LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Do strokers REALLY run quicker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 10:47 PM
  #46  
Camaro37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 226
From: Texorado
Originally posted by Camaro37
My stroker is nothing amazing, I'm just showing what kind of improvement it made for me.

Originally I had a 350 w/ a hotcam and couple of bolt ons, I spun a bearing and built a 383. The only thing I added to the 383 was headers, it's still had same cam, etc as the old 350. Here are the best time/mph I ran with both engines, keep in mind I rarely go to the track and have serious traction problems; so take it easy on the criticisim guys

350 w/ hotcam & bolt-ons
60': 2.19
1/8: 9.0
MPH: 77

383 w/ hotcam, headers & same bolt-ons
60': 2.15
1/8: 8.5
MPH: 87

IMO the power is more in the top end but a good bottom end isn't gonna hurt.
There are you times, you keep asking for but ignoring......no its not 1/4 but it still shows a big improvement from 350-383.

It seems to me that everyone is saying a 383 will make more power and WILL be faster assuming all other things are equal, but you won't believe anyone. You want me to find a stroker that runs faster than the 350 you mentioned? There many on the internet, I could go dig one up right now, but the main thing is running conditions, driver, and other mods that will separate the 350 times and the 383 times, that why some 350s are faster than 383s.
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 10:47 PM
  #47  
yorkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 588
From: Madison, North Carolina
You think like me..

That is why I didn't buy 1000.00 dollar crank or 800.00 dollar rods or 520.00 dollar pistons. Like alot of people do on here.
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 10:51 PM
  #48  
Hoostie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 200
From: shawnee,ks
I dont think no matter what anyone says, he is going to change his mind. He has already made up his mind that it is not better, and cant be proved. Myself, I deceided to go with a 396. I wanted the cubes and the stroker, so I did it. And I cant say I have any times, I am still assembling the moter.
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 10:55 PM
  #49  
LYSFASTZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 29
From: So. Fla. & Gainesville
I have made one pass on BFG dr's with a soft 2.0 short time, shifting at 6400 rpm's. I ran a 12.40@118, this is in a M6 that weighs 3555 on SS rims. I also have 100% stock suspension other than the fact that the car has Eibach lowering springs.

The car makes peak power at 6800 rpm's, so you tell me what you think is faster? This is on a prety tight budget build up with ported stock heads.

Oh yea one last thing, this was on a stock 3.42 rear end before the 12 bolt.
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 11:13 PM
  #50  
RicocheT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 360
From: Montpelier, VA USA
I built a 383 for a friend that has the stock top end, up to the cam. Yes this does kill some hp, but he didn't have enough money for the extras. Either way, this car went from running what.. 13.9's to probably low 13's. I can't say for sure exactly what it'll run b/c it spins the tires almost out to the 1/8th mile marker.. It ran 104mph with some improvement comming. If anyone wants to buy him a 12bolt, and some dragradials, We'll see what she can really do :-).
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 11:15 PM
  #51  
yorkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 588
From: Madison, North Carolina
Lets get back to the guys original question...

NO, strokers dont always run quicker, there are some 350's out there that will romp some 383's out there.
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 06:37 AM
  #52  
12SCNDZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,634
From: Newark, Delaware
Originally posted by Mindgame
No, consistency does.
If we're strictly talking drag racing (namely bracket racing) then ultimate power output takes a backseat to consistency. So what class are you building for? Then we'll go into specifics there.

From what I gather, you're looking to build a street car that can run good numbers on the weekend. Or is it the other way round??

For the record.... my 401 powered 66 Nova with solid roller cam, 11.8:1 compression, Dart RR heads, TPIS MiniRam, Accel DFI and other goodies would turn consistent ET's of ~10.4 @132 mph with 1.4-ish 60' times.... no power adders. I put about 5k miles a year on that car. I had a 385 cid Vega that was quite a bit faster but wasn't fuel injected and ran low 9's on the juice.... all on 10.5" tires.
So what's the question here??? Can a stroker go fast? I dunno, how fast do you want to go?
I'm expecting my current combination to go low 10's and it's N/A. That's my guesstimate based on my experience with other cars just as fast and faster. So how much power do you think you need??

