Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2004, 06:07 PM
  #136  
Registered User
 
guionM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 13,711
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

Originally Posted by Doug Harden
So I read into this that the Monte's Replacement will "possibly" be the Chevelle..running concurrently with the dying Monte....

So.....you're saying that the Zeta car is NOT the Camaro replacement (yes, I'm repeating what you said so more people "get it")....BUT, I hear that the name issue is not a done deal either...though hopefully it has swung in our favor.
That's the word I'm getting.

I'm also getting conflicting accounts between contacts at Holden and North American GM regarding chassis and what's going on with the coupe.

I guessing things will be sorted out this winter.



Again....sounds like a Kappa/Torana derivative to me....Pontiac/Solstice needs MAJOR help paying for the Kappa platform.
This whole Kappa-Camaro thing is a fairly recent development.

No, as of this moment I am not aware of any Camaro-Kappa development going on. However, the idea of just this very idea has hit GM's upper management.

You are correct sir I was even told it was being designed "off site"...a VERY good thing
My standard rule is 3 sources make it so. I have something like 6 so far.

'06 as an '07.....or later in '07?
The only way on the planet I can see it coming out that soon is if this Camaro "skunkworks" is alot farther along than I (and a couple of other people here) thinks & is is based on Kappa. The Deleware plant will be ready and capable by that time.

Last edited by guionM; 11-05-2004 at 06:09 PM.
guionM is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 08:19 PM
  #137  
Registered User
 
Red02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 37
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

The endless wait, year to year speculation, and rare, tantalizing teases, such as the "Ramones / Camaro ad" on the back of Newsweek a few years back has indeed been agonizing!

For my part, I bought a brand-new 2002 SS right off the showroom floor. I could hardly do more to encourage a new version of the car! I'm hoping that I didn't buy the last Camaro...
Red02SS is offline  
Old 11-06-2004, 10:48 AM
  #138  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

The more I'm learning about Kappa and the whole hydroforming process, the more beginning to swing to the other side on the Kappa-Camaro issue.

Now just build it GM.
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 11-06-2004, 06:29 PM
  #139  
Registered User
 
SFireGT98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 1,232
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

Originally Posted by IZ28
I just wanna ask something Guion. What happened to the Camaro needing to be a high volume car with alot of models/engines? It should compete with the M*stang on every level, even sales. What happened to it being volume? Why does it look like the "Chevelle" it going to be the volume car now?
I was wondering the same thing guion.....
SFireGT98 is offline  
Old 11-06-2004, 06:55 PM
  #140  
Registered User
 
number77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

is this skunkworks in detroit. cause i want something to go look for here in houston.
number77 is offline  
Old 11-09-2004, 07:04 PM
  #141  
Registered User
 
guionM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 13,711
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

Originally Posted by IZ28
I just wanna ask something Guion. What happened to the Camaro needing to be a high volume car with alot of models/engines? It should compete with the M*stang on every level, even sales. What happened to it being volume? Why does it look like the "Chevelle" it going to be the volume car now?
Sorry, missed ya last time I came through here.

Seems GM has spent alot of time since Lutz got onboard thinking up ways to create a wide rane of vehicles without the need to make tons of them to break even. This was the basis of the whole Kappa chassis. Kappa is very profitable with relatively small production numbers.

While GM North America came up with Kappa, GM Holden came up with the Zeta. This chassis, since it's modular, is much along the same lines. Various models using the same basic chassis, and components, with variations relatively cheap to engineer in.

Traditionally, Camaro would have to have volume at least approaching Mustang levels to be worthwhile, let alone profitable. GM has pretty humungous legacy payments to make to it's retired & retiring employees, so it takes them more effort to squeeze profits out of a car than say, Ford or Chrysler.

The Zeta coupes will be pretty high volume cars. There is at least 3 engines slated for them, they will be in coupe and convertable form, come in RWD and AWD, and will be sold through at least 3 GM divisions.

"IF" Camaro is being developed on a offshoot program of Zeta or Kappa, then it's probally being purpose built. That being the case, I'd expect the guys working on it to make it as simple as possible (very few options) to keep assembly costs down, or make it essentially a shortened Kappa coupe with a different body but identical in most other ways.

As for the "why", I suspect a combination of the uncertain politics surrounding the Camaro name at the time development started (the car has been under development for quite a long while) and Camaro's gatekeepers.

Word is the car significantly shorter than a Monte Carlo, and a little lower than a GTO, and a little large to be a Camaro. Plus, there is the very real possibility Camaro is a different car.

