 100 mph, it was a different story.

I'm getting sick of the ZL-1 talk. The ZL-1 was and should always be a big block. Unless you guys are suggesting dropping a big block in this Camaro... please... drop the discussion.
You had a far better chance getting struck by lightning in your bathtub while showering with Catherine Zeta-Jones than you had coming across a ZL1 Camaro on the street.
The L72 427s were the engines that (while still very, very rare) mere mortals had a shot at ever seeing in real life on a real street.
Last edited by guionM; Jan 5, 2007 at 02:58 PM.
I'm guessing I probably won't be able to afford a Z28 or SS regardless of which ends up being the top performance model.
Originally Posted by guionM;
It most certainly was [b
It most certainly was [b
not[/b] quicker than a 396 in the quarter, although Z28 usually had a higher trap speed (reflecting the engine's high RPM performance). The "so called" 325 horse 396 would eat the Z28 alive in 0-60 runs, with the Z taking roughly 1 second longer to 60 mph. Keep in mind there was also a 375 horse 396 also available (which typically bested the Z28 by 1.5 to 2 seconds in 0-60 runs).
Now.... above 100 mph, it was a different story.
Now.... above 100 mph, it was a different story.

I've seen every period road test, and there's considerable variability in times, but suffice to say that the L-35 wasn't really considered a bruiser. But it was a step up from the high 15 second SS350.
As far as 1st gen Z/28 times, I've seen everything from mid 15's to low 12's. You certainly couldn't granny shift them if you wanted an impressive time.
Last edited by Z284ever; Jan 5, 2007 at 03:39 PM.
. That was when "street racing" was only "frowned upon", not "banned" and thrown the book at because of
. As well, I know my Dad spent almost every weekend at the track in the summer (wish I could say the same for myself
).
Chevrolet needed to build 50 to qualify for NHRA's Super Stock class.
Chevrolet built 50 of these specifically for Fred Gibb, a Chevy dealer who wanted to take the Camaro drag racing, and needed the xtra cars to qualify. He figured he could sell them easily. Some other Chevy dealers got wind of this, and also wanted ZL1 Camaros, which Chevrolet built a total of 19 additional ones for them.
There was eventially an agreement between Gibb and GM where GM would buy back most of the vehicles (he only sold 13) the 1st time in automotive history a car maker bought back vehicles.
FWIW: the reason why these cars were sold as strippers is because all were expected to end up on drag strips. The ones Chevy bought back and reinvoiced were dressed up a little.
Chevrolet built 50 of these specifically for Fred Gibb, a Chevy dealer who wanted to take the Camaro drag racing, and needed the xtra cars to qualify. He figured he could sell them easily. Some other Chevy dealers got wind of this, and also wanted ZL1 Camaros, which Chevrolet built a total of 19 additional ones for them.
There was eventially an agreement between Gibb and GM where GM would buy back most of the vehicles (he only sold 13) the 1st time in automotive history a car maker bought back vehicles.
FWIW: the reason why these cars were sold as strippers is because all were expected to end up on drag strips. The ones Chevy bought back and reinvoiced were dressed up a little.
No so fast there.
Z28s 302 was nortoriously weak under 4000 rpm. It was a 327 with a 283 crank, and the torque it made was relatively weak till you revved the begezus out of it.
It most certainly was not quicker than a 396 in the quarter, although Z28 usually had a higher trap speed (reflecting the engine's high RPM performance). The "so called" 325 horse 396 would eat the Z28 alive in 0-60 runs, with the Z taking roughly 1 second longer to 60 mph. Keep in mind there was also a 375 horse 396 also available (which typically bested the Z28 by 1.5 to 2 seconds in 0-60 runs).
Now.... above 100 mph, it was a different story.
Z28s 302 was nortoriously weak under 4000 rpm. It was a 327 with a 283 crank, and the torque it made was relatively weak till you revved the begezus out of it.
It most certainly was not quicker than a 396 in the quarter, although Z28 usually had a higher trap speed (reflecting the engine's high RPM performance). The "so called" 325 horse 396 would eat the Z28 alive in 0-60 runs, with the Z taking roughly 1 second longer to 60 mph. Keep in mind there was also a 375 horse 396 also available (which typically bested the Z28 by 1.5 to 2 seconds in 0-60 runs).
Now.... above 100 mph, it was a different story.

OLD RELIABLE (a Z/28) was the 1968 NHRA Super Stock World Champ. It ran 11.70s in the 1/4 mile. It was driven by Dave Strickler.
Perhaps you need to retake Camaro History 101.
Actually when Gibb found out the MSRP, he demanded GM take most of them back. Many were recirculated amoung the other hipo Camaro dealers.
BU*****T! The runway stripes only came on the Z/28. The SS got the "bumble" stripe across the nose in 1967 and early 1968. Later in 68 the stripe across the nose hooked and came down the center of the fenders, and in 1969 the SS had the optional hockey stripe. However the double runway stripes that so erroneously get attributed to SS only came on the Z/28 and the 69 Indy Pace car.
WRONG AGAIN! The Z/28 did not merely have a 283 crank. While it shared dimensions it was a hardened crank specific for the Z/28 and only the Z/28.
OLD RELIABLE (a Z/28) was the 1968 NHRA Super Stock World Champ. It ran 11.70s in the 1/4 mile. It was driven by Dave Strickler.
Perhaps you need to retake Camaro History 101.
BU*****T! The runway stripes only came on the Z/28. The SS got the "bumble" stripe across the nose in 1967 and early 1968. Later in 68 the stripe across the nose hooked and came down the center of the fenders, and in 1969 the SS had the optional hockey stripe. However the double runway stripes that so erroneously get attributed to SS only came on the Z/28 and the 69 Indy Pace car.
WRONG AGAIN! The Z/28 did not merely have a 283 crank. While it shared dimensions it was a hardened crank specific for the Z/28 and only the Z/28.
OLD RELIABLE (a Z/28) was the 1968 NHRA Super Stock World Champ. It ran 11.70s in the 1/4 mile. It was driven by Dave Strickler.
Perhaps you need to retake Camaro History 101.

There were a couple of acid-dipped Vega bodies that never got used rotting away in the parking lot. I think they were working on Pro-stock Monzas the last time I was there.
Just for an idea of what the SS was...
My Dad ordered his '68 SS 396/325hp(L35) Camaro; Corvette Bronze with a black stripe across the nose that came down the sides to the ends of the doors.
And had a black rear facia 2-division brake lights with chrome surrounds, twin chrome vent ports on the flat hood, "SS" emblems on the grille, fenders, and gas cap.
It came with dual exhaust with turbo mufflers, a Muncie 4spd and positraction.
It was a hard-top with a spoiler and Camaro "knock-off" style centercaps on GM ralleyes and skinny Red-Line tires. (Swapped for Uniroyal Super Wide Ovals after a couple of weeks with "near ZERO" traction.) And had multi-leaf springs and staggered shocks, which didn't stop the wheel hop induced by the torquey Big Block, as intended.
Inside; it hade a woodgrain dash center and console wrapped around a "Hurst" shifter and an "SS" steering wheel. It had Black "leather"(?) seats and black carpet, and rest of dash and interior. Roll down 1/4 windows and "no" wing corner window, ofcourse.
After a couple of months of 4500+rpm launches, the cam went flat, the clutch was fried twice necessitating mods..he said it was hard to hook up, really hard.
After a Crane Fireball cam, rejet on the big Holley, and an HD clutch set up plus some slapper traction bars, he was getting air under the front tires regularly!
He road raced many other Camaro's, and said no small block beat him even stock...tho he admitted to never running a 302/HO.
Remember tho, big blocks have bigger everything; intakes, headers, heads, valves, pistons, TORQUE etc...
I've ridden in some fast cars, and his was no joke! Definitely faster than 15 seconds, even stock...
And, not every Z28 came with DZ motors, true?..
Nice article.
My Dad ordered his '68 SS 396/325hp(L35) Camaro; Corvette Bronze with a black stripe across the nose that came down the sides to the ends of the doors.
And had a black rear facia 2-division brake lights with chrome surrounds, twin chrome vent ports on the flat hood, "SS" emblems on the grille, fenders, and gas cap.
It came with dual exhaust with turbo mufflers, a Muncie 4spd and positraction.
It was a hard-top with a spoiler and Camaro "knock-off" style centercaps on GM ralleyes and skinny Red-Line tires. (Swapped for Uniroyal Super Wide Ovals after a couple of weeks with "near ZERO" traction.) And had multi-leaf springs and staggered shocks, which didn't stop the wheel hop induced by the torquey Big Block, as intended.
Inside; it hade a woodgrain dash center and console wrapped around a "Hurst" shifter and an "SS" steering wheel. It had Black "leather"(?) seats and black carpet, and rest of dash and interior. Roll down 1/4 windows and "no" wing corner window, ofcourse.
After a couple of months of 4500+rpm launches, the cam went flat, the clutch was fried twice necessitating mods..he said it was hard to hook up, really hard.
After a Crane Fireball cam, rejet on the big Holley, and an HD clutch set up plus some slapper traction bars, he was getting air under the front tires regularly!
He road raced many other Camaro's, and said no small block beat him even stock...tho he admitted to never running a 302/HO.
Remember tho, big blocks have bigger everything; intakes, headers, heads, valves, pistons, TORQUE etc...
I've ridden in some fast cars, and his was no joke! Definitely faster than 15 seconds, even stock...
And, not every Z28 came with DZ motors, true?..
During the 1968 season, "THE OLD RELIABLE" Z/28 ran elapsed times of 11.70's at 116 mph keeping up with many Super Stock 396 Camaros!
