Why I think mustangs did better then camaros
Originally posted by Z28x
I 100% agree, This is also where halo cars work. Many will say now that the Mustang is faster then the Camaro because the Supercharged Cobra is faster, yet every other V8 mustang is slower than an LS1.
I 100% agree, This is also where halo cars work. Many will say now that the Mustang is faster then the Camaro because the Supercharged Cobra is faster, yet every other V8 mustang is slower than an LS1.
Originally posted by ULTIMTEORANGESS
mustangs arent winning any quality awards and female buyers with v6s most likely arent interested in aftermarket performance parts.i could be wrong though.
i think a mustang looks like any other car on the road.Cobras and v6s also look similar to each other unless you look at them closely.
mustangs arent winning any quality awards and female buyers with v6s most likely arent interested in aftermarket performance parts.i could be wrong though.
i think a mustang looks like any other car on the road.Cobras and v6s also look similar to each other unless you look at them closely.
Originally posted by ULTIMTEORANGESS
ls1 fbodies couldve been purchased for low 20s so that wasnt much of a factor.they appeal to women who could care less how fast they are.i guess they think theyre cute.maybe they are.
ls1 fbodies couldve been purchased for low 20s so that wasnt much of a factor.they appeal to women who could care less how fast they are.i guess they think theyre cute.maybe they are.
Originally posted by ULTIMTEORANGESS
.
most stangs sold are to females.most are v6 versions.most arent interested in modding the car.
.
.
most stangs sold are to females.most are v6 versions.most arent interested in modding the car.
.
Originally posted by Bob Cosby
**sniff sniff sniff sniff**
Looks like Lounge topic, smells like Lounge topic, tastes like Lounge topic.
Must be a Lounge topic.
**sniff sniff sniff sniff**
Looks like Lounge topic, smells like Lounge topic, tastes like Lounge topic.
Must be a Lounge topic.
Originally posted by morb|d
wait, so you're saying when Ford outright ditched its 5.0 in favor of the dog that is mostly the 4.6 mod motor this is "progress" right? but when GM improves the most highly praised and celebrated engine (deservedly) in all of domestic cardome to such an extent as to justify it the "4th generation" designation, its called "not having faith".
i see. that makes perfect sense...
are you even awear of how many applications the LS1 engine and all its offspring have? or are you just another Mustang fanboy who decided to register so you can pester us with your ignorance?
wait, so you're saying when Ford outright ditched its 5.0 in favor of the dog that is mostly the 4.6 mod motor this is "progress" right? but when GM improves the most highly praised and celebrated engine (deservedly) in all of domestic cardome to such an extent as to justify it the "4th generation" designation, its called "not having faith".
i see. that makes perfect sense...
are you even awear of how many applications the LS1 engine and all its offspring have? or are you just another Mustang fanboy who decided to register so you can pester us with your ignorance?
As far as Ford goes, their biggest idiocy was releasing the mom and pop 4.6 from the towncar in the GT. They should have never released the 215 hp piece of crap in the first place.
Originally posted by RiceEating5.0
I love the assumptions thrown around on why the mustang was a sales success and the f-bod a sales failure
. They always turn out to be entertaining and some of the posts comical, lol. The most common answer (excuses actually) usually are 1)their buyers are ignorant and buy the mustang thinking it is faster. 2) all the little girls want it. 3) they only sell v6's.
Don't remember the exact figures, but i believe 63-68% of Mustang buyers were males compared to 73% or so for the camaro. But then you factor in the sheer volume and you notice that more than twice as many men bought Mustangs than Chevy sold camaros (men and women combined).
The other popular excuse is that Mustang only sells v6 models. Then you look at the numbers and you'll notice that Ford sold almost as many v8 mustangs as chevy did v6 and v8 camaro's combined.
I love the assumptions thrown around on why the mustang was a sales success and the f-bod a sales failure
. They always turn out to be entertaining and some of the posts comical, lol. The most common answer (excuses actually) usually are 1)their buyers are ignorant and buy the mustang thinking it is faster. 2) all the little girls want it. 3) they only sell v6's. Don't remember the exact figures, but i believe 63-68% of Mustang buyers were males compared to 73% or so for the camaro. But then you factor in the sheer volume and you notice that more than twice as many men bought Mustangs than Chevy sold camaros (men and women combined).
The other popular excuse is that Mustang only sells v6 models. Then you look at the numbers and you'll notice that Ford sold almost as many v8 mustangs as chevy did v6 and v8 camaro's combined.
of the board.
Originally posted by scott9050
What is with all of this Ford hate?
What is with all of this Ford hate?
btw, what's with all the GM hate on a camaro message board anyway?
Originally posted by morb|d
i was making a point of how rediculous the "lost faith" idea was.
btw, what's with all the GM hate on a camaro message board anyway?
i was making a point of how rediculous the "lost faith" idea was.
btw, what's with all the GM hate on a camaro message board anyway?
Originally posted by scott9050
Right before I moved here in 2001 I went to Crossroads Ford in Raleigh, N.C. New v-6's were starting at $13,495 and GT's started at $15,995. That is quite a bit cheaper than low 20's discounted. It's only a part of what the popularity is though.
Right before I moved here in 2001 I went to Crossroads Ford in Raleigh, N.C. New v-6's were starting at $13,495 and GT's started at $15,995. That is quite a bit cheaper than low 20's discounted. It's only a part of what the popularity is though.
theres no GTs priced that low here ever.
Originally posted by scott9050
The 01 Cobra is very very close, and the 5spd Mach I will run with or beat and LS-1 stock versus stock, depending on tranny and gearing (driver dependent)
The 01 Cobra is very very close, and the 5spd Mach I will run with or beat and LS-1 stock versus stock, depending on tranny and gearing (driver dependent)
cobra really isnt that close.mach 1 is very close.possibly equal.
Originally posted by scott9050
Where are you getting your flawed information? How many females in Mustangs have you talked to to formulate this hypothesis?
Where are you getting your flawed information? How many females in Mustangs have you talked to to formulate this hypothesis?
who have you talked to?even so,unless you have over data ill bet you cant prove that to be incorrect.
Originally posted by scott9050
I saw a report (about 8 months ago) which was discussed in the lounge that strated tjhat Males made up Approx. 70% of Mustang sales in 2001. Check out the v-6 market section. Females do indeed modify their Mustangs, not all, but quite a few do.
I saw a report (about 8 months ago) which was discussed in the lounge that strated tjhat Males made up Approx. 70% of Mustang sales in 2001. Check out the v-6 market section. Females do indeed modify their Mustangs, not all, but quite a few do.
Originally posted by ULTIMTEORANGESS
im not talking dicounted either.im talking stickered.ls1s were priced in similar price ranges as GTs with superior performance.
theres no GTs priced that low here ever.
im not talking dicounted either.im talking stickered.ls1s were priced in similar price ranges as GTs with superior performance.
theres no GTs priced that low here ever.


