LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Z28 vs SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #76  
mustang5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 40
From: Crofton, Maryland
Re: Z28 vs SS

Thanks 97bowtie!

Well said.

This is why I sold my '87 Mustang for the SS. I wanted a
different, upgraded Camaro. I too spent much less for my 2002 SS.
As a GM/Hughes employee I got the whole thing with Blackwing Lid and
dual dual exhaust for a little over $28K.

And yes, I too run consistent 2.0 0-60 times. And 109.1, 109.2, and 109.4 trap speeds at 12.90, 12.89... and 12.88 is my best at Capital in Crofton. I will post the
time slip when I figure out how to import the image.

Jim

Last edited by mustang5.0; May 20, 2005 at 12:23 PM.
Old May 20, 2005 | 12:09 PM
  #77  
96KillaZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 113
Re: Z28 vs SS

Since were talking about personal choice I Like ther way the Lt1 camaro z28 looks over the LS1 body style it looks alot more agressive. IN MY OPINNION the LS1s look like chrysler sebrings and thats why they cancled the camaros in 2002, they jacked up the design and made them look like any other car on the road and nobody bought them But I love the LS1 engine and will take that any day over an LT1..... I wonder how many people will complain about this comment?

Last edited by 96KillaZ; May 20, 2005 at 12:36 PM.
Old May 20, 2005 | 02:15 PM
  #78  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Re: Z28 vs SS

Originally Posted by 96KillaZ
Since were talking about personal choice I Like ther way the Lt1 camaro z28 looks over the LS1 body style it looks alot more agressive. IN MY OPINNION the LS1s look like chrysler sebrings and thats why they cancled the camaros in 2002, they jacked up the design and made them look like any other car on the road and nobody bought them But I love the LS1 engine and will take that any day over an LT1..... I wonder how many people will complain about this comment?
Your opinion is wrong!!!!

Disclaimer: For those that are humorously challenged, this was a totally sarcastic statement.
Old May 20, 2005 | 03:49 PM
  #79  
transam8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 936
From: Butler, PA
Re: Z28 vs SS

Ahh, the good old SS vs. Z/28 debates. This really brings back the memories of when I first joined...



-Mike
Old May 20, 2005 | 04:13 PM
  #80  
Bert02SS
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Z28 vs SS

I joined recently, and frankly this pi$$ing contest has lost its charm. Maybe the moderator WILL LOCK OUT THIS THREAD!
Old May 20, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #81  
BirchMan98z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 969
From: St. Louis, MO
Re: Z28 vs SS

Originally Posted by 97bowtie
Your reading comprehension skills are pathetic. Where did you even begin to get the idea I thought your 10 second comment was serious? I didn't make any response to it. Check the post again. I have over 400 passes at the track in my last two f-bodies. Do you have that much experience racing these cars? Highly doubtful.



I have a hard time believing that you're this dumb. Here's what you said...one more time for ya.



I know the base SS cars didn't come with lids, again read the entire thread and all my posts before you make an *** of yourself, again.



Again, you are admitting it performs better (read, handles better). This has been my point, along with the fact that the 345 hp optioned SS cars would be slightly quicker at the track. So far, we are pretty much in agreeance. Again, I NEVER said the suspension would make the SS faster in a straight line. Stop making **** up.



I agree, I have been saying the same thing, nothing more. In fact, I even agree a fully optioned SLP car will only have a slight advantage in a straight line. Here, I'll quote my original post for you:



Look familiar?



Please, show me where I blew any comment out of proportion. You're being presumptuous and classifying me as what you think of as a 'typical SS owner'. I have no commitment to SS > Z28 :lol, has nothing to do with that. I couldn't care less, I'm just correcting people who say there is NO performance advantage. You have already admitted they handle better, that is the MAIN performance advantage of the SS.



No, I 'cropped' it out of the quote because I didn't necessarily totally disagree with it. I cut consistent 2.0x 60's in my SS bone stock, so I don't think the suspension/wheels tires are much a problem if you are a good driver. However, I can see a mediocre driver having a little trouble cutting the same 60's in an SS as they would in a Z28. Yup, really trying to stroke my E-ego.



I didn't spend $4-8k more on my car. I spent about $1500-2k more than I would have on a Z28, but then again the car books for ~ $3k more than a comparable Z28. *shrug* Money isn't an issue so I don't need to justify anything about my purchase. I just enjoy the car. Again, you're being presumptuous and making **** up. Try to put your personal biases aside and read my responses with a different set of glasses.



I can't come up with any other reason why you are being so defensive, jealously is usually the cause. I would hope you aren't jealous. Now there is no difference in performance? Do you mean straight line performance or handling as well? You've already contradicted yourself a few times. Habits are tough to break.



Oh gee, no ****?



