Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2004 Impreza WRX STi MSRP $30,995

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 06:36 PM
  #31  
bigsteve7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 499
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally posted by WERM
How can they be "worth it"? It's not like GM didn't install Wheels, Spoilers, Hoods, sway bars and badges on every other Camaro. You were getting those things anyway, and the ones on the SS weren't $4,000 "better".
You guys seem to be forgettnig the whole aspect of having an exclusive model.

I could own a 1967 Chevelle SS or a 1967 Chevelle with a 396 dropped in and SS badges. Which would you rather have? Which comands more of a price on the market? The cars have a little extra value to them. Not everyone spends their money purely for performance. Whether its worth it or not is up to the buyer.
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 06:42 PM
  #32  
redzed's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,954
Originally posted by WERM
How can they be "worth it"? It's not like GM didn't install Wheels, Spoilers, Hoods, sway bars and badges on every other Camaro. You were getting those things anyway, and the ones on the SS weren't $4,000 "better".
I'm looking at what those modifications meant for performance. Even with a 200lb weight disadvantage, a SS could nearly match the lap-times of a pre-Z06 Corvette. On the track, the Camaro SS was worth every penny. Say what you want, but a Z28 with the performance suspension option still wasn't nearly the equal of the SLP car.

That said, I didn't buy my Z28 to drive on the track. I liked the hood scoop on the SS, but the rest of the package left me cold. There again, I'm the sort of wierdo who actually ordered the 2.73 rear end and base Eagle GAs.

For the people who actually cared about on-track handling, the only downside of the SS was that the capabilities of the chassis were in excess of the available power. The Camaro SS could easy have taken a 400hp LS-6 without the need for any suspension or braking upgrades.

Worth it? Duh.
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 10:46 PM
  #33  
l_bilyk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 94
From: Mississauga Ont.
If GM made the G6 it would steal so many sale away from this car.
if if if.... i'm sure GM could do it but it will never happen... why would they? they killed off the camaro and are platform sharing the vette!

as far as the STi being worth it? yes.. it is
it's definately worth it... 75 extra hp might not be much because you can just crank up the boost on a regular WRX and make the same power... BUT you get essentially a stoker kit, a reinforced block, the TD04 is replaced with an IHI VF series turbo, mylobdenum coated pistons, a few other internal tweaks i cant remember plus the suspension and tires package

from a tuning standpoint, you can do alot more with an STi then a regular WRX... so yeah, it's worth it
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 12:27 AM
  #34  
Butterfingers's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8
Not to mention that the STI has a semi closed deck block for added strength.

Dont underestimate AWD turbo cars. Sombody has already got the new lancers to run 12.5 in the 1/4 mi with just bolt on parts. They pull near 1 G stock.

http://www.clubwrx.net/forums/showth...&highlight=evo

I expect the STI to turn even better times with simple mods given its larger displacement. Given about $1500 in mods these two cars would absolutely RAPE even the almighty zo6 on the street.

Really cant argue with numbers. You can even drive these cars year round.

Last edited by Butterfingers; Apr 27, 2003 at 12:30 AM.
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 09:11 AM
  #35  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by redzed
I'm looking at what those modifications meant for performance. Even with a 200lb weight disadvantage, a SS could nearly match the lap-times of a pre-Z06 Corvette. On the track, the Camaro SS was worth every penny. Say what you want, but a Z28 with the performance suspension option still wasn't nearly the equal of the SLP car.

That said, I didn't buy my Z28 to drive on the track. I liked the hood scoop on the SS, but the rest of the package left me cold. There again, I'm the sort of wierdo who actually ordered the 2.73 rear end and base Eagle GAs.

For the people who actually cared about on-track handling, the only downside of the SS was that the capabilities of the chassis were in excess of the available power. The Camaro SS could easy have taken a 400hp LS-6 without the need for any suspension or braking upgrades.

Worth it? Duh.
I never said the SS wasn't better. But installing $400 worth of more expensive parts and charging $4,000 doesn't seem like a value to me. They give away ram-air on Grand Am GT's, so why again should it cost so much on say, a Firebird? Almost every other performance car had 17" wheels as standard or an option, but on Camaro you had to buy an SS. You could say exclusivity, but SS was limited only by how many they could sell. Other than the fact that the Z28 was dulled down to look like a base model, what made the SS package worth it? I don't see much.

You didn't have to pay $30,000 to get a good looking Mustang (if you did, you at least got a unique engine). And people wondered why they sold more Mustang GT's than Camaros...
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 09:39 AM
  #36  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
What Subaru has done with the WRX and STi is little different than what Detroit has done with its cars for the last 40 years or so - take a relatively ho-hum base model, dress it up with some honest performance parts (many of which draw from factory racing efforts), and sell that vehicle with a healthy profit margin. The end customer ends up with a somewhat-exclusive car with healthy performance, so he thinks he's getting a bargain, and the OEM ends up with a nice "halo" vehicle that draws people into showroom.

