Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 04:12 PM
  #211  
teal98's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Guilty as charged!
I think the 3 series is simply an awesome package. And it gets a V8 this year too. So if you're saying that a RWD, V8 powered, 2 door coupe package - which BTW, has a roomier rear seat than any Camaro I've been in - somehow doesn't meet your criteria for a "good Camaro", simply because it's exterior dimensions are 4.5" shorter than the Camaro concept - well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on that one.
Though the V8-powered 3-series will weigh over 3600 pounds, in spite of having only a 4.0 liter V8, lots of aluminum parts, and a carbon fibre roof (iirc).

Even the 335i weighs north of 3600 pounds. You have to drop the turbo and switch to a partially magnesium engine (328i) with 200 TQ to get down under 3500 pounds.

What do you think the M3 would weigh at a $32000 price point?
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 04:16 PM
  #212  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by holeshot
Guy, in most cases it is best to go with your first instinct!

Seriously though, I don’t understand where you get the idea that a smaller tidier Camaro won’t sell, or worse, would actually anger Camaro enthusiasts? Is this based on fact, research data, or opinion?
Combination of both. Small sporty coupes don't sell in the numbers of larger ones. The 4th gen Camaro was still the 2nd biggest selling sporty coupe on the market when it was killed, even though it was as big as it was. Most sporty coupes on the market today don't sell anywhere near the numbers a 5th gen is expected to sell. Best selling convertible (Sebring) is no small car. Based on Ford's market research, it's easy to get the idea that if Mustang was the size of an Eclipse, it's enthusiasts would have stormed Ford HQ and ripped the place apart.

Closer to home, imagine what would happen here if the next Camaro had, say, a 320 horse V6 as a Z28 model & a size in line with a Ford Probe...even though this meant the car didn't need all the heavy construction needed for 500 horsepower & matched or exceeded the 4th gen's performance and weighed in around 3300 pounds?
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 04:17 PM
  #213  
Chewbacca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 859
From: AR (PA born and fled)
Originally Posted by GTOJack
Everyone bit(hing about weight can go out and buy a Monster Miata or LS1 RX7 and STFU.
And that right there folks, is just about as ignorant as it gets.

Do you actually do anything with your vehicles besides list them in your message board signature? You know... actually drive them or compete with them? If so, then weight matters.

Would you like your truck to weigh as little as your Trans Am? I'd think not. That trailer would push the featherweight truck around quite a bit.

Would you want your Grand Prix to weigh as much as the trucks? I'm sure you most certainly would not.

Weight is a factor to consider for customers just as price or horsepower. It's up to the individual customer to determine what is best for them.

You can STFU while you ponder all that.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 04:21 PM
  #214  
teal98's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
I bet the LSx weighs about the same as BMW's inline 6. As most of us know, the CID of an engine is a poor indicator of weight (example: 4.6L Modular vs 7.0L LS7).
I doubt it. But there are three different BMW I6s that you can buy today. The 3.2l in the old M3 (and current Z4-M, or whatever it's called) has an iron block, and may very well be heavier than an LS2. The aluminum/magnesium NA unit in the 328i has got to be lighter. If you include the turbo, then maybe the aluminum unit in the 335i is a little heavier. I know that BMW said it was something like 70 pounds lighter than their big V8, but that's got to be Ford Mod or heavier in weight....

Anyone know how much weight DOD adds?
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 04:25 PM
  #215  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville
Or might it possibly be that GM built a Camaro that would sell to a hundred thousand+ at a competitive price rather than for a relatively small group and what they are willing to give up for what they want.
OR maybe GM will cut corners and build a fat, heavy Camaro, building it cheaper to increase their profit margin, then charging a heavy premium due to the retro style like another manufacturer did with theirs.
That and anyone who actually pays attention to the history of the Camaro will know that, with the possible exception of the 4th-gen, EVERY generation Camaro has GAINED weight in the later model years of the production run. You guys aren't seeing the big picture. If the 2009 comes in at 3800lbs, later on that pig will be over 2 tons guaranteed. Others might not give a crap about that, but I do. Judging by the response in this thread, I know I'm not alone.

Last edited by onebadponcho; Jul 31, 2007 at 04:38 PM.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #216  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by guionM

A Camaro V8 costing 40 grand (unless, like the GT500, it's a limited production high powered car) is going to be a death sentence, regardless as to the weight.

I think you mean the Camaro V8 MUST come in under 26 grand in today's money.
I agree that a Camaro costing 40 grand would be very bad. However, the AVERAGE price of a new car is north of $30,000. If GM is really going to try and price a V8 Camaro at $26,000, they're going to cut corners somewhere (weight?). I'd rather pay a bit more $$$ for a lighter, better car myself.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 05:00 PM
  #217  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by GTOJack
...The new Camaro owners wont be bashing the 04-06 GTOs as heavy pigs.
Nah, the new Camaro will just be a heavier pig than the 04-06 GTOs were.

DONT WHINE, DEAL WITH IT! Hmm, where have I seen that before.
Ok, here's a new one: Don't whine about the whining, ignore it.

Originally Posted by GTOJack
GM realizes Ford got it right with the Mustang, which will sell 500,000 to 600,000 units before the new Camaro comes out in spring 09. GM wants a good looking sporty high volume 2 door V6 model, a V8 performance coupe, a convertible the next model year and a high performance model after that. Sound familar?
Yup. Sure does. Doesn't change my opinion of anything though.

