? on Record RWHP on a stock bottom LT1 N/A, Hows 452!
Originally posted by LTOne4Fun
Eric has a badass whittling stick he uses on his heads, and Joes uses special pressure treated lumber for his cam cores, rotating mass reduction is his key to power. Lose the BS, and go faster
When yall gonna be ready fr this set of LS1 heads sittin here?
Eric has a badass whittling stick he uses on his heads, and Joes uses special pressure treated lumber for his cam cores, rotating mass reduction is his key to power. Lose the BS, and go faster

When yall gonna be ready fr this set of LS1 heads sittin here?
. Maybe I should try me one of those fancy lumber sticks in my silver turd?
450 hp sure beats the heck outta my garage-ported 350 hp
Very nice numbers. I'm glad to see the lt1 world stepping up with the ls1 guys. Its like nothing was really developed or tested with these cars untill the ls1s started kicking our butts. Now we have NA 23 deg lt1 heads hanging with the bad *** big bore 15 deg ls1 cars. Think what joes car could do with a 15 deg head.
I know when the weather gets good my car will go into the 10s...hopeing for a 10.7s at 126ish. I'm also a gm casting lt1 headed car(no afrs etc....worked stock heads) but just a 355...no stroker and a 6 speed. Glad to see the lt1 cars stepping up and doing the deal.
Joe...one question..what are you guys doing to the lt1 intakes...I would like to know as I'm gonna be battling the ls1s in modified stock at the thunder shootout. I know I'm outgunned but gonna give em hell. All help would be appreciated..hehehe.
I know when the weather gets good my car will go into the 10s...hopeing for a 10.7s at 126ish. I'm also a gm casting lt1 headed car(no afrs etc....worked stock heads) but just a 355...no stroker and a 6 speed. Glad to see the lt1 cars stepping up and doing the deal.Joe...one question..what are you guys doing to the lt1 intakes...I would like to know as I'm gonna be battling the ls1s in modified stock at the thunder shootout. I know I'm outgunned but gonna give em hell. All help would be appreciated..hehehe.
yea..its pretty big..but you would be really suprised how tame it sounds at idle and how well it drives. I know with some good afrs I have alot of hp left on the table with this cam...but I want to see how far I can take a small cubed lt1 headed car.
Originally posted by 95Bird
yea..its pretty big..but you would be really suprised how tame it sounds at idle and how well it drives. I know with some good afrs I have alot of hp left on the table with this cam...but I want to see how far I can take a small cubed lt1 headed car.
yea..its pretty big..but you would be really suprised how tame it sounds at idle and how well it drives. I know with some good afrs I have alot of hp left on the table with this cam...but I want to see how far I can take a small cubed lt1 headed car.
FWIW, the Dyno Dynamics can be loaded to make higher or lower numbers than the Dynojet. Then you have STD vs SAE corrections. I have a hunch you'd probably see lower 400s SAE corrected on a dynojet but who cares, its still awesome power!
Gary, this is Luke aka. get_sum
we need to take your car to Abacus to put all this B.S. to rest..
I'll bring the beer to celebrate...
come to think about it.. there will even be more skeptics then though...
Luke
we need to take your car to Abacus to put all this B.S. to rest..
I'll bring the beer to celebrate...
come to think about it.. there will even be more skeptics then though...Luke
I did some checking on the dynamic dyno in question....being i could really care less since we gained from 419 to 452 on the same dyno and that was my goal..
I still however did extensive digging to satisfy my own mind...seems the dynamics dyno and mustang dyno read about the same ....hence lower than than standard dynojet...So who knows unless the operator has compensated for the differential between the two ...Its possible it may be higher on a different dyno...Boy would that make the chaffeing some are getting from this thread get real bad in hurry...
I still however did extensive digging to satisfy my own mind...seems the dynamics dyno and mustang dyno read about the same ....hence lower than than standard dynojet...So who knows unless the operator has compensated for the differential between the two ...Its possible it may be higher on a different dyno...Boy would that make the chaffeing some are getting from this thread get real bad in hurry...
Originally posted by Joes94TA
I did some checking on the dynamic dyno in question....being i could really care less since we gained from 419 to 452 on the same dyno and that was my goal..
I still however did extensive digging to satisfy my own mind...seems the dynamics dyno and mustang dyno read about the same ....hence lower than than standard dynojet...So who knows unless the operator has compensated for the differential between the two ...Its possible it may be higher on a different dyno...Boy would that make the chaffeing some are getting from this thread get real bad in hurry...
I did some checking on the dynamic dyno in question....being i could really care less since we gained from 419 to 452 on the same dyno and that was my goal..
I still however did extensive digging to satisfy my own mind...seems the dynamics dyno and mustang dyno read about the same ....hence lower than than standard dynojet...So who knows unless the operator has compensated for the differential between the two ...Its possible it may be higher on a different dyno...Boy would that make the chaffeing some are getting from this thread get real bad in hurry...
All i gotta sday is those 2 cars are hella fast, They make my 12.41 bolt-on car look bad. However mine is under the knife now too!
Originally posted by Dr.Mudge
That is one stripped Honda for them to lose 800-1000 pounds.
That is one stripped Honda for them to lose 800-1000 pounds.



Nice numbers. A dynojet would be nice cuz most people on here use that, so it makes a better comparison. Congrats.