Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

It's Official: 2011 Ford Mustang GT has 5.0-liter V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 10:20 AM
  #721  
LeadSled1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 182
From: Earleville, MD
I'm trying to figure out how the Mustang is so much faster from 70mph to 80mph? It made up 4/10ths of a second right there (1.2 seconds versus 1.6 seconds). Between that and the 3/10ths off the launch (1.7 seconds versus 2.0 seconds) it was 7/10ths faster in those two sections. The Camaro pulled back 3/10ths of that back in other areas, to stay within 4/10ths of the Mustang by the end of the 1/4 mile.

Is there a shift for the Camaro in the 70-80mph range?
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 10:29 AM
  #722  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
Originally Posted by LeadSled1
I'm trying to figure out how the Mustang is so much faster from 70mph to 80mph? It made up 4/10ths of a second right there (1.2 seconds versus 1.6 seconds). Between that and the 3/10ths off the launch (1.7 seconds versus 2.0 seconds) it was 7/10ths faster in those two sections. The Camaro pulled back 3/10ths of that back in other areas, to stay within 4/10ths of the Mustang by the end of the 1/4 mile.

Is there a shift for the Camaro in the 70-80mph range?
if someone doesnt answer this in the next few minutes ill do the math.
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 10:36 AM
  #723  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
Originally Posted by LeadSled1
I'm trying to figure out how the Mustang is so much faster from 70mph to 80mph? It made up 4/10ths of a second right there (1.2 seconds versus 1.6 seconds). Between that and the 3/10ths off the launch (1.7 seconds versus 2.0 seconds) it was 7/10ths faster in those two sections. The Camaro pulled back 3/10ths of that back in other areas, to stay within 4/10ths of the Mustang by the end of the 1/4 mile.

Is there a shift for the Camaro in the 70-80mph range?
ok i did the whole calculator thing. 75mph should net the SS close to 6300rpm and 80mph is closer to 6700rpm. so yes there is a shift there. If they wanted to go strictly 0-80 it would probably be quicker to just leave it in 2nd and go to 6700rpm. but nobody really drives like that.
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 12:34 PM
  #724  
soul strife's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 824
From: North of Cincy
Originally Posted by MauriSSio
and all those are HIGHLY campareable (New Mustang) to an LS1 F-Body
Are you sure they are not "comparable"?

Last edited by soul strife; Apr 6, 2010 at 01:10 PM.
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 12:55 PM
  #725  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
Originally Posted by soul strife
Are you sure they are not comparable?
i never said they werent. Im saying they are.
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #726  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by MauriSSio
i never said they werent. Im saying they are.
He's making fun of your terrible spelling.
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 01:28 PM
  #727  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
He's making fun of your terrible spelling.
terrible spelling for one letter? i see, well then in that case that was almost funny. keep working on those jokes, you'll nail one eventually

sorry for misspelling, english isnt my first language btw.
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 01:35 PM
  #728  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
He's making fun of your terrible spelling.
And capitalization.
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 01:57 PM
  #729  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
And capitalization.
its funny how people here are trying to divert the convo to my misplacing a letter here and there and lack of capitalization when the subject at hand is the superiority of the new mustang vs the 2010 camaro excellent diversion.
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 02:08 PM
  #730  
Tokuzumi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 602
From: Alpharetta, GA
Originally Posted by MauriSSio
its funny how people here are trying to divert the convo to my misplacing a letter here and there and lack of capitalization when the subject at hand is the superiority of the new mustang vs the 2010 camaro excellent diversion.
Hey, we are grammar *****....what can we say?
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 02:14 PM
  #731  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
well then that would make me a grammar jew
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #732  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
Originally Posted by MauriSSio
its funny how people here are trying to divert the convo to my misplacing a letter here and there and lack of capitalization when the subject at hand is the superiority of the new mustang vs the 2010 camaro excellent diversion.
You sure are a defensive fella.
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #733  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by MauriSSio
terrible spelling for one letter?
Two.
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 02:21 PM
  #734  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Originally Posted by MauriSSio
It's funny how people here are trying to divert the conversation to my misplacing a letter here and there and lack of capitalization; when the subject at hand is the superiority of the new Mustang vs the 2010 Camaro Excellent diversion.
I try to keep it light on the board when I sense things are getting a little teste [I know it is misspelled]. I think sometimes people just need to take a little break from time to time instead of arguing the same point over and over.

Old Apr 6, 2010 | 02:36 PM
  #735  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
well, back to the subject at hand. Im sure the engineers designed the chassis to perform greatly or at least adequately given the restraint of the tiny (and thus more affordable and probably quieter) 255 width tires. but i strongly believe that the car will perform even better in every aspect (hence, even quicker times) with wider tires.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.