Mac Header Sound
Well, here are the facts. MAC's help across the whole RPM range evenly.
Take a look at my dyno chart, vs stock.
You can see from the TQ curve that the gains from the MAC's are even across the ENTIRE rpm range.
MAC Headers vs Stock
As for the sound, they sound SO much better than my stock system. I absolutely love the sound of my exhaust setup. I have the MAC's, a single high flow cat, and the Hooker catback. It's the best LT1 sound that I've found. Quiet at cruising below 2000 rpm and at idle. Step on the gas, and there is a sweet deep purring sound and it just gets better the more gas you give it.
Dan
Take a look at my dyno chart, vs stock.
You can see from the TQ curve that the gains from the MAC's are even across the ENTIRE rpm range.
MAC Headers vs Stock
As for the sound, they sound SO much better than my stock system. I absolutely love the sound of my exhaust setup. I have the MAC's, a single high flow cat, and the Hooker catback. It's the best LT1 sound that I've found. Quiet at cruising below 2000 rpm and at idle. Step on the gas, and there is a sweet deep purring sound and it just gets better the more gas you give it.
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; May 28, 2004 at 09:06 PM.
Originally posted by stereomandan
Well, here are the facts. MAC's help across the whole RPM range evenly.
Take a look at my dyno chart, vs stock.
You can see from the TQ curve that the gains from the MAC's are even across the ENTIRE rpm range.
MAC Headers vs Stock
As for the sound, they sound SO much better than my stock system. I absolutely love the sound of my exhaust setup. I have the MAC's, a single high flow cat, and the Hooker catback. It's the best LT1 sound that I've found. Quiet at cruising below 2000 rpm and at idle. Step on the gas, and there is a sweet deep purring sound and it just gets better the more gas you give it.
Dan
Well, here are the facts. MAC's help across the whole RPM range evenly.
Take a look at my dyno chart, vs stock.
You can see from the TQ curve that the gains from the MAC's are even across the ENTIRE rpm range.
MAC Headers vs Stock
As for the sound, they sound SO much better than my stock system. I absolutely love the sound of my exhaust setup. I have the MAC's, a single high flow cat, and the Hooker catback. It's the best LT1 sound that I've found. Quiet at cruising below 2000 rpm and at idle. Step on the gas, and there is a sweet deep purring sound and it just gets better the more gas you give it.
Dan
Originally posted by Dave Feerst
It will be different but it wont be like adding a cutout.
I run mac headers a gutted cat and B&B Triflo catback on my 383 and many people say its the nicest sounding LT-1/4 they have ever heard....
It will be different but it wont be like adding a cutout.
I run mac headers a gutted cat and B&B Triflo catback on my 383 and many people say its the nicest sounding LT-1/4 they have ever heard....
Originally posted by vin1382
Damn, thats an awesome gain. Especially the torque. I can't wait to get these things.
Damn, thats an awesome gain. Especially the torque. I can't wait to get these things.
Originally posted by Jeff95TA
I believe that was the gain going from completely stock to headers, cat back, & cold air, not JUST headers. Is that correct?
I believe that was the gain going from completely stock to headers, cat back, & cold air, not JUST headers. Is that correct?
Originally posted by Jeff95TA
I believe that was the gain going from completely stock to headers, cat back, & cold air, not JUST headers. Is that correct?
I believe that was the gain going from completely stock to headers, cat back, & cold air, not JUST headers. Is that correct?
Dan
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rich_z28
Car Audio and Electronics
3
Aug 29, 2002 10:44 PM



