I told you the prices I saw and you did not believe them. The only one babbling, going by your sentence structure, is you. Learn that first before trying to criticize me. And for your info, the base price of the Mustang was still cheaper than the f-body, that has been discussed many times on this board and you are the only one I have ever heard to dispute it.
Now here is what you said that started all of this:


You stated that low 20’s was what a LS-1 F-body could be purchased for, these are your own words. Now I stated that I have seen cheaper for GT’s right off the showroom floor (which I provided links for, 18,000 and change is cheaper than low 20,000 2 years after the death of the f-body) and you still want to argue. I hope that there is something that you are good at in life because debating sure as hell is not one of them.







The person who stated that their father bought a formula listed the discounts, or did you just miss that part? Please show me where I made it up? Are you Rain Man or something? I also did not know that you were the only participant in this thread as you think you are. Others gave info which I have responded to, one being price. And who does not believe that I am right? The only person who came to your defense was put into his place as well with concrete evidence. I suggest that you step out of the world of fantasy and join us here in reality. The man who posted above you apparently agrees with me, he stated that when he bought his f-body all of the f-bodies, v-6’s included, were more expensive than the GT’s he looked at. Is he a liar too? Is there a conspiracy against UltimateOrange who acts like he was sprayed with AgentOrange? Oh lord, the humanity……

 

Glad to not disappoint you

 

Let’s also look at what your first post in this thread was, one in which 4 separate people said you were wrong:



Now here is what 91L-98 said:


to which you replied:


Now keep in mind that I had not even entered into this thread at this point. You have not said a word about base price you said they “could be purchased for the low 20’s” which means driving off the lot for that price. This is how a real world price Mustang, which I brought up later, compared to your low 20’s f-body. I brought up the fact that I have seen GT’s in the teens which was disputed, then I provided links. Now the sites are called BS (2 largest car selling sites on the net no less) and I am being told that even though I have proven that the GT was cheaper off the showroom floor than the cheapest f-body, price had nothing to do with it. I have stated my case with facts, you with rhetoric. I win, you lose, case closed
Now if you had not tried to tell me my prices were BS and did not matter, none of this would have come to pass and thread would be on page 3 by now.

 

heres what i came up with.base for 2002 Z28 was $23,430.


02 GT.one was $23,220 and $22,965.

close right?just like i said.now i dont know what incentives were offered but im guessing there was some. do you still think they couldnt have been purchased for a similar price?of course you do.


im sure you wont be able to dig up any info on incentives or discounts.im sure its lost along with a4 ls1 1/4 times.


save the jokes and sarcasm.i didnt see rainman.


this is fun.