Last edited by guionM; 11-09-2004 at 07:10 PM.
guionM is offline  
Old 11-09-2004, 07:23 PM
  #142  
Registered User
 
Evil Turbo SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Houston TX (Chicago/Evanston IL)
Posts: 781
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

Will we see a Chevy Coupe at NIAS this year? Or will we see a ZETA coupe at NIAS this year? GM really needs to show something soon. It seems that DCX will have 2 rwd V8 Coupes at NIAS not including MB cars. And ford has the Mustang out alredy.
Evil Turbo SS is offline  
Old 11-09-2004, 07:38 PM
  #143  
Registered User
 
guionM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 13,711
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

Originally Posted by Evil Turbo SS
Will we see a Chevy Coupe at NIAS this year? Or will we see a ZETA coupe at NIAS this year? GM really needs to show something soon. It seems that DCX will have 2 rwd V8 Coupes at NIAS not including MB cars. And ford has the Mustang out alredy.
We'll see the new Monte Carlo.

I haven't kept up with things the way I did in previous years leading up to the auto show season. LA has numerous design studios, west coast auto industry outposts, and at least 2 companies that do concept cars for auto companies. Unfortunately, I live in Monterey now, so I'm a bit out of the loop on things that aren't related to introductions (what some people here confuse with "concept" car).

Just my hunch, I wouldn't expect a Chevrolet RWD coupe on display. Zeta coupe won't likely to be shown till GM within 12 months of production (meaning next season, not this one), and a next gen Camaro definately WON'T be on display. Chevy won't show any similar concept cars that will distract from the new Impala & Monte.

Pontiac or Buick on the other hand...
guionM is offline  
Old 11-09-2004, 10:40 PM
  #144  
Registered User
 
IZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: At car shows and cruise nights!
Posts: 3,647
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

Thanks for answering Guion. Although, I DO NOT like what I'm hearing. The car being made on a more "Camaro-like" chassis is good. Being 100% purpose built, low option, and low production, is not good at all. The Camaro shouldn't be a 4-seat Corvette. Why don't they just take away V6 Camaros while they're at it?!

Last edited by IZ28; 11-09-2004 at 10:45 PM.
IZ28 is offline  
Old 11-09-2004, 10:57 PM
  #145  
Registered User
 
number77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

Originally Posted by IZ28
Thanks for answering Guion. Although, I DO NOT like what I'm hearing. The car being made on a more "Camaro-like" chassis is good. Being 100% purpose built, low option, and low production, is not good at all. The Camaro shouldn't be a 4-seat Corvette. Why don't they just take away V6 Camaros while they're at it?!
i would rather have a low production car. and have an exclusive team working on it (red). why would you not want a 100% purpose built car? also guionm do you think this low option (i think its a good idea) ties into what Red said a while back. there was a topic about the options on the vette i do believe, and from what i got out of it he said that high options are complicated and can lead to the customers not getting what they wanted. lower production helps to solve this.
red says have faith so do it guys. he doesn't have to take you for a ride in the car for you to know how its gonna come out. he has left hints over the years and it is going to be a very exciting car. i don't want this to become another bash GM thread.

every other day we get post about people saying "i can't wait anylonger i am buying a mustang" if these people would follow up on whats said, they will know that in a few years while their still paying on their old mustang, a very fast car will be being intoduced.
number77 is offline  
Old 11-10-2004, 12:47 AM
  #146  
Registered User
 
IZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: At car shows and cruise nights!
Posts: 3,647
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

Because this is not "Camaro" and what it's intention is supposed to be. This idea is "4-seat Corvette" and nothing more. If it's not gonna compete with the M*stang, what's the real idea? They would still be handing F*rd the market just as if the car was not being produced.

Last edited by IZ28; 11-10-2004 at 03:12 AM.
IZ28 is offline  
Old 11-10-2004, 03:12 PM
  #147  
Registered User
 
SFireGT98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 1,232
Re: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?

Originally Posted by IZ28
Because this is not "Camaro" and what it's intention is supposed to be. This idea is "4-seat Corvette" and nothing more. If it's not gonna compete with the M*stang, what's the real idea? They would still be handing F*rd the market just as if the car was not being produced.
Glad someone agrees with me on this! Everyone seems to be in the mindset of "if it looks like a Camaro, handles like a Camaro, is fast and has a v8, then its a Camaro". Yes it most certainly is, but another key element to Camaro at least in my mind is the way its always been sold. In v8 AND v6 trim. Being able to choose from a different array of options.

If Camaro comes back as a low-production, v8 only, limited option coupe, is it still a Camaro even though it may look like one???

My answer would be a resounding NO!!!!
SFireGT98 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Magenta_Hearts
New Member Introduction
4
03-25-2015 10:24 AM
Z28SORR
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
03-06-2015 11:17 PM
TURBOBUICK
Midwest
0
08-14-2002 10:22 PM
carcrazyQT
Midwest
0
08-06-2002 07:19 AM
Trevor98ramair
Drag Racing Technique
1
07-31-2002 02:43 PM



Quick Reply: Dec. issue PHR - "New Camaro" may be called "Chevelle"?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.