2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
View Poll Results: What concerns YOU more on the Camaro?
How much it weighs.
35.20%
How much it costs.
64.80%
Voters: 179. You may not vote on this poll

What concerns you more? Cost or weight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #226  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by jg95z28
With the state of the current economy anyone who thinks they'll be able to purchase a V8 Camaro for under $30k in 2009 is being a little foolish.
The problem with polls on websites like these is everyone says they're going to do 'x' but when it comes down to it, many don't.

I can tell you that there are a LOT of people here and elsewhere who are holding the idea that an LS3-powered Camaro will come in under $30,000. There are also those who say they will buy new in these polls, then they will see the sticker, decide it's too much and wait to buy used (no matter what the sticker actually turns out to be).

People are still in the 5th Gen honeymoon phase. Oh sure, everyone plans on buying one now, but when the car is at the dealership and it's time to .... or get off the crapper, what's going to happen? I'm not sure.

This is why I find it ironic that everyone is so concerned about cost as opposed to weight, yet most say they would spend over $30,000 for their next Camaro anyway. Which poll am I to believe?

Last edited by Z28Wilson; Jun 27, 2008 at 12:57 PM.
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #227  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by jg95z28
And your point?
My point was eloquently explained by Wilson........

Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
This is why I find it ironic that everyone is so concerned about cost as opposed to weight, yet most say they would spend over $30,000 for their next Camaro anyway. Which poll am I to believe?
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 03:53 PM
  #228  
8Banger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 362
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
This is why I find it ironic that everyone is so concerned about cost as opposed to weight,
Well, I personally think that many here don't give a crap about weight. Most here are not going to race the car, or at least not more than an occasional
dragstrip night. As far as fuel mileage and weight, obviously a correlation,
but the MPG numbers that will come in will be at or better than what many
of us drive now. So then it comes down to can I afford this car. If it goes
above 30K then I think the answer is no for many here. As far as myself goes,
I will most definitely be buying one if the car is what I think it is going to be.
You can take that to the bank.
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #229  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
And on a similar note, I was impressed when Lutz asserted that a true focus group is what someone will put in their driveway, rather than what they think would be nice to have.

Cutting a check always separates the pretenders from the players.
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #230  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by 8Banger
Well, I personally think that many here don't give a crap about weight. Most here are not going to race the car, or at least not more than an occasional
dragstrip night. As far as fuel mileage and weight, obviously a correlation,
but the MPG numbers that will come in will be at or better than what many
of us drive now. So then it comes down to can I afford this car. If it goes
above 30K then I think the answer is no for many here. As far as myself goes,
I will most definitely be buying one if the car is what I think it is going to be.
You can take that to the bank.
Whoa. A whole lot of assumption there my friend.

Originally Posted by 1fastdog
And on a similar note, I was impressed when Lutz asserted that a true focus group is what someone will put in their driveway, rather than what they think would be nice to have.

Cutting a check always separates the pretenders from the players.

And that there is undeniably the bottom line.
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 07:56 PM
  #231  
Highlander's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,082
From: San Juan PR
well.. Here a 31k g8 is costing around 45k, so not many people are buying it...

I expected a Camaro to be a tad behind in interior quality than this car and thus saving a few dollars. Other than bluetooth I don't need many things on the car interior wise. If I were to buy one I would choose the cheapest v8, but also because it would be the lightest.

Given that the car will be too heavy I will wait it off and get either a CTS-V or a z06 vette (both used).
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #232  
Highlander's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,082
From: San Juan PR
How aboutreviving this topic?

https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=588709
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #233  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by The Highlander
well.. Here a 31k g8 is costing around 45k, so not many people are buying it...
G8 sales seem to be slipping in general.
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 01:04 PM
  #234  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Originally Posted by Z284ever
I wish that I had an easy answer for you, but I don't. I believe if Zeta could have been made lighter economically, GM would have done it..
I agree with that.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
It's an architecture with a weight problem, and that's that. Sure, you could throw a whole bunch of money at it with exotic materials - but so what. Where would that take you? From 4100 lbs to 3950? BFD. This car is what it is.