The main performance difference is the suspension/handling. Using your argument, if you took a ZO6, pulled the LS6 out and stuffed a stock LS1 in the car (and added 100 lbs or so to even up the weight), it would no longer have any performance advantage over a base Vette. It would still handle better and would still have a performance advantage over the base Vette. Stop reading into performance as ONLY straight line performance and what I'm saying might make sense.



If you need a scanned magazine article (since when are car magazines a credible source for performance numbers..?) to show that a car with bigger wheels/tires and better suspension will pull a better lap time, you are worse off than I thought. It's common sense. As far as building more cars than me.... You don't know me, but being presumptuous is your forte. Think what you will chump.



Do a search on my name. I have more experience with these cars than you think. Again, you're classifying. Your arguments and accusations have ZERO foundation.



This explains a lot. Just as a lot of people classify Supra guys as *******s, never give them a chance, and assume they are holier than thou *********. Not everyone who owns an SS is a dick or uneducated. I've been modding/racing these cars for 6 years. I simply see handling as performance and the SS has a slight advantage. It's that simple. If you'd stop judging people before you know anything about them, you might get along better.
blah blah blah, there's nothing you've said about me that I can't also throw right back at you, and to be honest, you started this whole bash fest, so before you start throwing out insults like I'm generalizing, stereotyping, and classifying people as a certain "type" take a look at your posts first.

400 passes at the track? LOL Could be done over the course of a season. Not impressed. I hang with people who've made over 10,000 in various cars.

Proof cannot be documented, unless you have 10 of each model of each year. That's why I said magazine articles because they DO test every car multiple times. Far more accurate than "I have made xxx passes at the track." Congrats, but you're totally missing the point.

Good argument there about taking a z06 and putting an LS1 in it. Not like it's two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CARS or anythig. are YOU as dumb as I think you are? this comment basically cements it. c5 vs z06. Yeah, I can really see that comparo, different engine, different body, titanium components vs. a stock c5. LOL Completely different than an SS which is a z28 with some fancy fiberglass.

you ARE one of the SS guys who has the "holier than thou" attitude. It's all here in your writing. Your attitude even comes across in text. LOL You're also talking about two different types of "tracks." You refer to drag racing as a track, but then talk about the ss's handling on the "track." Make up your mind which "track" you want to argue about. Seriously. how many of us AUTOCROSS regularly? with stock suspensions? 'Nuff said.

Here's how you're blowing my comments out of proportion, and cropping them to your advantage:

Originally Posted by 97bowtie
SS > Z28
See how much difference that makes taken out of context? LOL You're doing the same thing by ignoring my other arguments. I clearly stated the suspension/wheels are good for minus a few 10ths in the 1/4, but the lid would make back 1 or 2-- But you conveniently ignored the first part of that whole thing. This is the attitude that makes the stereotypical "SS guys" and "supra guys" hated. See enough of it and you expect the worst from everyone. But, I see that you're infallible, with your 400 passes at the track and your camaro SS. You've never categorized or stereotyped anyone. Nor have you made assumptions about people on the internet... right? Oh wait a sec. Refer to above quotes. the "handling" performance of the SS isn't some technological breakthrough either. .04g on the skidpad MIGHT equate to a tenth or two seconds margin on a road course--- if you're Michael Schumacher. But since none of us is a professional driver, the handling difference is negligible.

I was almost lured into the SS when I was buying my car. I bought my fully-loaded z28 with 900 miles at a steal. 19,500 sticker, talked the place down to 18,500. They only made $300 off the sale. on the lot that day was also an SS going for $27,500, WITH MORE MILES and less options. Still I wanted to have that "SS." I told them to hang on to both cars for a few days. Since they know me well they trusted I would be buying one of the two. I came back many times to test drive and re-test drive both cars. The SS was actually less refined on the road. The z28 took corners just as well, was a more "comfortable" ride (due to its more GTish suspension), felt more responsive and a tad quicker, had more options and had barely been driven. Both were just what I was looking for: Black, t-tops, 6-speed. Options weren't really a consideration, nor was price. When I'm shopping for toys, I don't care about price. If it makes me smile, it's worth it. The "Fun-factor" of the z28 was what swayed me. Sure, the idea that the SS was more limited was appealing, but I really couldn't justify the extra $8000 for a 'performance package' that didn't perform--this is when I decided that the "performance" part of the appearance package was non-existant. It truly is an appearance package. Having driven many SS's and z28's in the past(Both LT1 and LS1--people trust me to make their track runs and test drive cars for them due to my knack for making them go fast) I can honestly say I don't feel a positive difference between the two LS1 cars. The only true difference I can tell between the two is the SS is a lot more jittery over rough stuff because of the stiffer springs. I wouldn't give up the driveability of my z28 for an SS any day. Plus I prefer the style of the z28 better. It's smoother and more elegant looking in my opinion. perhaps if SS cars didn't have the obnoxious and pointless spoiler out back I might seriously consider one again in the future.