It is step for step mirroring the Mustang, from the V6 right up to the Shelby GT500 coupe and convertible models.
I think that probably remains to be seen...unless you're a secret member of the winkie club that has even more insider information that nobody else can know about?

Everyone bit(hing about weight can go out and buy a Monster Miata or LS1 RX7 and STFU.
Of course. If you don't agree with my POV, you should STFU and let me keep talking.

Got it!

Originally Posted by teal98
I doubt it....The aluminum/magnesium NA unit in the 328i has got to be lighter...
I was speculating, because I don't know for sure. If you know the real weight of any of the current BMW I6s, I'd be interested to hear. GM's LSx is around 390 lbs.

...I know that BMW said it was something like 70 pounds lighter than their big V8, but that's got to be Ford Mod or heavier in weight....
I went looking for specific weights for the 4.6 3V Modular, but couldn't find it. I'll keep looking. The LSx is right around 390 lbs. I'm bettin the much larger (physically) 4.6 is more than 70lbs heavier than an aluminum LSx.

But I guess I'm speculating here, too. The point is that the LSx is a very compact, efficient, and light powerplant. GM got it soooooooooo right with this powerplant. If they could just do the same with the rest of the car....

Bob
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 05:03 PM
  #218  
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,938
Originally Posted by onebadponcho
OR maybe GM will cut corners and build a fat, heavy Camaro, building it cheaper to increase their profit margin, then charging a heavy premium due to the retro style like another manufacturer did with theirs.
Maybe

Originally Posted by onebadponcho
That and anyone who actually pays attention to the history of the Camaro will know that, with the possible exception of the 4th-gen, EVERY generation Camaro has GAINED weight in the later model years of the production run. You guys aren't seeing the big picture. If the 2009 comes in at 3800lbs, later on that pig will be over 2 tons guaranteed. Others might not give a crap about that, but I do. Judging by the response in this thread, I know I'm not alone.
A car consistently getting larger/heavier is true of just about every car out there with multiple generations; it's only when a manufacturere stops and essentially "starts over" that you'll see weight start to come off again (and then the cycle of increasing size/weight will generally start over).

Also, just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they don't "give a crap"
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 05:38 PM
  #219  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville
Also, just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they don't "give a crap"
Touche.

Obviously you care because you're posting in this thread.

I'm in agreement that a $26,000 base V8 Camaro would be hard pressed to be any kind of lightweight. It would more likely be the 3800lbs number that seems to be getting tossed around here.

Again, the average price of a new car is OVER $30,000, so I think we need to redefine the term "affordable" when it comes to a performance car like the Camaro. Again, I think a $26k base V8 Camaro will be "cheap", not "affordable", meaning GM will have to build a lesser car to come in at that "cheaper" price point. However, if they could make a 3400lb V8 Camaro for under $32k, that would be an absolute steal.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 06:51 PM
  #220  
GTOJack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 976
From: SE MI
Hey Chewy:

I regularly drag race my 99 WS6 TA and I know that every 100 pounds is worth a tenth of a second in the quarter mile. I would rather add a power adder or do heads/cam to the car instead of pulling out the air, stereo and seats. I'm not into autocrossing, so a light car isnt that important to me. If you are so obsessed with weight, get a Mallet Solstice, because the fifth gen Camaro will not be light. Those twin turbo 3 series Bimmers are only 330 hp. Get one of those, maybe its all the power you can handle. I also drive over 10,000 miles per month hauling cars interstate with my 3500 Silverado. Guess who Jason D called to haul his car when he sold his 96 SS to a guy in Florida? So stick the weight issue up your azz and STFU.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 07:01 PM
  #221  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by GTOJack
Guess who Jason D called to haul his car when he sold his 96 SS to a guy in Florida? So stick the weight issue up your azz and STFU.
Oh, okay.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 07:04 PM
  #222  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Really.....

Old Jul 31, 2007 | 07:46 PM
  #223  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by GTOJack
I regularly drag race my 99 WS6 TA and I know that every 100 pounds is worth a tenth of a second in the quarter mile. I would rather add a power adder or do heads/cam to the car instead of pulling out the air, stereo and seats.
I have done a bit of drag racing myself. We all have our prefences.

I'm not into autocrossing, so a light car isnt that important to me.
Soooooooooo.....having a light car isn't important to drag racing? Extra weight - no problem, just add more HP! Look at the GT500, stellar performance out of that 445 RWHP!

Ya.

If you are so obsessed with weight, get a Mallet Solstice, because the fifth gen Camaro will not be light.
I'm pretty sure we've determind that.

And no thanks on the Soltice. Mallet, mullet, or otherwise.

Those twin turbo 3 series Bimmers are only 330 hp. Get one of those, maybe its all the power you can handle.
LOL. Yup, as far as you know.

Say, wanna compare drag racing credentials?

I also drive over 10,000 miles per month hauling cars interstate with my 3500 Silverado. Guess who Jason D called to haul his car when he sold his 96 SS to a guy in Florida?
Golly. Can I have your autograph?

So stick the weight issue up your azz and STFU.
Once again, from your perspective, we're all welcome to state our POV, unless it differs from yours, in which case we should just STFU.

I love people like this. They make my day.

Bob
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 08:02 PM
  #224  
GTOJack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 976
From: SE MI
You are complaining about something you cant change. You might as well go and bang your head against the wall.
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #225  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
You are praising/talking about something you can't have. You might as well go jump in the lake.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.