-Mindgame
Was the 385 a stroked 350, or a destroked 400?

Frank
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 07:21 AM
  #53  
TedH's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 3,664
From: Brunswick, Maine 04011
I have been racing five years. My car is slow my most peoples standards but I want it to be consistent as I bracket race. I also drive it to and from the track. When the stock bottom end went I had run a best of 12.71 at 107. We put the stroker short block in and ran 11's. I already had a 12 bolt, ET Streets, 700R4, 3600 stall, CNC Heads. The only major change was the shortblock.

To me the difference was really in the sixty foot times which dropped from 1.7's to 1.5's. The increase in torque was very significant.
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 08:18 AM
  #54  
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,697
From: Petersham, MA
Originally posted by tnthub
The increase in torque was very significant.
Exactly. Torque is what motivates a car, and horsepower is merely torque over time. If you can gain a substantial amount of torque by essentially just swapping a crank, then you'd be a fool not to do it. No one is saying a 350 can't haul ***, but it's that much easier with stroker!
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 09:49 AM
  #55  
IrocManiac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,208
From: Tulsa
Originally posted by LYSFASTZ
I have made one pass on BFG dr's with a soft 2.0 short time, shifting at 6400 rpm's. I ran a 12.40@118, this is in a M6 that weighs 3555 on SS rims. I also have 100% stock suspension other than the fact that the car has Eibach lowering springs.

The car makes peak power at 6800 rpm's, so you tell me what you think is faster? This is on a prety tight budget build up with ported stock heads.

Oh yea one last thing, this was on a stock 3.42 rear end before the 12 bolt.
Peak power at 6800rpms so why'd you shift at 6400??? Just curious...

12scndz I believe the 377 is a destroked 400 but it's been a while since I looked it up...
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 10:49 AM
  #56  
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,697
From: Petersham, MA
Originally posted by IrocManiac
12scndz I believe the 377 is a destroked 400 but it's been a while since I looked it up...
Not in my case. Elected to maintain standard bore size with a 3.75" stroke crank. Felt the upcoming T-Trim Vortech would tax block integrity and wanted to have an overbore or two available in the future.
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 10:54 AM
  #57  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally posted by Josh-'97 WS6
Not in my case. Elected to maintain standard bore size with a 3.75" stroke crank. Felt the upcoming T-Trim Vortech would tax block integrity and wanted to have an overbore or two available in the future.
That's smart. I'm surprised more people don't do it. I have a spare block prepped and ready for if/when my 0.040" over combo splits a cylinder. Partially to prevent this scenario I did a partial block fill this year.

Rich Krause
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 12:18 PM
  #58  
Mr. Z28 73/97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 105
12secZ

I have a question are you simply interested in the quickest et or fastest mph? The car is a whole combination which has been stated, but let's say you stay 355ci and you stated you want to run 10's you will have to spend money on more than just your engine to get there. You will still have to spend money on the proper suspension, rearend, the correct gearing for your rpm range and vehicle weight etc. It's like the old saying goes speed costs money how fast do you want to go? And for 10's you're going to spend plenty.
The other point I want to make is that the head and cam requirements will be different for each engine, heads/cam which are correct for a 355 will both be too small for a 383/396 so that needs to be stepped up as well. But if you are building from scratch I would go with the stroker everytime as well.
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 12:22 PM
  #59  
JOE96Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 264
From: Vermilion, Ohio USA
I'm Reminded of a great Statement:

"There's no REPLACEMENT for DISPLACEMENT"

More cubes equals more power. . . Bottom line! but you have to do it right! Call Nu-Tek they seem to have it all wrapped up!
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 12:25 PM
  #60  
treyZ28's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,505
From: looking for a flow bench so Brook and I can race
Re: Lets get back to the guys original question...

Originally posted by yorkie
NO, strokers dont always run quicker, there are some 350's out there that will romp some 383's out there.
there are some 1.8L v-tecs faster than big blocks.

no one is saying its the end all determinant as to which is faster here



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 PM.