2001 Mustang Bullitt vs. 1994 Z28?
02-20-2007, 09:22 PM
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Belmont North Carolina.
Posts: 594
Hey DC,
Not meaning to call you on anything, but just a freindly question.
I thought it went like this...
Fox Body 1979 - 1993 platform
SN-95 1994 - 2004 platform
S-197 2005+ platform
In all of my days I can honestly say Ive never heard of an " Edge" platform ...except from the Ford Ranger Edge series pickup trucks.
Let me know if I missed something.
02-20-2007, 09:29 PM
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Belmont North Carolina.
Posts: 594
Well, I will be damned.
I just did a little research and low and behold...
I found it. The 99-04 body design was called the New Edge look back when it hit the market in late 98.
That is what you are referring to.
Kudos
I just did a little research and low and behold...
I found it. The 99-04 body design was called the New Edge look back when it hit the market in late 98.
That is what you are referring to.
Kudos
02-21-2007, 11:30 AM
#35
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 234
The actual frame had a few minor adjustments but it was still based off from the fox yes, but the frame is not exactly the same.
heres you links to show that is was not reffered to as a sn95:
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/articl...stang-sn95.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Mu...2.80.932004.29
http://www.mustangforums.com/sn95-mustang/
ss02: I dont speak about what I dont know, so I suggest you now take that advice and do the same.
NOTE: check a few pages back as the freak question was already answered.
EDIT: yes the sn-95 does refer to the body style. It was called the fox platform for the chassis design. It remained unchanged until 99 where MINOR modifications were made to the chassis.
heres you links to show that is was not reffered to as a sn95:
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/articl...stang-sn95.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Mu...2.80.932004.29
http://www.mustangforums.com/sn95-mustang/
ss02: I dont speak about what I dont know, so I suggest you now take that advice and do the same.
NOTE: check a few pages back as the freak question was already answered.
EDIT: yes the sn-95 does refer to the body style. It was called the fox platform for the chassis design. It remained unchanged until 99 where MINOR modifications were made to the chassis.
Last edited by Demon's Camaro; 02-21-2007 at 11:38 AM.
02-21-2007, 12:29 PM
#37
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 234
Well I dont mind a friendly quarrel, but I do mind when someone chimes in with insults and dillusions of granduer.
I believe this is the second time mister ss02 that you have been completely proven wrong by a guy who knows more about mustangs.
Bob cosby in 06 ring a bell.
I believe this is the second time mister ss02 that you have been completely proven wrong by a guy who knows more about mustangs.
Bob cosby in 06 ring a bell.
02-21-2007, 06:08 PM
#38
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
LOLOL........I was just stating that it is infact called a SN-95 just like u stated above.....Dont take it personal buddy..didnt mean to hurt your feelings with the forums guy...its all good fun in here..lol........ ANd my BIG LLOYD Statement is meant in humor..like I said its all good fun and nothing makes a interesting converstation than talking about Mustangs and Camaros lol
And with the Bob COsby thing that was me misreading his thread....At which point I apoligized if u remember...
And with the Bob COsby thing that was me misreading his thread....At which point I apoligized if u remember...
Last edited by SS02; 02-21-2007 at 06:14 PM.
02-21-2007, 06:12 PM
#39
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
U know thats kinda of funny...its states that the SN-95 is gone....Then it states that the Soft lines of the EARLY Sn-95 are gone replaced by sharp lines.....My point is its still a SN-95 and its still referred to as the SN-95 style mustang by everyone...lol Except u....
02-21-2007, 11:39 PM
#43
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
NOt to...well step on your toes buddy...but uh...What exactly is the Mustang ( Factory Freak )....seriously....were talking 14 sec 1/4 timer.....hmmmmm 13.99999 lOLOLOLOLOL.....j/k man...ive owned a 2000 and 2003 GTs Full bolt-ons...272 Rwhp.....over 4k in Mods and Appearence....AND I KICK MY SELF IN THE NADS EVERYDAY FOR WASTING MY MONEY LOLOLOLOL.......DAMMIT....4k in the SS makes me a 11s Runner.....
02-22-2007, 04:39 PM
#45
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 234
Compared to LS1s yes the 2valves are slow but when you hit 4valves they keep up ET wise nicely with you boys. And the whistling ones tend to walk on by.
But then again thats why I keep a Desert Eagle under my seat. How are you going to beat me when AAA is towing your car home because of a hole in you block.
But then again thats why I keep a Desert Eagle under my seat. How are you going to beat me when AAA is towing your car home because of a hole in you block.