Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Cam selection, need help!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #1  
That Camaro Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 233
From: Kentucky
Cam selection, need help!

Allright, I've had a (what I think is) lifter failure and my motor needs to come apart. I've been running the stock heads and cam with a powerdyne 4.5 kit for a while now. I have a new set of lifters and I'm going to change out the cam bearings and check the stock cam for damage. Since the cam is coming out I figured I'd toss a new one in there. After talking to a good friend of mine (with a solid roller 396 of doom) he's recommended the comp cam 305. It seems to have decent drive ability and I've heard it responds to boost well. Does anyone not recommend this cam or recommend anything else? I'm not looking to make the most amount of power possible, just make the car sound better and more fun to drive.

-Pete-
Old May 31, 2007 | 06:11 AM
  #2  
30thTA0525's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 327
From: Tulsa OK
im running a 230/236 on a 112 with 10psi in a 385 and am pretty happy, ill probably change it out too a blower cam this year sometime but for what you have it would probably pretty awsome.. but if i where you since your gonna be doing so much work i woulding even waist my time without pulling it and changing the pistions wile your at it or you are waisting your time and money.. put some blower pistons in there with the 305 or 230/236 and pully down that powerdyne some and you will be very pleased and your set up will last
Old May 31, 2007 | 06:47 AM
  #3  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Why not get a cam more suited to a blower application? If you do a search, you will see a lot of cam discussion.

Rich
Old May 31, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #4  
That Camaro Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 233
From: Kentucky
Is 220/230 114 not suited to my application? I've done some reading on this and it seems like a good option for my purpose. I'd like to get an "off the shelf" cam, not a custom one. Just looking for some reccomendations/opinions, thanks in advance.

-Pete-
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 07:10 PM
  #5  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Originally Posted by 30thTA0525
im running a 230/236 on a 112 with 10psi . . . ill probably change it out too a blower cam this year
I think you're going to sorely dissappointed if you pull that cam out. In fact, let me know if you want to sling it for cheap. . . I may be interested for my turbo car.

Mike
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 02:58 AM
  #6  
That Camaro Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 233
From: Kentucky
Ok, thunder racing has two cams that are recommended for blower applications:

"Comp Cams "Extreme" LT1 Camshaft, 218 / 230, .495 / .510 114 LSA, Aggressive camshaft for street/strip blower applications. Computer tuning required."

"Comp Cams "Extreme" LT1 Camshaft, 224 / 236, .502 / .520 114 LSA, Very aggressive camshaft for street/strip blower applications. Heads, Exhaust, Stall or M6, Computer tuning required"

The car will be re-tuned for the new cam. Is it ok to run the second cam without a stall and stock heads? It's not that much more aggressive than the first one which doesn't require them. A stall will come later with a new short block, more boost, and rear. Would this be ok for now?

I've never cam'd a car before so I'm looking for some suggestions/input, thanks.

-Pete-
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 03:43 AM
  #7  
30thTA0525's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 327
From: Tulsa OK
Originally Posted by engineermike
I think you're going to sorely dissappointed if you pull that cam out. In fact, let me know if you want to sling it for cheap. . . I may be interested for my turbo car.

Mike
you think so? i was afraid i was was leaving some on the table with not going with a blower grind with less overlap.. i like the cam it drives nice pulls hard as hell and sounds good.. no dyno #s yet.. im gonna go pay Ed wright a vist and see what she will do and ill get his opinon on it as well before doing anything
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 04:41 AM
  #8  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally Posted by That Camaro Guy
Is 220/230 114 not suited to my application? I've done some reading on this and it seems like a good option for my purpose. I'd like to get an "off the shelf" cam, not a custom one. Just looking for some reccomendations/opinions, thanks in advance.

-Pete-
I was referring to the original post. What you have sounds in the ballpark.

Rich
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 08:49 AM
  #9  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Originally Posted by 30thTA0525
you think so? i was afraid i was was leaving some on the table with not going with a blower grind with less overlap..
Just what were you planning on going with? I don't think you'll gain anything from going smaller on the cam.

Mike
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #10  
30thTA0525's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 327
From: Tulsa OK
i wasnt gonna go smaller.. i was thinking somewhere around maybe 236ish/242is on maybe a 114 or 115
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 09:19 PM
  #11  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Originally Posted by 30thTA0525
i wasnt gonna go smaller.. i was thinking somewhere around maybe 236ish/242is on maybe a 114 or 115
Well. . . that cam has about 2 deg more overlap than your current cam, even on a 114.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
1
May 25, 2016 08:10 PM
RUENUF
South Atlantic
4
Mar 13, 2016 03:39 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Dec 17, 2014 11:00 AM
Black Sunshine/ 00SS
Midwest
12
Jul 29, 2002 11:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.