LT1 "cam only" dyno record
Banned
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: LT1 "cam only" dyno record
Jon's old setup was just a cam/valvetrain, CAI headers and tuning too so all the other add ons were not there.
I think his new setup should be pretty good as well, which I think he just got in the mail. ;-)
Bret
I think his new setup should be pretty good as well, which I think he just got in the mail. ;-)
Bret
When I get it running, I'll be sure to post the numbers in both SAE and STD to keep the peanut gallery happy. 
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 230
From: HEB, TX
Re: LT1 "cam only" dyno record
Originally Posted by mad scientist
What is it? My friend dyno'd 369.8 STD in his 97 t/a. We'll get the SAE numbers to post. I have yet to see an LT1 dyno higher "cam only", standard or SAE. At any rate, if it's not the record holder then what is? Because I know there is about 15 more rwhp in my friends car.
wtf is holding you guys up? STD numbers don't mean ****
Registered User
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 274
From: Houma,Louisiana
Re: LT1 "cam only" dyno record
Owen racing my car weighs 3325. I know that unlocked my converter uses up some hp compared to a manual. And my 357 is thru mufflers and a 12bolt. I think that my Joe O cam is a pretty good stockhead cam. As far as lowend power my car will 1.48 60ft. Frank95z
Last edited by Frank95z; Sep 22, 2006 at 09:29 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 199
From: Methuen/UMass Dartmouth
Re: LT1 "cam only" dyno record
Originally Posted by mad scientist
This is real simple. Show me a real cam only dyno sheet in STD that is higher than 369.8hp and I'll shut up. Untill then, you can call me anything you want. I would be upset too if a cam only LT1 dyno'd within 15hp. Like I said not all US dyno shops use SAE. I can post dyno sheets form the same shop that used both( at different times). According to you guys, it should be easy to beat 369.8HP STD. Then stop crying and do it.