Last edited by BirchMan98z; May 20, 2005 at 08:04 PM.
Old May 20, 2005 | 10:53 PM
  #82  
Måximu§'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 78
From: Surrey, B.C. Canada
Re: Z28 vs SS

Man, you guys are still goin' at it?!?!? I bet all those ricers are laughin' at us
Old May 20, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #83  
CrabhartZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 623
From: Dallas/College Station
Re: Z28 vs SS

SS's have a nice hot-air-intake system.
Old May 20, 2005 | 11:33 PM
  #84  
anasazi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,604
From: Milton, FL
Re: Z28 vs SS

ahem ... MY WEENER IS BIGGER THAN YOUR WEENER!
Old May 20, 2005 | 11:41 PM
  #85  
99blackSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,719
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: Z28 vs SS

Originally Posted by CrabhartZ28
SS's have a nice hot-air-intake system.
Z28s have nice cheap wheels, with nice cheaper suspension, followed by cheaper exhaust, cheaper hood and spoiler... therefore a cheaper price.

Originally Posted by anasazi
ahem ... MY WEENER IS BIGGER THAN YOUR WEENER!
Length maybe, overall girth I doubt.

I don't mind when people say they run even times, because they do, but when people talk down about the SS then it's gone a little too far. There's more to performance then speed.

Last edited by 99blackSS; May 20, 2005 at 11:48 PM.
Old May 20, 2005 | 11:50 PM
  #86  
97bowtie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
Re: Z28 vs SS

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
blah blah blah, there's nothing you've said about me that I can't also throw right back at you, and to be honest, you started this whole bash fest, so before you start throwing out insults like I'm generalizing, stereotyping, and classifying people as a certain "type" take a look at your posts first.
Yup, reviewed my posts and I was merely posting FACTS which triggered the 'Z28 guys' to get defensive. Read the thread again farmboy.

Your inattention to detail continues.

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
400 passes at the track? LOL Could be done over the course of a season. Not impressed. I hang with people who've made over 10,000 in various cars.
The 'ol my friend post eh. I would play that card too seeing as how you can't hold a candle to my experience racing these cars. Keep talking chump. That's all you are.

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
Proof cannot be documented, unless you have 10 of each model of each year. That's why I said magazine articles because they DO test every car multiple times. Far more accurate than "I have made xxx passes at the track." Congrats, but you're totally missing the point.
I'm not missing the point. You've already admitted they handle better...what left is there to prove?

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
Good argument there about taking a z06 and putting an LS1 in it. Not like it's two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CARS or anythig. are YOU as dumb as I think you are? this comment basically cements it. c5 vs z06. Yeah, I can really see that comparo, different engine, different body, titanium components vs. a stock c5. LOL Completely different than an SS which is a z28 with some fancy fiberglass.
Of course they are two different cars, however, put an LS1 in the car (and a base Vette T-56) and add ~ 100 lbs. of weight to the car and all you have left is the fact that the ZO6 handles better. You have the same power/weight ratio and the same gearing. The ZO6 in this case STILL PERFORMS BETTER. It's not really this complicated.

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
LOL You're also talking about two different types of "tracks." You refer to drag racing as a track, but then talk about the ss's handling on the "track." Make up your mind which "track" you want to argue about. Seriously. how many of us AUTOCROSS regularly? with stock suspensions? 'Nuff said.
OMFG you're an idiot. I made a distinction between track and roadcourse/autocross in EVERY POST I MADE. Show me where I failed to make this distinction. Please, show me. I'll be waiting for your response. Again, you're spewing BS. You have zero credibility and I'm sure everyone can see this. I'm waiting for you to show me where I failed to make the distinction between 'track' and roadcourse/autocross...

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
Here's how you're blowing my comments out of proportion, and cropping them to your advantage:
Holy ****, you're beyond retarded. You seriously need to go get an education. I didn't take any of your posts out of context. I didn't ask for an example of how I could have taken your posts out of context, I want to see a specific example where I DID take a post of yours out of context. Quote what you said, then quote what I said. C'mon you uneducated hill billy. Keep back pedaling.

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
See how much difference that makes taken out of context? LOL You're doing the same thing by ignoring my other arguments.
Taking arguments out of context and ignoring your statements are TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. You're a piece of work.

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
I clearly stated the suspension/wheels are good for minus a few 10ths in the 1/4, but the lid would make back 1 or 2-- But you conveniently ignored the first part of that whole thing.
I only ignored it because I didn't totally agree with it. Good drivers can still launch SS/WS6 cars just as well. I cut 2.0x 60's in my car bone stock at our ****ty tracks. I wouldn't do, and infact didn't do, any better in a stock Z28.

