Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GTO a failure?

Old Jul 12, 2004 | 08:56 PM
  #106  
GN1270's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 361
From: Connecticut
GTO isn't selling = sales failure. At this pace it will take them 4 years to sell the 04's and we are in the summer months. Oh, and saying the GTO is a GREAT car is stretching it a bit.
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 09:18 PM
  #107  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
GTO isn't selling = sales failure. At this pace it will take them 4 years to sell the 04's and we are in the summer months. Oh, and saying the GTO is a GREAT car is stretching it a bit.
It's very dangerous to assume that the current monthly sales rate will continue at a new price. Demand for muscle cars is a major function of price. They will sell a lot quicker at a better price IMO. And yes as a matter of fact I do consider this a great car. YMMV. It's a stretch to say however that it's not selling. It's not selling at a pace that satisfies the Monday AM quarterbacks here, who thankfully are not captains of the industry ( ) -- but it is selling and from what I've seen it's putting a grin on the face of every buyer so far. If anyone has quotes from a dissatisfied 04 GTO owner... post 'em... I'm all ears
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #108  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Originally posted by BigDarknFast
It's very dangerous to assume that the current monthly sales rate will continue at a new price. Demand for muscle cars is a major function of price. They will sell a lot quicker at a better price IMO. And yes as a matter of fact I do consider this a great car. YMMV. It's a stretch to say however that it's not selling. It's not selling at a pace that satisfies the Monday AM quarterbacks here, who thankfully are not captains of the industry ( ) -- but it is selling and from what I've seen it's putting a grin on the face of every buyer so far. If anyone has quotes from a dissatisfied 04 GTO owner... post 'em... I'm all ears
agreed. I have yet to find a unhappy GTO owner. I know 2 personaly, and they love there car.
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 10:29 PM
  #109  
Pasky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,362
Originally posted by Big Als Z
I think the GTO is the best bang for the buck out there.
Give me another car that has the power of the GTO, quality of the GTO and handling of the GTO for about the price of the GTO? And thats now, wait till next year. If I had 35k to spend, I would be getting a GTO in a heart beat.
Personally, i'd rather slap down $2k for a decent thirdgen and $4k for an engine tranny to throw in and outrun the GTO. I like the power, but the body is just Bleh, too conservative and ricey.
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 10:33 PM
  #110  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Originally posted by Pasky
Personally, i'd rather slap down $2k for a decent thirdgen and $4k for an engine tranny to throw in and outrun the GTO. I like the power, but the body is just Bleh, too conservative and ricey.
didnt know you could buy a third gen brand new? I agree with you on the looks and power...but Im talking about new cars vs new cars. IMO, I like the GTO's stance.
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 11:00 PM
  #111  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
Question WTF?

Originally posted by Pasky
I like the power, but the body is just Bleh, too conservative and ricey.



Old Jul 12, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #112  
blackpontiac2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 20
Originally posted by Pasky
I like the power, but the body is just Bleh, too conservative and ricey.
conservative and ricey, aren't those opposites?
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #113  
Ramune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 288
From: Minnesota
Here's an article from Forbes that pretty much sums up both sides of the argument, but he feels the negatives outweigh the positives.

Forbes on GTO.
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 11:32 AM
  #114  
GN1270's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 361
From: Connecticut
It's very dangerous to assume that the current monthly sales rate will continue at a new price.
So they are going to have to heavily discount the car to sell it now. Kinda supports the sales failure I was talking about.

Demand for muscle cars is a major function of price.
Gee, and I always thought muscle cars sold best in spring and summer.

They will sell a lot quicker at a better price IMO
Again, Look at my first reponse to quote #1

And yes as a matter of fact I do consider this a great car.
Well not enough people do to sell 18k units. OBTW, what color is yours?

It's a stretch to say however that it's not selling. It's not selling at a pace that satisfies the Monday AM quarterbacks here, who thankfully are not captains of the industry ( ) -- but it is selling
Its not selling enough to satisfy anybody but GM's competitors. I'm sure GM is VERY concerned about the way it is selling, and yes, GM is a "captain of the industry"

from what I've seen it's putting a grin on the face of every buyer so far. If anyone has quotes from a dissatisfied 04 GTO owner... post 'em... I'm all ears
Of course you won't find one. They liked the car and bought it. Its the other 6 billion plus people that DON'T like it enough to spend $33k on it that makes it a sales failure.
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #115  
Tackleberry's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 153
[QUOTE]Originally posted by GN1270
[B]So they are going to have to heavily discount the car to sell it now. Kinda supports the sales failure I was talking about.



by your thinking, most of gm's vehicles are sales failures then because most of them have discounts.
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #116  
GN1270's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 361
From: Connecticut
No, GM sells tens of thousands of most of those cars and GM is striving for market share right now. This is GM's ONLY sports car under $44k, and its the return of the GTO and it still can't sell. Why can't you people admit that it is flopping? How many units less would they have to sell before you consider it a sales failure?
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 12:07 PM
  #117  
GOATCRAZY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 124
From: Milwaukee, WI
I really hate to beat a dead horse here, but I really beleive that it all boils down to the same issues that were brought up with the design when the first concept pictures were issued out:

IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE A GTO!

It doesn't look like a classic model, and it doesn't look like a modern interpretation, or evoloution of a GTO..It looks like a re-badged, re-front & rear facia'd MONARO. This is the very issue the GTO "purists" had with the vehicle since day one, and I believe the general public is of the same opinion.

Yes, it doesn't help that dealers are gouging the heck out of the pricetag, but I'm sure that diddn't slow the sales of Regal GN's, or Typhoons, or Syclones back in the day (although admitted the sales volumes are different).