Open up your minds a bit, and the STi is a hell of a lot like a top-of-the-line late-60s musclecar. The performance is there, the racing heritage is there, and frankly the base Impreza ain't that bad of a car so you still end up with a practical, usable vehicle.
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 05:35 PM
  #37  
redzed's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,954
Originally posted by WERM
I never said the SS wasn't better. But installing $400 worth of more expensive parts and charging $4,000 doesn't seem like a value to me. They give away ram-air on Grand Am GT's, so why again should it cost so much on say, a Firebird? Almost every other performance car had 17" wheels as standard or an option, but on Camaro you had to buy an SS. You could say exclusivity, but SS was limited only by how many they could sell. Other than the fact that the Z28 was dulled down to look like a base model, what made the SS package worth it? I don't see much.

You didn't have to pay $30,000 to get a good looking Mustang (if you did, you at least got a unique engine). And people wondered why they sold more Mustang GT's than Camaros...
Are you saying the SS amounted to $400 worth of parts? I couldn't do a tire/wheel upgrade on my Z28 for less than $1,000! Furthermore, don't confuse the "Ram-Air" on a Grand Am GT with full-monty SLP conversion.

Anyway, it would be fair to say that the Z28 Camaro will be the last 300hp+ muscle car to have 16 inch tires. I was just as happy that my Z28 had a relatively high-profile tires because I valued a degree of ride comfort. Judging by the number of luxury cars with 18" rims and 45-profile tires, ride comfort doesn't have to suffer because of performance rubber. There again, most of those cars have way more wheel travel than the F-body, and alot more sophisticated shock absorber valving.

Finally, I'm sick of arguing the "cheap" Mustang GT vs. "expensive" Z28 arguement. The F4 is dead, and so is the value arguement. If you're saying that only the Camaro SS could compete with the GT on the basis of styling...

Time moves on, and the Dodge SRT-4 has taken up the cheap performance mantle. Maybe its time for us to argue Mustang GT versus Insane Turbo Neon. The little Dodge even has 17" rims.
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 06:01 PM
  #38  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally posted by MunchE
Yeah I was comparing the WRX to the WRX STi. Stock WRX is 225 hp, WRX STi is 300hp. Not to mention that the engine is actually different (2.5L vs. 2.0L).

I agree that the Camaro SS package is a lot of money for not a whole lot of stuff. I'd still want one if I had an LS-1 tho, the scoop makes them look so much better. :-D
Had Camaro on the brain...

But is 75 horsepower and half a second to 60 (if I'm not wrong on that) really worth $6,000?
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 06:10 PM
  #39  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally posted by redzed
I'm looking at what those modifications meant for performance. Even with a 200lb weight disadvantage, a SS could nearly match the lap-times of a pre-Z06 Corvette. On the track, the Camaro SS was worth every penny. Say what you want, but a Z28 with the performance suspension option still wasn't nearly the equal of the SLP car.

That said, I didn't buy my Z28 to drive on the track. I liked the hood scoop on the SS, but the rest of the package left me cold. There again, I'm the sort of wierdo who actually ordered the 2.73 rear end and base Eagle GAs.

For the people who actually cared about on-track handling, the only downside of the SS was that the capabilities of the chassis were in excess of the available power. The Camaro SS could easy have taken a 400hp LS-6 without the need for any suspension or braking upgrades.

Worth it? Duh.
Actually... Redplanet himself was actually one of the guys here who said that till the C5 got active handling, the Camaro Z28 would slightly outrun a non Z06 Corvette around the track.

Every test I ever saw of the SS and Z28 of the last few years showed next to no difference in horsepower, and though the SS rides rougher, minimal differences in handling. SS has the edge, but it still boiled down to $3-4,000 for a hoodscoop, badges and a rougher ride. Being that unlike Ford's SVT cars, Chevrolet didn't make SS a limited edition, there isn't anything exclusive about it.

Worth it?

Last edited by guionM; Apr 27, 2003 at 06:12 PM.
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 08:21 PM
  #40  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by redzed
]Are you saying the SS amounted to $400 worth of parts? I couldn't do a tire/wheel upgrade on my Z28 for less than $1,000! Furthermore, don't confuse the "Ram-Air" on a Grand Am GT with full-monty SLP conversion.
No, I'm saying the INCREMENTAL COST to General Motors to install 17" wheels and tires instead of 16's and a taller spoiler instead of a shorter one and thicker swaybars instead of thinner and one hood instead of the other, etc. is a lot closer to $400 than $4000.
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 08:25 PM
  #41  
redzed's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,954
Originally posted by WERM
No, I'm saying the INCREMENTAL COST to General Motors to install 17" wheels and tires instead of 16's and a taller spoiler instead of a shorter one and thicker swaybars instead of thinner and one hood instead of the other, etc. is a lot closer to $400 than $4000.
Not when a Z28 was pretty much completed on the assembly line then sent to SLP to become a SS.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2QUIK6
Cars For Sale
10
Sep 17, 2016 02:31 PM
93 RedBird
Fuel and Ignition
4
Nov 15, 2015 08:24 AM
cmsmith
2016+ Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and General Discussion
7
Sep 14, 2015 09:25 PM
DirtyDaveW
Parts For Sale
1
Mar 15, 2015 07:01 PM
jrp4uc
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
13
Sep 30, 2002 01:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM.