maf translator tune
ok guy i have a maf translator and trying to get started the proble is that the conections it has were the wrong 1 so i hard wired it so when i plug it into the MAF it throws a code don't know which 1 because i have nothing to check it with. This is for a 94 Camaro LT1. The translator has 4 switches.
Switch 1: On=6 cylinder Off=8 cylinder
Switch 2: On=Old style ECM(Turbo V6,TPI V8) Off=New style PCM(LT1,LS1,SC3800,Truck
Switch 3: On=Output signal limited(blocks DTC Code 102 on OBDII vehicles)
Should also be set to ON for Grand Nation/ retrofit vehicles that are NOT running extender chips
Switch 4: 'Late model vehicles: ON=85 mm MAF on cars that were originally equipped with 3.5"
Ok iI know switches 1 & 2 should be off but what about 3&4???????
I wuld appriaciate if u guys could really help me!!!!!!!
Switch 1: On=6 cylinder Off=8 cylinder
Switch 2: On=Old style ECM(Turbo V6,TPI V8) Off=New style PCM(LT1,LS1,SC3800,Truck
Switch 3: On=Output signal limited(blocks DTC Code 102 on OBDII vehicles)
Should also be set to ON for Grand Nation/ retrofit vehicles that are NOT running extender chips
Switch 4: 'Late model vehicles: ON=85 mm MAF on cars that were originally equipped with 3.5"
Ok iI know switches 1 & 2 should be off but what about 3&4???????
I wuld appriaciate if u guys could really help me!!!!!!!
Re: maf translator tune
Originally Posted by 94 BIGRED
Switch 3: On=Output signal limited(blocks DTC Code 102 on OBDII vehicles)
Should also be set to ON for Grand Nation/ retrofit vehicles that are NOT running extender chips
Switch 4: 'Late model vehicles: ON=85 mm MAF on cars that were originally equipped with 3.5"
Should also be set to ON for Grand Nation/ retrofit vehicles that are NOT running extender chips
Switch 4: 'Late model vehicles: ON=85 mm MAF on cars that were originally equipped with 3.5"
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carguyshu
Parts For Sale
20
Jan 22, 2017 11:19 AM
IgorT.455/406
LT1 Based Engine Tech
4
Mar 12, 2015 03:39 AM
MIGHTYMOUSE
Car Audio and Electronics
5
Aug 29, 2002 09:18 AM