Is it such a concern to me if the V8 is priced at $28,400 versus $27,950? No, not at all.

Is it a concern to me that this will be, *by far* the heaviest Camaro ever produced, just at the precise moment in time, when the market is demanding just the opposite? Oh yes it is.
Yeah thats true too. Exotic materials droping the weight just a little would be pointless. I was trying to get at what your idea of ideal would be out of my own curiousity. That is theoretically doable. I think Scott had mentioned something to the effect "We could make it light like a vette but it would be at vette prices."

So I imagine being the vette is light as possible and being that the Camaro being bigger would be slightly heavier and maybe more expensive with more material.

But a 2008 1LT comes in at $46,950 Supposing that were possible on a Camaro and could be done at the same weight. Would that be ok in theory?

Im at the point where Im considering a 1 year old SS realistically. I might snap on impulse and go new but I d love to have a new one, but Im not sure its economically feesible or responsible for me as I dont own a house yet. I have been noticing, especially lately, that some of people here make alot more than I do.

Last edited by 5thgen69camaro; Jun 28, 2008 at 01:07 PM.
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #235  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by jg95z28
...Again, the Camaro will be a MY2010 vehicle. With the state of the current economy anyone who thinks they'll be able to purchase a V8 Camaro for under $30k in 2009 is being a little foolish.....
That is pretty disappointing too. The 2009 Mustang GT has a base price of under $27k. The 2010 GT will likely still be under $28k. Camaro needs to be CLOSE to that, IMHO.

Hopefully, it will be.
Bob
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 12:09 AM
  #236  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
That is pretty disappointing too. The 2009 Mustang GT has a base price of under $27k. The 2010 GT will likely still be under $28k. Camaro needs to be CLOSE to that, IMHO.

Hopefully, it will be.
Bob
I have no certain knowledge, but my guess would be that a V8 Camaro will start under $30K. Maybe even quite abit under.

Last edited by Z284ever; Jun 29, 2008 at 12:13 AM.
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #237  
81Z28355's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 329
From: Hemlock, Mich.
Like has been posted the V-8 Camaro must start at or under 30k The Challenger offers IRS and some very nice options for 30K. Yes it is heavy but a very nice looking car.

For me GM needs to get the cost in line with both Mustang and Challenger, it cant cost more. If it does cost more I feel people will just stick with the Mustang or give the Dodge a chance.

Weight is a big concern as well, the new Camaro is not at sleek as the 4th Gen. car and will struggle to get the same MPG numbers as the previous generation did. To me not meeting or exceeding the previous cars MPG numbers is a failure on GM's part and it sounds like the deck is stacked against it.
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #238  
Highlander's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,082
From: San Juan PR
The camaro is just as heavy as the challenger...
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 10:49 AM
  #239  
81Z28355's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 329
From: Hemlock, Mich.
Originally Posted by The Highlander
The camaro is just as heavy as the challenger...

I hope you are wrong, but to post like that you must be in the know. Of course you are also saying that the Camaro is more heavy than a 4 door G8 with your statment.

A 4200lb V-8 Camaro has no place in this market. If you are correct and Camaro is that heavy, then the Challenger is twice the car. It can fit a family of 5 and has a HUGE trunk that will fit coolers and full size baby strollers if needed. If Camaro is more Mustang size with Challenger weight that is a shame.
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #240  
GoCamaroGo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 53
From: Chicagoland
Originally Posted by Z284ever
G8 sales seem to be slipping in general.
True, but it is kind of hard to know how the G8 would have sold without our economy being borderline recession. The G8 was available only after oil prices went from 2.50 to 4.00 and after the US economy went to the toilet. That impacts a lot more types of vehicle sales than just the G8. e.g. Toyota slashing their projected unit sales this year.

In addition, don't all highly anticipated, newly released, vehicles sell well out of the gate, but then recede down to an average selling rate.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 AM.