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
This is the attitude that makes the stereotypical "SS guys" and "supra guys" hated. See enough of it and you expect the worst from everyone. But, I see that you're infallible, with your 400 passes at the track and your camaro SS. You've never categorized or stereotyped anyone. Nor have you made assumptions about people on the internet... right?
I try to give everyone the benefit of the doubt, but someone like you doesn't deserve it. You are so damn defensive it's ridiculous. I can agree to disagree, but it's obvious you can't. Your opinion means nothing

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
Oh wait a sec. Refer to above quotes. the "handling" performance of the SS isn't some technological breakthrough either. .04g on the skidpad MIGHT equate to a tenth or two seconds margin on a road course--- if you're Michael Schumacher.
Or if you're the same driver on the same course... (read, not necessarily Michael Shumacher)

Do you know the scientific term control means?

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
I was almost lured into the SS when I was buying my car. I bought my fully-loaded z28 with 900 miles at a steal. 19,500 sticker, talked the place down to 18,500. They only made $300 off the sale. on the lot that day was also an SS going for $27,500, WITH MORE MILES and less options. Still I wanted to have that "SS." I told them to hang on to both cars for a few days. Since they know me well they trusted I would be buying one of the two. I came back many times to test drive and re-test drive both cars. The SS was actually less refined on the road. The z28 took corners just as well, was a more "comfortable" ride (due to its more GTish suspension), felt more responsive and a tad quicker, had more options and had barely been driven. Both were just what I was looking for: Black, t-tops, 6-speed. Options weren't really a consideration, nor was price. When I'm shopping for toys, I don't care about price. If it makes me smile, it's worth it. The "Fun-factor" of the z28 was what swayed me. Sure, the idea that the SS was more limited was appealing, but I really couldn't justify the extra $8000 for a 'performance package' that didn't perform--this is when I decided that the "performance" part of the appearance package was non-existant. It truly is an appearance package. Having driven many SS's and z28's in the past(Both LT1 and LS1--people trust me to make their track runs and test drive cars for them due to my knack for making them go fast) I can honestly say I don't feel a positive difference between the two LS1 cars. The only true difference I can tell between the two is the SS is a lot more jittery over rough stuff because of the stiffer springs. I wouldn't give up the driveability of my z28 for an SS any day. Plus I prefer the style of the z28 better. It's smoother and more elegant looking in my opinion. perhaps if SS cars didn't have the obnoxious and pointless spoiler out back I might seriously consider one again in the future.
Translation = "I couldn't afford the SS".

That is all.

Last edited by 97bowtie; May 21, 2005 at 12:08 AM.
Old May 21, 2005 | 12:22 AM
  #87  
CrabhartZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 623
From: Dallas/College Station
Re: Z28 vs SS

I knew someone would get all pissy when i said that...

I wonder if WRX/ WRX STI guys have the same arguments? probably not, because they are different cars.

Or RSX/RSX Type R
Or Beetle/Beetle turbo


The only thing different are some extremely overpriced and overrated options that get publicized a LOT. No different than most cars out there.

Case in point, i was looking at Camrys recently, one camry had a base price of 17k, but had 4 options that added almost 4k to the car.

They were
1. Window tint $1,440 (no joke)
2. Alloy wheels $1,440 (wtf?)
3. electric mirror $600
4. Spoiler $300-$700 (not sure exactly, but it was between those)

that's a $3780 difference for things that could easily be purchased at half or even a fourth of those prices.
Old May 21, 2005 | 12:26 AM
  #88  
99blackSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,719
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: Z28 vs SS

Originally Posted by CrabhartZ28
I knew someone would get all pissy when i said that...
Sorry you don't like facts.
Old May 21, 2005 | 06:59 AM
  #89  
darrens99formul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
From: Rochester, NY
Re: Z28 vs SS

Originally Posted by 97bowtie
Translation = "I couldn't afford the SS".
A little off topic but I was looking at autotrader and local dealerships this past week as I am car shopping for my wife. I noticed that Trans Ams are more expensive then SS's. And WS6's are the worst of them all. I saw a few adds for 2002 WS6's with 5-10K miles and they wanted 30K! WTF are they thinking. I know the miles were way low but still.

So can I say that anyone who bought a SS = "I couldn't afford a WS6"?

Or

Anyone who bought a LS1 F-body = "I couldn't afford a C5"

Or

Anyone who bought a C5 = "I couldn't afford a Z06"

ect, ect, ect.


Yes I know how stupid that sounds but not quite as stupid as this entire thread sounds after page 1. We need a moderator to lock this one I think or we may get several more pages of whose D**k is bigger.

Last edited by darrens99formul; May 21, 2005 at 07:04 AM.
Old May 21, 2005 | 08:18 AM
  #90  
transam8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 936
From: Butler, PA
Re: Z28 vs SS

Originally Posted by anasazi
ahem ... MY WEENER IS BIGGER THAN YOUR WEENER!




-Mike



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.