Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

02 Trans AM vs. 350Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #91  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by yellavette
There were a lot of M6's at our meets as well. Typically they trap about 101-102. I think rule of thumb is an extra 5% loss for A4's. However, according to autoweek, there's more drivetrain loss with LRA than IRS. I've always heard it like you, IRS used up a little more hp, but Autoweek had a 2 page tech story saying just the opposite, so I'm not sure on that one. But the Corvette's weight advantage should overcome any losses with tranny. And I cut consistent 1.8's-1.9's and have 150 + passes under my belt, so it's not driving. Whatever it is that's causing it, I'd like to bottle and sell it!
Well I have gone on multiple days and trapped 103,104,105 consistently. On that one day it was 105-108.

I am done talking about this, I know what I ran, I have the timeslips to prove it. If you don't want to believe me I could care less.
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #92  
SS02's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
Well Said...well said indeed!!!!
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 10:45 PM
  #93  
yellavette's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 26
From: Irmo, S.C
I didn't even mention you.

Originally Posted by buzz12586
Well I have gone on multiple days and trapped 103,104,105 consistently. On that one day it was 105-108.

I am done talking about this, I know what I ran, I have the timeslips to prove it. If you don't want to believe me I could care less.
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 10:49 PM
  #94  
yellavette's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 26
From: Irmo, S.C
Yeah, like I said. Not typical but not impossible. That was my whole point The what if's I listed are realistic though...not a nail in the tire. There are plenty of high mileage a4 verts running around that aren't running low 13's like most LS1's. There's no one here that spends a lot of time at the track that will honestly say they've never seen a high 13/low 14 second LS1. If that car runs into an atypically fast 350z (there are a few people turning 13.7's), it'd be a close race. Average vs. average the LS1 wins by a landslide....but that's not always the way things work.

Originally Posted by SSlither
I understand what you're saying....but that is kinda playing the "what if" card a little much. I mean when I comment on what I think will happen between cars, I don't take into account the "what ifs". I like to base my opinions on the average of what I see over and over. I mean, I would get raped by a Viper, but "what if" the driver had hit a nail before he raced me, then blew a tire, leaving me with a 50 car win. I just really try to base hypotheticals on the average vs the average. I don't know the truth about what will or could happen due to my magic ball being out of order! All I am saying is that I really feel the best way to judge what will happen is to base what the average of what has happened! So this being said, I think that it is a ridiculous thing to say that the LS1 will "eek" out a 350Z, when all I have ever seen is the 350Z being embarrassed!

Last edited by yellavette; Feb 20, 2007 at 11:00 PM.
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 10:58 PM
  #95  
yellavette's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 26
From: Irmo, S.C
Oops. I edited after you posted.

Originally Posted by SSlither
Okay got ya, I was just stretching the whole "what if" card!
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 12:13 PM
  #96  
yellavette's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 26
From: Irmo, S.C
Yeah. Average vs. average the LS1 will tear the 350 a new assh*le. Been there, done that

Originally Posted by SSlither
Okay got ya, I was just stretching the whole "what if" card! I completely understand what you are saying and I agree 100%. All I was saying is, to make the comment that Canada did, without giving the variables, is plain ridiculous. Also to say that you "certainly won't destroy him", is plain ludicrous. If he was to put it how you did, than I would've agreed.

*edit* - fixed!
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 07:54 PM
  #97  
95Z28LT1-PA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 279
From: Mountain Top, Pennsylvania
I trap 101.2 mph and I've got an LT1...What's the deal with the LS1's, they runnin real ****ty?
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 11:40 AM
  #98  
SS02's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 08:16 PM
  #99  
yellavette's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 26
From: Irmo, S.C
Like every other car, you've got fast ones and slow ones. Obviously a high mileage vert with a4 and 2.73's is going to be a good bit slower than a low mileage 6 spd hard top with better gears.

Originally Posted by 95Z28LT1-PA
I trap 101.2 mph and I've got an LT1...What's the deal with the LS1's, they runnin real ****ty?
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 11:57 PM
  #100  
John M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 11
From: Milledgeville, GA
A local guy had a 98 Camaro with an auto and 2.73's.
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 06:16 AM
  #101  
Ellis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 89
From: Lake Worth, FL
Friend of mine has an A4 with 2.73s too. Dogs him down off the line.
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #102  
John M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 11
From: Milledgeville, GA
Yep - he's a bracket racer and ran consistent 14.10s @ 100-101.
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #103  
yellavette's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 26
From: Irmo, S.C
Ouch. Helps make my point though, this is the guy who might have to worry about a 350.

Btw John, where is Milledgeville? How far are you from Columbus or Atl dragway?

Originally Posted by John M
Yep - he's a bracket racer and ran consistent 14.10s @ 100-101.

Last edited by yellavette; Feb 28, 2007 at 11:28 AM.
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #104  
2000slp2768's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 127
wow sorry Im late to this thread.

Here's some videos of a 350z owned by a guy I work with. In the race from a dig please remember I didnt launch, I left the line easy. I pulled even at around 80 and then just pulled away from there.



sorry its so dark but you can see what happened. This race was from a 40 roll. I let him pick the speed. And sorry about the screechy voice at the begining








and before someone says something about the time in my sig keep in miond this is at 3000ft and around 90*.
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 12:21 PM
  #105  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally Posted by SSlither
Honestly, I didn't know any LS1's that came with 2.73's? ..... Wow, that sucks! Are these Z28's?
Have you been living with your head in the sand?! I'd bet you at least HALF of the automatic Z28's/TA's out there have 2.73's in them. Mine did!

Originally Posted by John M
A local guy had a 98 Camaro with an auto and 2.73's ..... he's a bracket racer and ran consistent 14.10s @ 100-101.
Originally Posted by Ellis
Friend of mine has an A4 with 2.73s too. Dogs him down off the line.
I'll admit, when my car was brand new (barely had ~1000 miles on it) I ran it and only got 14.0 - 14.1 @ 101 mph . I was pi$$ed because I thought I had a 13-second car, yet it only ran 14's!

BUT, the following summer, after putting a few more miles on the car (figure everything needs to be "broken in", including engine, tranny, bearings, etc.) I went down to the track and ran the 13.434 @ 105.80 posted in my sig . The ONLY thing on my car then was the lid (which I put on right when I bought my car, and still only ran 14.1 ) so it wasn't what brought me down over ~1/2 a second .

Robvas also had an '02 Z28, A4/2.73's, and he ran a 13.008 @ 108, bone stock!

2.73's aren't "teh suk" like people think they are .



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 PM.