It's Official: 2011 Ford Mustang GT has 5.0-liter V8
They also stated that as is the car is way more capable but they are taking it easy for a magazine article. I would not be suprised of the stock run was a little "easy" as well to make the the stock vs Evo parts more dramatic.
Question is why was there no mention of this in any reviews? Only comes from a company selling parts to fix wheel hop issues at this point.......
Exactly what I meant. The proper way to do it is to run the crap out of it stock to get a true picture of its capabilities. The suspension changes should have been done after the car was broken in if you ask me. There is no real clear baseline for their tests. Who knows if their parts are really making the diffrence?
They also stated that as is the car is way more capable but they are taking it easy for a magazine article. I would not be suprised of the stock run was a little "easy" as well to make the the stock vs Evo parts more dramatic.
They also stated that as is the car is way more capable but they are taking it easy for a magazine article. I would not be suprised of the stock run was a little "easy" as well to make the the stock vs Evo parts more dramatic.
There's no reason to "take it easy" for a magazine article. What performance magazine doesn't want to be able to report the absolute BEST times it can achieve? Certainly not 5.0 Mustang & Super Ford - which is where the info will be published.
As for the dramatics....whole nuther story there.
As for the dramatics....whole nuther story there.
There's no reason to "take it easy" for a magazine article. What performance magazine doesn't want to be able to report the absolute BEST times it can achieve? Certainly not 5.0 Mustang & Super Ford - which is where the info will be published.
As for the dramatics....whole nuther story there.
As for the dramatics....whole nuther story there.
http://forums.themustangsource.com/s...482618&page=16
Evolution Performance: "If we just went all out, the car would be a lot faster, and I mean a lot faster but when your're doing on going tests for a Magazine you have to go at a certain pace!
There are a lot of things that need to be figured out on this car and I'm not talking about the Chassis setup, that's the easy part and I will leave it at that..... for now...!
"
I dont get it either......
There's no reason to "take it easy" for a magazine article. What performance magazine doesn't want to be able to report the absolute BEST times it can achieve? Certainly not 5.0 Mustang & Super Ford - which is where the info will be published.
As for the dramatics....whole nuther story there.
As for the dramatics....whole nuther story there.
I think they were saying they would already be modding the hell out of the car but the pacing is a little slower so they can test the mods more on a one at a time basis.
To be fair to Evolution Performance though when they said they were taking it easy for the Magazine I think they meant with the pacing of modding the car.
I think they were saying they would already be modding the hell out of the car but the pacing is a little slower so they can test the mods more on a one at a time basis.
I think they were saying they would already be modding the hell out of the car but the pacing is a little slower so they can test the mods more on a one at a time basis.
Ok now they are saying they are changing the exhaust and tuning the car.
Our 2011 Mustang GT 5.0L 4V (5.0 Mustang and Super Fords Magazine Project Car) is getting strapped to the dyno as we speak..... How much power will it gain from the Off-Road X-Pipe, Catback Exhaust and a few minor tweaks to the Tune? Anyone that guesses the closest on the Rear Wheel Horsepower will receive a Free Evol...
The only F'd up feature to the rear suspension (soft bushings aside) is where the upper control arm mounts to the body, its like a 16mm hole with a 14mm bolt (some something like that).
Sounds to me like some advertising dollars at work.
Edit: There has been a reinforced UCA mounting plate for some time, but IMO lke the torque box braces "added insurance" rather than solving a real problem.
Last edited by bossco; May 1, 2010 at 01:55 PM.
You know...there were those on the internet that said the 5.0 was going to be pretty much maxed out from the factory. While one test of one setup does NOT make for a solid conclusion one way or the other, it sure seems that perhaps it isn't quite so maxed out as some thought....errr....wished it would be.

Note that power is STILL CLIMBING at this end of this particular run. Set the rev limiter to 7500, pull the gears hard, and things are going to get interesting.
Need more data and many more examples to make firm conclusions, but very intruiging...

Note that power is STILL CLIMBING at this end of this particular run. Set the rev limiter to 7500, pull the gears hard, and things are going to get interesting.
Need more data and many more examples to make firm conclusions, but very intruiging...
You know...there were those on the internet that said the 5.0 was going to be pretty much maxed out from the factory. While one test of one setup does NOT make for a solid conclusion one way or the other, it sure seems that perhaps it isn't quite so maxed out as some thought....errr....wished it would be.
If you don't worry about those two, I'm sure there's a lot more power to be had.
What's with the "thought....errr....wished"? I really haven't seen posts on this thread wishing that the Mustang falls on its face. It just looked like Ford did a lot of work in the factory that the aftermarket usually does. I consider that a good thing, BTW. Why not add headers at the factory?


