355 build up ?
Re: 355 build up ?
Originally Posted by marshall93z
I always thought it used a round TB, like the LS1?
Originally Posted by marshall93z
Damn....1000 bux?!?! Didn't those things flow within "less than 10cfm's" ofthe CNC ported ones?
Originally Posted by me
396 cubes: H Beams, Dragonslayer Crank, Custom Pistons
Race preped block: bushed lifter bores, 4 bolt conversion etc...
TFS Heads: Stage 3 Meaux Porting, Hollow Stem Valves
Super Vic Single Plane: Ported to match heads
Hyd Roller Valvetrain: all the good stuff ;-)
Race preped block: bushed lifter bores, 4 bolt conversion etc...
TFS Heads: Stage 3 Meaux Porting, Hollow Stem Valves
Super Vic Single Plane: Ported to match heads
Hyd Roller Valvetrain: all the good stuff ;-)
Originally Posted by marshall93z
What do you expect this one to make?
My goal 650hp STD on the engine dyno, 620 SAE... Over 500rwhp and idle at 750-850rpm That should keep up with a ZO6 in a 3600lbs car...
Ii'm siked about the crate motors too.... just have to work out the details on them here soon but other projects await.
Bret
Re: 355 build up ?
Originally Posted by marshall93z
And what about a SP on a heads/cam car? I'd like to see the differences ONLY the intake made. But I'm sure the cam specs would be thrown out the window.
I'm going to send a SP to a customer with a 383 to test out so it should be good to see what a 425rwhp 383 gains with it.
Bret
Re: 355 build up ?
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Jon A was going to do that but his short block gave out.
I'm going to send a SP to a customer with a 383 to test out so it should be good to see what a 425rwhp 383 gains with it.
Bret
I'm going to send a SP to a customer with a 383 to test out so it should be good to see what a 425rwhp 383 gains with it.
Bret
Re: 355 build up ?
I'm choompin at the bit to see what it could do on my car. I guess I just need to do it..unless someone has one I can try out. I will do a back to back dyno test and share all results.
Re: 355 build up ?
lol...Yeah, I know you can only get one in there! I was just confused about the way "no" was used. Seems like it needed a comma in there or something?? I read it is "no stock oil pump is great". See what I'm saying?
"no stock oil pump that is checked over/blueprinted is great"
"no stock oil pump that is checked over/blueprinted is great"



That would have been so much fun.