Last edited by 90rocz; Jan 6, 2007 at 12:28 AM.
I see the "SS" as many have said; H.O. drive train, optioned as you like...I just worry about the pricing also, of an all out Z28. If they can keep around GTO's range, I believe they can sell plenty!
you mean 4 on the floor like the Z/28? Wasnt that what Reggie Jacksons was? Two prototypes with graphics had been done up for these cars but neither hit production.
A Yenko WAS a ZL-1 The 201 ZL1 Yenkos are not counted in the 1969 69 COPO ZL1 cars. They were COPOs that got Yenko stickers when they got to Don Yenkos lot. Originally he did his own engine swaps but not in 69. So yes that would be a good comparison. Though maybe a better ZL1 comparison would be a Boss 429? I dont know.
False. Thats how you tell a true Z/28. And matching that DZ's partial VIN to the bodys VIN. Its the only way you can. DZ is in the engine code.
A Yenko WAS a ZL-1 The 201 ZL1 Yenkos are not counted in the 1969 69 COPO ZL1 cars. They were COPOs that got Yenko stickers when they got to Don Yenkos lot. Originally he did his own engine swaps but not in 69. So yes that would be a good comparison. Though maybe a better ZL1 comparison would be a Boss 429? I dont know.
False. Thats how you tell a true Z/28. And matching that DZ's partial VIN to the bodys VIN. Its the only way you can. DZ is in the engine code.
Last edited by 5thgen69camaro; Jan 6, 2007 at 10:13 AM.
A Yenko WAS a ZL-1 The 201 ZL1 Yenkos are not counted in the 1969 69 COPO ZL1 cars. They were COPOs that got Yenko stickers when they got to Don Yenkos lot. Originally he did his own engine swaps but not in 69. So yes that would be a good comparison. Though maybe a better ZL1 comparison would be a Boss 429? I dont know.
False. Thats how you tell a true Z/28. And matching that DZ's partial VIN to the bodys VIN. Its the only way you can. DZ is in the engine code.
Here's some listings I found of engine options:
L26 230ci/140HP L6 1BC - non-SS
L22 250ci/155HP L6 1BC - non-SS
Z28 302ci/290HP V8 4BC - Z-28 only (HP underrated!)
L14 307ci/200HP V8 2BC - non-SS, 1969 only
LF7 327ci/210HP V8 2BC - non-SS, eliminated during 1969
L30 327ci/275HP V8 4BC - non-SS, 1967-68 only
L65 350ci/250HP V8 2BC - non-SS, 1969 only
LM1 350ci/255HP V8 4BC - non-SS, regular fuel, 1969 only
L48 350ci/295HP V8 4BC - SS only, rated 300HP in 1969
L35 396ci/325HP V8 4BC - SS only, Q-Jet
L34 396ci/350HP V8 4BC - SS only, Q-Jet
L78 396ci/375HP V8 4BC - SS only, Holley
L78/L89 396ci/375HP V8 4BC - SS only, Holley, Al head
L72 427ci/425HP V8 4BC - COPO 9561, cast iron
ZL1 427ci/430HP V8 4BC - COPO 9560, Al block/heads
L22 250ci/155HP L6 1BC - non-SS
Z28 302ci/290HP V8 4BC - Z-28 only (HP underrated!)
L14 307ci/200HP V8 2BC - non-SS, 1969 only
LF7 327ci/210HP V8 2BC - non-SS, eliminated during 1969
L30 327ci/275HP V8 4BC - non-SS, 1967-68 only
L65 350ci/250HP V8 2BC - non-SS, 1969 only
LM1 350ci/255HP V8 4BC - non-SS, regular fuel, 1969 only
L48 350ci/295HP V8 4BC - SS only, rated 300HP in 1969
L35 396ci/325HP V8 4BC - SS only, Q-Jet
L34 396ci/350HP V8 4BC - SS only, Q-Jet
L78 396ci/375HP V8 4BC - SS only, Holley
L78/L89 396ci/375HP V8 4BC - SS only, Holley, Al head
L72 427ci/425HP V8 4BC - COPO 9561, cast iron
ZL1 427ci/430HP V8 4BC - COPO 9560, Al block/heads
Also, 302's weren't the only motors underrated...
And to have a "true to original" Z28, we'd have to have a 5.3L that makes like 450hp @ 6800rpm or so, since displacement and weight are major concerns.
Last edited by 90rocz; Jan 6, 2007 at 04:35 PM.
Originally Posted by jg95z28
A better comparison for the big block Shelby would be a Yenko,
A better comparison for the big block Shelby would be a Yenko,
http://www.yenko.net/
That is only true for 1969. 1967 Z/28s had engine codes "MO" or "MP" (w/ A.I.R. pump) with the small journal 302. All 1968 Z/28s had engine code "MO".



