? on Record RWHP on a stock bottom LT1 N/A, Hows 452!
07-07-2003, 06:14 PM
#31
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: VA
Posts: 185
Originally posted by 97bowtie
That's ridiculous - kickass numbers man!
I'm curious how the ports have been shaped - there is more than just volume coming into play w/those heads. You guys are definitely breaking new ground.
That's ridiculous - kickass numbers man!
I'm curious how the ports have been shaped - there is more than just volume coming into play w/those heads. You guys are definitely breaking new ground.
07-07-2003, 06:15 PM
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,148
Originally posted by Quickshotkimber
This dyno has been showing a little less than the dynojet in our area and they are corrected #s!
This dyno has been showing a little less than the dynojet in our area and they are corrected #s!
07-07-2003, 06:17 PM
#35
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: sarasota, fl
Posts: 2,456
Originally posted by Dr.Mudge
Stock tune, 400 RWHP but shows less than a DynoJet? I'd have to see that to believe it. What kind of injectors?
Stock tune, 400 RWHP but shows less than a DynoJet? I'd have to see that to believe it. What kind of injectors?
am i wrong?
07-07-2003, 06:19 PM
#36
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: VA
Posts: 185
Originally posted by Mindgame
1) Did Eric port the intake?
Yes
2) Is the cam hydraulic and if so, I bet the lift is below .600?
Yes and maybe.
3) Stock LT4 valve sizes or no?
2.05 and 1.60 or 1.65 I forgot on the exhaust. :thinking:
4) Stock throttle body or no?
No, TPiS 58mm TB
5) Any idea on idle vacuum and at what rpm?
Nice try I don't know really.
That's it.
Thanks.
-Mindgame
1) Did Eric port the intake?
Yes
2) Is the cam hydraulic and if so, I bet the lift is below .600?
Yes and maybe.
3) Stock LT4 valve sizes or no?
2.05 and 1.60 or 1.65 I forgot on the exhaust. :thinking:
4) Stock throttle body or no?
No, TPiS 58mm TB
5) Any idea on idle vacuum and at what rpm?
Nice try
I don't know really. That's it.
Thanks.
-Mindgame
07-07-2003, 06:21 PM
#37
Advanced Tech Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nashville
Posts: 2,262
Originally posted by got_hp?
thats another issue that needs to be addressed............i think the stock injectors would have problems supplying anything over 400rwhp.
am i wrong?
thats another issue that needs to be addressed............i think the stock injectors would have problems supplying anything over 400rwhp.
am i wrong?
130%+ duty cycle
07-07-2003, 06:22 PM
#38
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: In a house by the bay
Posts: 2,985
Yeah, I knew the SAE corrected guys were gonna pop out. Never got that asked on my numbers but for the record, they were corrected too.
I understand the secrecy thing, and that's quite good enough, thanks.
-Mindgame
I understand the secrecy thing, and that's quite good enough, thanks.
-Mindgame
07-07-2003, 06:33 PM
#40
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Portsmouth,VA
Posts: 336
Originally posted by Dr.Mudge
Stock tune, 400 RWHP but shows less than a DynoJet? I'd have to see that to believe it. What kind of injectors?
Stock tune, 400 RWHP but shows less than a DynoJet? I'd have to see that to believe it. What kind of injectors?
I have holley 30lb injectors.
I have a great set of heads and intake ported by Eric as well with a custom cam from Joe. It's strong enough to walk the heck out of a 02 zod from a roll! Not bad for an a4 with a 3600 stall.
07-07-2003, 06:37 PM
#42
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: VA
Posts: 185
You guys asking about the 114 MPH trap. While you're asking how about asking what those other cars weight? 3750 here and getting 1.98 60's. I'm a believer that the faster you are off the line the faster you are moving at the end of the 1/4 too.
It's called momentum.
I'm happy with my pokey 114.
It's called momentum.
I'm happy with my pokey 114.
07-07-2003, 06:43 PM
#43
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 786
LOL
Well yeah it's corrected.. but to what is the question.
Certainly doable, 525hp from 350cid should happen more often IMO. As far as the dyno itself though, im sure it's low just like everyone's flowbench =P. Why not head over to Woodbridge Dynotech & put it on their dynojet? Christian may get you on it for next to nothing if you ask nice.
Well yeah it's corrected.. but to what is the question.
Certainly doable, 525hp from 350cid should happen more often IMO. As far as the dyno itself though, im sure it's low just like everyone's flowbench =P. Why not head over to Woodbridge Dynotech & put it on their dynojet? Christian may get you on it for next to nothing if you ask nice
.
07-07-2003, 06:46 PM
#44
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: In a house by the bay
Posts: 2,985
Originally posted by 97 WS6 T/A Conv
Dude, If the guys get you 399 and 452 to the rears are you gonna bitch? Didn't think so. 
If others haven't had work done how can they give an opinion one way or another. And did you even bother to look at Joes website? 9.8's all motor has got to tell you something, and he's only going to get faster.
Tell you what head over to LS1.com or even LS1tech.com and ask the big dogs if they know who Joe is, they know him believe me and they will know if anyone is gonna pull 452 on a stock bottom end it will be the same guy pulling 9.8 1/4s N/A with an LT1 at about 388 cubes I think.
I know it's hard to believe but a couple more cars and you'll see. I'm just happy to have one of their cars........NOW!!!!
There's another one coming.........................
Dude, If the guys get you 399 and 452 to the rears are you gonna bitch?
Didn't think so. If others haven't had work done how can they give an opinion one way or another. And did you even bother to look at Joes website? 9.8's all motor has got to tell you something, and he's only going to get faster.Tell you what head over to LS1.com or even LS1tech.com and ask the big dogs if they know who Joe is, they know him believe me and they will know if anyone is gonna pull 452 on a stock bottom end it will be the same guy pulling 9.8 1/4s N/A with an LT1 at about 388 cubes I think.
I know it's hard to believe but a couple more cars and you'll see. I'm just happy to have one of their cars........NOW!!!!
There's another one coming.........................
What I'm trying to say is this.... there are people on this board who have praised their own efforts and efforts of those they deem to be "Gods". I personally will give praise anywhere I believe it's due, regardless of the person. It will be interesting to see if those same people will do the same. Then we have this, "Seen it, done it" crowd. Overall this board is one of the worst I've been to as far as attitudes go.... maybe it's an f-body thing but the guys who claim to be the "big guys" around here are not much on praising the efforts of others..... sad to say.
And yes, I know well who Joe is. There was a little fast n/a discussion here a short while back where Joe gave us some details on his combination. He seemed like a very cool guy to me and someone I wouldn't have a problem doing business with at all. I also know quite a few very fast racers outside the f-body circle as I've been at this for some time. Most are very cool guys as well.
Congrats and good luck.
-Mindgame
07-07-2003, 06:46 PM
#45
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,148
The big question for me is the dyno company I never heard of about until today, has an incomplete website but says that everyone should be like them, yada yada. Like comparing a Mustang dyno to a DynoJet, its hard to know how to compare when nobody has heard of the thing. I tried looking for tech data and half thier site is incomplete.