LT1 4-bolt & 2-bolt main engines
#1
LT1 4-bolt & 2-bolt main engines
GM LT1 4-Bolt mains were used in which cars or as replacement engines?
When I bought my 97 Z28 I had the dealer do a Carfax (all was fine) and also a dealer sheet of work ever done to the car. Two months after this car was purchased by the original owner the engine was replaced with a brand new engine (no details on why, etc). Well I don't like rumors but was told when GM did warranty replacements they would often use the LT1 4-bolt main as the replacement, yeah whatever, I have my doubts because that just doesnt make sense from a GM logistical repair standpoint. But My friend has a 96 Z28 she bought new, it flooded a year later and GM replaced her engine with a 4-bolt main LT1. She threw a valve into a piston, tore the engine down and to her surprise it was a 4-bolt vs 2-bolt.
I DO realize it adds NO more power, but obviously it's a little more durable and with my plans for a 396 stroker I was excited (although it's my understanding the SPLAYED 4-bolt mains are actually a little stronger than stock 4-bolt main castings).
Still I'm just curious as to any of this rumor being factual and would the Block ID tell me for sure what engine is in this car in that level of detail (4bolt main vs 2)???
When I bought my 97 Z28 I had the dealer do a Carfax (all was fine) and also a dealer sheet of work ever done to the car. Two months after this car was purchased by the original owner the engine was replaced with a brand new engine (no details on why, etc). Well I don't like rumors but was told when GM did warranty replacements they would often use the LT1 4-bolt main as the replacement, yeah whatever, I have my doubts because that just doesnt make sense from a GM logistical repair standpoint. But My friend has a 96 Z28 she bought new, it flooded a year later and GM replaced her engine with a 4-bolt main LT1. She threw a valve into a piston, tore the engine down and to her surprise it was a 4-bolt vs 2-bolt.
I DO realize it adds NO more power, but obviously it's a little more durable and with my plans for a 396 stroker I was excited (although it's my understanding the SPLAYED 4-bolt mains are actually a little stronger than stock 4-bolt main castings).
Still I'm just curious as to any of this rumor being factual and would the Block ID tell me for sure what engine is in this car in that level of detail (4bolt main vs 2)???
Last edited by Brettinator; 09-18-2003 at 01:56 PM.
#3
I doubt that GM cared whether they replaced the 2-bolt with a 4-bolt. Once production ceased on the Lt1, whatever inventory was left would be dumped, i.e, sent to dealerships for replacements, etc.
When my 97 bit the dust, I found a dealership that just happened to have one shortblock left in their warehouse, and it happended to be a 4-bolt.JMHO
When my 97 bit the dust, I found a dealership that just happened to have one shortblock left in their warehouse, and it happended to be a 4-bolt.JMHO
#5
The generally accepted word on this was that all replacement shortblocks, iow all those that weren't put in a car, were 4-bolt blocks. Every replacement I have seen has has the 4-bolt mains. This must be related to some aspect of GM's system for engine production, but I have idea how that's organized.
Rich Krause
Rich Krause
#6
Originally posted by rskrause
The generally accepted word on this was that all replacement shortblocks, iow all those that weren't put in a car, were 4-bolt blocks. Every replacement I have seen has has the 4-bolt mains. This must be related to some aspect of GM's system for engine production, but I have idea how that's organized.
Rich Krause
The generally accepted word on this was that all replacement shortblocks, iow all those that weren't put in a car, were 4-bolt blocks. Every replacement I have seen has has the 4-bolt mains. This must be related to some aspect of GM's system for engine production, but I have idea how that's organized.
Rich Krause
#7
You can't assume that the splayed conversion will be any stronger than the stock straight 4-bolt orientation. Nor can you even say that it will be as strong as the stock orientation. The block was designed to accept straight 4-bolt mains. That's where they put the "meat"... not necessarily off to the sides. When you drill into an area that is already "weak", you may do more damage than you will ever recover in other benefits.
#8
Originally posted by Injuneer
You can't assume that the splayed conversion will be any stronger than the stock straight 4-bolt orientation. Nor can you even say that it will be as strong as the stock orientation. The block was designed to accept straight 4-bolt mains. That's where they put the "meat"... not necessarily off to the sides. When you drill into an area that is already "weak", you may do more damage than you will ever recover in other benefits.
You can't assume that the splayed conversion will be any stronger than the stock straight 4-bolt orientation. Nor can you even say that it will be as strong as the stock orientation. The block was designed to accept straight 4-bolt mains. That's where they put the "meat"... not necessarily off to the sides. When you drill into an area that is already "weak", you may do more damage than you will ever recover in other benefits.
#9
Originally posted by rskrause
The generally accepted word on this was that all replacement shortblocks, iow all those that weren't put in a car, were 4-bolt blocks. Every replacement I have seen has has the 4-bolt mains. This must be related to some aspect of GM's system for engine production, but I have idea how that's organized.
Rich Krause
The generally accepted word on this was that all replacement shortblocks, iow all those that weren't put in a car, were 4-bolt blocks. Every replacement I have seen has has the 4-bolt mains. This must be related to some aspect of GM's system for engine production, but I have idea how that's organized.
Rich Krause
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
02-09-2016 09:21 PM