LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Bought A cam based theory any realworld exp.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2007 | 07:25 AM
  #16  
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,784
From: Jacksonville
Originally Posted by windsma
jerry magnuson developed specs for blower app. who ever the hell he is.
President of Magnuson Products. He designs superchargers for a living.
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 09:50 PM
  #17  
windsma's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 273
Im getting ready to put it all back together. someone suggested i use 1.6 rr. This pic is from compcam's website, they suggest using 1.5's. Which one is better and which kind valve springs should i use. ( how about these, COMP Cams Valve Springs
Valve Spring, Dual, 1.430 in. Outside Diameter, 344 lbs./ in. Rate, 1.150 in. Coil Bind Height,)

Last edited by windsma; Sep 30, 2007 at 09:54 PM.
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 10:28 PM
  #18  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
They are not "suggesting" 1.5:1 rockers. They are givng a spec with 1.5:1 for illustrative purposes as this is the stock SBC ratio.

Rich
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 01:27 AM
  #19  
Stl94LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,083
From: O'Fallon, MO
That's not much lift with the 1.5 rockers.
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #20  
windsma's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 273
i guess my real question is, to use this cam what else should i change if anything? Will the benefit of RR and new springs, out-weigh the cost. Stock LT1 58cc heads w/ 135k miles on them. Also this is an investment car, not my dream build.
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #21  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by windsma
Also this is an investment car, not my dream build.
sell it now then. no late model f-body is an investment.
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 03:13 PM
  #22  
windsma's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 273
Originally Posted by windsma
i guess my real question is, to use this cam what else should i change if anything? Will the benefit of RR and new springs, out-weigh the cost. Stock LT1 58cc heads w/ 135k miles on them. Also this is an investment car, not my dream build.

anyone????
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #23  
Sweetred95ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,193
From: High Ridge, MO
Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
sell it now then. no late model f-body is an investment.
Couldn't of said it better myself.
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 05:44 PM
  #24  
White96Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 242
From: Vegas
You definately want to change your valvesprings... Stock springs are barely capable of handling a stock cam. You want to go with 1.6 RR's since you're lacking a little bit of lift on that cam. Ideally you would have gone with something with a little higher LSA as well. You can use this cam and I would think it would be better than stock, but I would really think about selling this one and buying a cam that's a little better suited for the application. I would suggest going with a custom grind, there aren't a whole lot of off the shelf cams for turbo applications. You might be better off with something like a single pattern cam with a little bit higher LSA. A single pattern 224* with a 114 LSA or something similar would probably be a better match.
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 08:07 PM
  #25  
windsma's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 273
Thanks Jeremy.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rideordie
LS1 Based Engine Tech
9
Nov 5, 2019 04:52 PM
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
95chwagon
Parts For Sale
1
Feb 28, 2015 12:02 PM
BIGCOWL-IMP
Midwest
0
Nov 21, 2014 09:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.