And to be honest, it's really a shame, because other than styling I think it's a great car. I had the opportunity to sit in one at a local dealership, and the quality of interior materials, fit & finish, and interior styling is excellent! Right on par with BMW IMO..
The performance is certainly there with the LS-1 powertrain and IRS setup...

But, just like the musclecar era of the sixties, styling is one of the key factors to the appeal of the vehicle, and it just isn't there with this car....

Again, I re-iterate that at the POCI [pontiac-oakland club international] event I attended, the Bonneville-GTO-Grand Prix vehicle line manager stated "This is NOT the best GTO yet". Which tells me that, in some sense, they knew they were not putting out the best product that they could have first go-round.

And it shows...

Old Jul 13, 2004 | 12:36 PM
  #118  
Tackleberry's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 153
Originally posted by GN1270
No, GM sells tens of thousands of most of those cars and GM is striving for market share right now. This is GM's ONLY sports car under $44k, and its the return of the GTO and it still can't sell. Why can't you people admit that it is flopping? How many units less would they have to sell before you consider it a sales failure?
I'll admit that it has failed so far. I was just pointing out that discounts don't mean its a failure. Yes, bland looks are part of it. But i like the looks, I simply cannot afford one, and I think that is the true problem...its price. I feel that GM misjudged this one and if the pricing were in the upper 20's, it would probably do better. Not that they would sell like hotcakes, but at least much better than they currently are doing. That is all my opinion though.
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 12:56 PM
  #119  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Originally posted by GOATCRAZY
I really hate to beat a dead horse here, but I really beleive that it all boils down to the same issues that were brought up with the design when the first concept pictures were issued out:

IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE A GTO!

can you explain what a GTO looks like? Wait..I got it...a Tempest with a hood scoop. Cause guess what? Thats what it was. This has been discussed over and over. The GTO we think of now of this mystical muscle car really is just a simple compact car with a hood scoop and an powerful engine.


It doesn't look like a classic model, and it doesn't look like a modern interpretation, or evoloution of a GTO..It looks like a re-badged, re-front & rear facia'd MONARO. This is the very issue the GTO "purists" had with the vehicle since day one, and I believe the general public is of the same opinion.
It was never ment to look like a GTO. And tell me, if the Fbodies stopped production in 69, and then in 99 they brought it back to what it looked like in 99....would you see the evolution? Hard to talk about evolution of a car that died. You can see the evolution of the rest of Pontiac cant we? And whats the largest complaint of the GTO is that it looks like another Pontiac, which I have yet to find a problem with as it always looked like another Pontiac.

it doesn't help that dealers are gouging the heck out of the pricetag, but I'm sure that diddn't slow the sales of Regal GN's, or Typhoons, or Syclones back in the day (although admitted the sales volumes are different).
2 totaly different stories. the GN, And Sy/Ty's were just performance models of a mass-produced sedan or truck. And if I recall, the Sy/Ty's sales were kind of on the down side.

And to be honest, it's really a shame, because other than styling I think it's a great car. I had the opportunity to sit in one at a local dealership, and the quality of interior materials, fit & finish, and interior styling is excellent! Right on par with BMW IMO..
The performance is certainly there with the LS-1 powertrain and IRS setup...
Exactly, why not take the car for what its worth? It is a nice car and it is very powerful. Its styling is not a problem as it is a very nice looking car. Your problem, as with everyone else, is the badge.

But, just like the musclecar era of the sixties, styling is one of the key factors to the appeal of the vehicle, and it just isn't there with this car....
well, let me check.....yep, its 2004. Things change.

Again, I re-iterate that at the POCI [pontiac-oakland club international] event I attended, the Bonneville-GTO-Grand Prix vehicle line manager stated "This is NOT the best GTO yet". Which tells me that, in some sense, they knew they were not putting out the best product that they could have first go-round.

And it shows...

well, HPP had something different to say, and Id like to see how its not the best GTO ever made.
Fastest? Yep
Best Handling? Yep
Best breaking? yeah
This IS the best GTO ever made, yet no one cares because its not a retro mobile.

The GTO doesnt sell well not due to styling. A lot of people drive Camary's, Accords, and Taurus, and they have ZERO styling. The GTO looks 100x better then any one of thoes 3 cars.
Price is what is holding this back. No one wants to spend 32k on a Pontiac, no matter how nice the GTO is. On top of that, dealers marking it up to near 40k isnt helping the people that actualy do want the car. Styling is not a problem as the GTO is an awesome car. If the GTO was priced at 25k, they would sell because it is a great car, and for 25k, you should be locked up for stealing that car. Pontiac has yet to show that it can command upper 30's for a car like Acura or Infinity.
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 01:23 PM
  #120  
Tackleberry's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 153
Originally posted by Big Als Z
can you explain what a GTO looks like? Wait..I got it...a Tempest with a hood scoop. Cause guess what? Thats what it was. This has been discussed over and over. The GTO we think of now of this mystical muscle car really is just a simple compact car with a hood scoop and an powerful engine.


Perhaps GM should've put the LS1 in a sunfire and called it GTO.


The GTO doesnt sell well not due to styling. A lot of people drive Camary's, Accords, and Taurus, and they have ZERO styling. The GTO looks 100x better then any one of thoes 3 cars.
Price is what is holding this back. No one wants to spend 32k on a Pontiac, no matter how nice the GTO is. On top of that, dealers marking it up to near 40k isnt helping the people that actualy do want the car. Styling is not a problem as the GTO is an awesome car. If the GTO was priced at 25k, they would sell because it is a great car, and for 25k, you should be locked up for stealing that car. Pontiac has yet to show that it can command upper 30's for a car like Acura or Infinity.
Very well said about the pricing...that is exactly what I feel is the problem.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.