LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

How many LS1's went 12's bone stock?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 07:07 PM
  #16  
Geezer powered's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,025
From: usa
yeah I've seen or read about a couple of ls1's going 12's. One was a 98 and a 02. tested by gmhightechperformance. The other was a total freak run. 98ss drags, lid and 410's went 12.40 at 111.
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 07:35 PM
  #17  
Klypto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,418
From: New Orleans, LA
if this means anything, i just got my car 2 months ago... i call my self a decent, but NO means a good driver(track i mean), and ran 13.5 @ 104.87 all i had was a good set of tires(nitto 555r 245/50/16)

i also have a body kit, no idea how much it weighs but, it was on the car when i bought it (Xenon Body Kit, in the sig...)

so, i can say a stock LS1 with good tires, mediocre driver, hits mid 13s and the clutch is crapping out, i can see a stock one hit VERY low 13s or maybe high 12s on a great track....

r/t .074
60' 2.102
330 5.869
1/8 8.862
MPH 82.65
1000' 11.386
1/4 13.544
MPH 104.87

cory

Last edited by Klypto; Jan 13, 2004 at 07:47 PM.
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:10 PM
  #18  
QCKZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,853
From: Christiansburg, VA
OTOH, my friend had a bone stock 02 Z28 A4 with 2.73.
ran 14.0 at 101 with a 2.2 sixty foot, no wheel spin at all, made many runs times were very consistant....
but the DA was 3500feet....

jesse
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:12 PM
  #19  
Klypto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,418
From: New Orleans, LA
14.0
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:14 PM
  #20  
Gloveperson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 226
Would an SS/ WS6 be any faster bone stock than a Z28/non-WS6 F-body (comparing the same years) in the 1/4 mile. (same tranny, same tires, same track and conditions).
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:15 PM
  #21  
QCKZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,853
From: Christiansburg, VA
Originally posted by Klypto
14.0
he then put 3.73's and went 13.7 at 103
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:16 PM
  #22  
Klypto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,418
From: New Orleans, LA
aye
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:22 PM
  #23  
QCKZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,853
From: Christiansburg, VA
1. my uncle has a bone stock 02 WS6 M6 runs a consistant 14.1 at 101 with a driver limited 2.2 sixty.
2. another friend has a 00 ws6 A4 (3.73's only mod) run high 13's at 101ish...

ive seen many stock LS1 fbodys run high 13's at 101ish...
ive seen many stock LT1 fbody run high 14's at 97ish....

all these times at BRISTOL DRAGWAY elevation 1744, the DA is usually 3500 or so on race nights.

what would the times i listed be corrected to?

jesse
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:26 PM
  #24  
Klypto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,418
From: New Orleans, LA
i dont know what stock lt1s run, but.. like i said, i went 13.5 @ 104.87 2.1 60'(best) but right before that had 13.7 @103.93 (2.2 60') and i need a new clutch

a transam(LS1) not sure year, ran 13.1 @ 105.42 with nitto 275 (i have 245) and he had a new clutch not sure which, forgot... he had a 1.9 60' both of our engines are stock
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 11:05 PM
  #25  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Originally posted by QCKZ28
he then put 3.73's and went 13.7 at 103
what the hell is wrong with that LS1 ? I got a friend with an Auto , 2000 , ran a 13.3 bone stock , 2:73's ........
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 11:15 PM
  #26  
QCKZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,853
From: Christiansburg, VA
Originally posted by robb4964
what the hell is wrong with that LS1 ? I got a friend with an Auto , 2000 , ran a 13.3 bone stock , 2:73's ........
it might have something to do with the density altitude

jesse
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 11:31 PM
  #27  
z28chrizz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 311
From: Latham, NY
The time in my sig corrected was a 13.40@106.5

Then factor in that it was on a 2.18 60'... that puts my 2000 M6 real close to a 12, with a 1.9x 60' time...

They are out there...
Old Jan 14, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #28  
DANOZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 122
From: ST PAUL,MN
i'm sorry but unless you can show me a time slip i don't believe it. the quickest i've heard of from a reliable source is a 99 tested by rapid motorsports (they sell performance parts) 13.3 before they added bolt ons which now runs 11.82. maybe a newer one is a couple tenths faster, but remember. air lid is very restrictive, except for ss & ws6 the muffler is restrictive. GM doesn't want this car stock to run with the vettes from the factory. full disclosure requires you to tell if ALCOHOL was involved when you heard about your buddies quick time!
Old Jan 14, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #29  
shanezam203's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 92
From: plainfield
Originally posted by robb4964
what the hell is wrong with that LS1 ? I got a friend with an Auto , 2000 , ran a 13.3 bone stock , 2:73's ........
yeah my other friend with the 98 is an auto also and he went 13.2 with just exhaust. But it wasnt 6 speed, or an 02. (all auto ls1's come with 2:73's and manual's come with 3:73's???)
thanks, Shane
Old Jan 14, 2004 | 02:24 PM
  #30  
QCKZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,853
From: Christiansburg, VA
Originally posted by shanezam203
(all auto ls1's come with 2:73's and manual's come with 3:73's???)
the highest available gear from the factory is 3.42 and only in M6
jesse



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.