Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

Spanked a WRX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2007 | 01:03 PM
  #16  
oneclean97z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 301
From: North Houston, TX
well basically what i meant was i dont like the way the engines are set up, although i know a handfull of those cars have my respect
Old May 4, 2007 | 10:58 PM
  #17  
dueno's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 126
From: Santa Barbara, California
I dunno about Legacys but 2004 WRX engines are the worst to work on. On my friend's W an injector swap took almost 10 hours. Turbo swap wasn't so bad, took another 6. I don't even know where I would start looking for spark plugs on that motor lol. They defintely sound badass though for a 4 banger.
Old May 5, 2007 | 06:30 AM
  #18  
Camarocracy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 992
From: Youngstown, Ohio
Subaru is Japanese, not Korean.
Old May 6, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #19  
Beanboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 233
Just pop off the intake and older WRXs, the washer fluid bottle. If you want, battery and intercooler as well for changing the spark plugs. Not too much room on the plugs closest to firewall, but not too tough. Doesn't take that long at all. Maybe 45 min the first time around? Certainly beats what I've heard about replacing plugs on a f-body. How the heck do you reach the ones buried under the cowl?

Overall I'd say they are a bit easier to work on in general than most cars. Some things are harder, some easier. Nissan 350Z, now that's annoying. Same goes for many German cars. I swear the Germans design parts to look cool on a computer screen, and give no thought to what it would be like to replace the damn part five years down the road.

Last edited by Beanboy; May 6, 2007 at 12:18 PM.
Old May 6, 2007 | 07:45 PM
  #20  
IdahoLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 233
From: Boise, ID
I was at the track yesterday and the older WRX's are slow. The slowest one i saw ran a 16.xx at 89-90mph. Some others were 15.xx at 91-92ish. And there were some of the newer ones(one was an STi) that were running low 14's to high 13's at 97-102mph.

One of the STi's raced a '91 L98 Twin Turbo Callaway Corvette with 8,200 miles on the clock(6 of 10, was what the owner told me). He paid $60k for it last year. The best i saw him run was a 13.5 @107mph. I think he was babying it though.
Old May 6, 2007 | 11:09 PM
  #21  
John M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 11
From: Milledgeville, GA
I hope the 16-second one you saw was an automatic. After all, there's only so much you're going to get from 220hp and with an automatic it's no quicker than, or maybe not even as quick as, a Hyundai Sonata.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Parts For Sale
1
Mar 15, 2015 07:01 PM
dj haf
Track Kill Stories
9
Nov 18, 2003 01:36 PM
Danno
LT1 Based Engine Tech
0
Aug 7, 2003 12:14 AM
jrp4uc
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
13
Sep 30, 2002 01:34 PM
hopefullyz28
LS1 Based Engine Tech
77
Sep 19, 2002 08:49 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 AM.