Lioyd Elliot or Advanced Induction heads?
Originally posted by magius231
Unfortunately I don't think so...most people are still talking 400-415HP with AI heads, so 45 HP less than that would be 355-370HP, which is pretty close to what people are getting with just a cam...so are you telling me that Lloyds heads are so crappy your only getting 10-20hp out of them?
Unfortunately I don't think so...most people are still talking 400-415HP with AI heads, so 45 HP less than that would be 355-370HP, which is pretty close to what people are getting with just a cam...so are you telling me that Lloyds heads are so crappy your only getting 10-20hp out of them?
Originally posted by GreenbeanZ28
Well hows this.....I dyno'd yesterday and made 423.8 and 375.7 and it still has problems. So, Yea I think I'm right when I say 40-45 less.
Well hows this.....I dyno'd yesterday and made 423.8 and 375.7 and it still has problems. So, Yea I think I'm right when I say 40-45 less.
I think theres a misconception that HP is king...when in reality torque is king......though dyno's seem to be the hot selling point with heads these days and the flow bench bonanza on whos getting the best numbers..I'll throw a lil bone out for everybody to think about....
4 years ago I ran 10.95@124 mph n/a in a 3574lb car with a head that only flowed 255 on the intake 198 on the ex. and they quit at .550 ...... so the number games is cool but it comes down to combination....Its not just the heads..its not just the cam..its not the boltons ..Its all the above.. Its a combination..As I said before all things being the same and nothing more than swapping heads around from different head porters.Either one makes more torque or two it makes more hp ..depending on the porting style...but on the track I doubt it would be much difference if any at all.. I think both mentioned here port heads well...And theres no need to put one above the other...since thats what seems to be happening here... Neither one ported my personal heads so basically I'm just posting from the outside looking in as it were..
4 years ago I ran 10.95@124 mph n/a in a 3574lb car with a head that only flowed 255 on the intake 198 on the ex. and they quit at .550 ...... so the number games is cool but it comes down to combination....Its not just the heads..its not just the cam..its not the boltons ..Its all the above.. Its a combination..As I said before all things being the same and nothing more than swapping heads around from different head porters.Either one makes more torque or two it makes more hp ..depending on the porting style...but on the track I doubt it would be much difference if any at all.. I think both mentioned here port heads well...And theres no need to put one above the other...since thats what seems to be happening here... Neither one ported my personal heads so basically I'm just posting from the outside looking in as it were..
Originally posted by GreenbeanZ28
Well hows this.....I dyno'd yesterday and made 423.8 and 375.7 and it still has problems. So, Yea I think I'm right when I say 40-45 less.
Well hows this.....I dyno'd yesterday and made 423.8 and 375.7 and it still has problems. So, Yea I think I'm right when I say 40-45 less.
How come your 6 speed is only trapping 2 more mph than the auto guy with the 40-45 more hp you claim to have? Hmmmm smell that?
Originally posted by 96Z28Guy
How come your 6 speed is only trapping 2 more mph than the auto guy with the 40-45 more hp you claim to have? Hmmmm smell that?
How come your 6 speed is only trapping 2 more mph than the auto guy with the 40-45 more hp you claim to have? Hmmmm smell that?
By the way, whats your car trapping? Hmmm?
Originally posted by GreenbeanZ28
Well, whenever I get my dyno sheet up, you'll see that between the area's of 6300-6800, the car isnt making power. I've got a problem there that is being a biatch to fix. That is the same RPM I was trappin in the 1/4 (6400 in 4th). That is a major reason of why its "only" 119. Not to mention, that was the first time the car had EVER been down the track with the new motor. Its very easy to understand that it will trap higher than that now.
By the way, whats your car trapping? Hmmm?
Well, whenever I get my dyno sheet up, you'll see that between the area's of 6300-6800, the car isnt making power. I've got a problem there that is being a biatch to fix. That is the same RPM I was trappin in the 1/4 (6400 in 4th). That is a major reason of why its "only" 119. Not to mention, that was the first time the car had EVER been down the track with the new motor. Its very easy to understand that it will trap higher than that now.
By the way, whats your car trapping? Hmmm?
-Ryan
Last edited by 96Z28Guy; Feb 15, 2004 at 07:27 PM.
ran my car sat afternoon in the 1/8th mile.
and i got Advanced Induction heads. I was very pleased with almost 145k miles on stock bottom end it was running damn good. gotta love what it was trapping. thread here
and i got Advanced Induction heads. I was very pleased with almost 145k miles on stock bottom end it was running damn good. gotta love what it was trapping. thread here
Originally posted by RealQuick
Serene - I have a slightly less aggressive version of your cam with Lloyd's heads and stock bottom and I made 383rwhp/353rwtq. I dont think its the heads, unless they are from his first batch. How long ago were they ported.
Serene - I have a slightly less aggressive version of your cam with Lloyd's heads and stock bottom and I made 383rwhp/353rwtq. I dont think its the heads, unless they are from his first batch. How long ago were they ported.
Got the 30# injectors installed, hopefully tomorrow I can get a good datamaster run, see if its pullin anymore air in.
Originally posted by 96Z28Guy
Hey dumbass, can you not read? my sig ****ing says "383 being built" so when you ask what my car "runs" i'd say it runs about as fast as i can push it down the strip without the engine in it. If your car is running an 11.XX I'd like to see your complete list of mods.
-Ryan
Hey dumbass, can you not read? my sig ****ing says "383 being built" so when you ask what my car "runs" i'd say it runs about as fast as i can push it down the strip without the engine in it. If your car is running an 11.XX I'd like to see your complete list of mods.
-Ryan
K&N, ported MAF, trick flow elbow, MSD digital 6, stock intake-gasket matched and knocked out for 58 MM Holley TB, AI heads, Comp Pro Mag 1.6 RR's, Comp R lifters, AI cam, SRP pistons, Eagle 6 inch rods, El cheapo Scat 9000 stock stroke crank, Jet Hot longtubes, dual 3 inch exhaust with Flowmaster One Chambers and flowtech X pipe, CAM dyno tune, Racetronix 255 intank pump, VFN fiberglass hood, BMR K-member, QA1's on the front, Moser 12 bolt, Mac torque arm, BMR extreme duty rear swaybar, Metco LCA's, Lakewood Panhard rod, Centerline Telstars, 26 x 10.0 ET Drags, Driver mod............I think thats most of it.
By the way, why the 383? Not think you can get it done with a stock stroke?
I e-mailed Lloyd a bunch of times before I started my homeporting project, I was mainly trying to get advice from someone who knew what they were doing! He was always more than helpful and helped me out a whole lot. I've heard great stuff about both of them, I'd say you can't go wrong.
Also Greenbean, why are you dynoing when your car has obvious problems?
Also Greenbean, why are you dynoing when your car has obvious problems?
Look there is no way that anybody is going to get 45hp over another headporter with the same LT1 castings. Now there are way too many variables like cams, exhaust setups, transmissions and tuning that make differences on the dyno. Now take both engines and put them on an engine dyno and you will see which engines making the power. Sar2k made 452rwhp with his own ported heads, auto trans., stock bottomend, stock valves, 11.26@118.9mph and he isn't a head porter so we should all send our heads to him right? So you don't have an argument Greenbean. My car is making as much power as yours w/o dynotuning, auto trans, and a 52mm throttle body. so there is no 45hp difference anywhere. Now compare apples to apples. Later Clint
Originally posted by FastZinTennessee
Also Greenbean, why are you dynoing when your car has obvious problems?
Also Greenbean, why are you dynoing when your car has obvious problems?
I have neither heads, but I can honestly say that I've seen some people on the board with LE heads that trap 112-113 mph and 360-370ish rwhp.
I've never seen anyone with under 390 rwhp, nor under 116ish mph with AI heads.
Take it for what it's worth.
Mike
I've never seen anyone with under 390 rwhp, nor under 116ish mph with AI heads.
Take it for what it's worth.
Mike
Originally posted by Kraest
I have neither heads, but I can honestly say that I've seen some people on the board with LE heads that trap 112-113 mph and 360-370ish rwhp.
I've never seen anyone with under 390 rwhp, nor under 116ish mph with AI heads.
Take it for what it's worth.
Mike
I have neither heads, but I can honestly say that I've seen some people on the board with LE heads that trap 112-113 mph and 360-370ish rwhp.
I've never seen anyone with under 390 rwhp, nor under 116ish mph with AI heads.
Take it for what it's worth.
Mike
Nobody has posted numbers from Phil with an off the shelf cam smaller than or equal to the cc306. The one that I saw (XE230/236 112LSA) was about 25rwhp more than me and he was running a stroker and a dyno tune.
Most people with Lloyd's heads have cams like mine, or CC305, or hotcam, or XE224/230. Phil has guys running his custom cams. Of course we havent seen low numbers from him, most of his guys run the custom cams. Why is this hard for some people to understand? I pulled 383rwhp without a reprogram on the dyno. I could have squeezed out more with a dyno tune, but I am now installing a vortech S trim.
People who run small off the shelf cams are Lloyd's typical customers. He has had customers do 400rwhp+ with cc306 and bigger, but most of his customers dont run aggressive cams.


