Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2010 Mustang 5.0 Specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2008, 03:11 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
FS3800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,028
Guy i'm surprised you are going with/defending the HP/Liter arguement...

that has no bearing on a car's performance whatsoever...

Horsepower/engine exterior size, horsepower/engine weight, those are all that counts
FS3800 is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 03:26 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
93Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roch, NY
Posts: 395
Originally Posted by guionM
But that Hemi sized 4.6 IS actually lighter than an LS2..... and by association, most probably the LS3 as well.
Proof?
93Phoenix is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 04:04 PM
  #48  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
downwithmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Farmington Hills,Mi
Posts: 181
Well I guess I will be waiting for the Z. Expecially if it comes with lightweight material, 2500+ weight chop off, and have 450+ hp/tq.
downwithmustang is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 04:28 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
SSCamaro99_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ballwin, MO
Posts: 1,182
Originally Posted by 93Phoenix
Proof?

I am curious about this as well. Last number I heard was that a LS1 was in the 430 lb range.
SSCamaro99_3 is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 04:37 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
Big Als Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 4,306
Originally Posted by SSCamaro99_3
I am curious about this as well. Last number I heard was that a LS1 was in the 430 lb range.
http://www.mustangandfords.com/techa...nt_issues.html

425lbs for an all aluminum 4.6 DOHC.

Best article i could find on LS3

415lbs for crate motor

its a PDF file

http://www.gmperformanceparts.com/_r...ineQRC2008.pdf

Last edited by Big Als Z; 09-25-2008 at 04:40 PM.
Big Als Z is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 04:52 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
super83Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: City of Champions, MA, USA
Posts: 1,214
Originally Posted by guionM



and personally I have never owned anything with a Ford modular engine.
This shows because those motors are just sh*t. Forget about Mustang vs Camaro or Corvette or whatever. My friend has a 02 F-250 with a 5.4. Its a sled, it feels weak and doesn't feel like a truck motor at all(lazy low end). My 04 6.0 eats it up, gets better mileage, and doesn't shoot the spark plugs out of the heads(A very common problem with the mod motors). The same friend has a 02 E-250 van with a 5.4 in it. Another friend with a 05 GMC 2500 van has the same comparison as the trucks: better mileage, power and the spark plugs stay in the heads. Its another slow POS I know that these aren't race cars but the difference from the chevy/GMC vans is rediculous.

And I know your dying to type that 5.4 is less than 6.0 and show us how smart you are but fight the urge! I guess while my bud with the Ford is getting passed by Kia's, getting gas more often and trying to find his spark plugs on the side of the road he can at least proudly say that 5.4 is in fact less than 6.

When an LSX motor gets a supercharger it goes over 600hp which is more than 550. The LS9 I believe makes more power than the lightning ever didid
super83Z is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 04:59 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
Big Als Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 4,306
Ford has a history of overpromising and underdelivering...
This reminds me of 94 SOOOO much. Cant wait till Ford makes all these claims about how the new Mustang will dust the Camaro...CANT EFING WAIT!!
6 years...6 years I had to hear every ford fanboy wrap about how Mustang is the only game in town.
Big Als Z is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 05:00 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by guionM
It'd be nice if you're right. Although there is probably no way the current Mustang design would look right on an SN 95 body, I do prefer the size of the previous Mustang.
Me too. An SN95 sized car with the wheels pushed all the way out to the corners - let's say with a 110" wheelbase, would be hard to resist. Add a 400 hp V8 and I'd say Ford nails the ponycar formula where the 5th gen failed to.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 05:01 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
BigBlueCruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Richmond, TX
Posts: 574
I predict a 12.5@112 mph stang GT vs a 12.9@108 Camaro SS
BigBlueCruiser is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 05:27 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
cjmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Motor City
Posts: 983
the aerodynamic efficiencies in this design alone are worth some speed increases. And the interior is 10x better feeling as well as fit...this new mustang is going to be awesome
cjmatt is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 05:28 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
Bob Cosby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,252
I'd suggest that GT & SS will be very close - closer than 12.5 to 12.9. Probably both around 12.8 or so. Pure speculation, of course....as is most of the stuff in this thread (most certainly the negatives from the fan boys).
Bob Cosby is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 05:40 PM
  #57  
Registered User
 
IREngineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: neverneverland
Posts: 854
And if the GT gets a power bump, do you think the premium packages will get power bumps?
IREngineer is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 05:55 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
boomer78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 253
Originally Posted by super83Z
When an LSX motor gets a supercharger it goes over 600hp which is more than 550. The LS9 I believe makes more power than the lightning ever didid
You don't honestly think the 5.4 4v S/C is tapped out do you?
Cause that would just be crazy talk.
(I'm talking 'Ford Certified' here too, not some change a pulley BS)
That's not to say that the LS9/LSA aren't capable of some crazy numbers, because they all are.
boomer78 is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 08:29 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
bossco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SeVa
Posts: 2,977
Originally Posted by VladimirSteel
i still cant believe ford is using 5 speed trannys... if anything thats something they are behind the times on... camaro had a m6 15 years ago... I dont believe this will be the "god" motor that every mustang owner is hoping for either. Sure, we might se a honest 400hp, but i dont see mustang being as light as people are saying in the next gen, and i suspect the awful gearing that plagues mustangs will carry over into this car. I am thinking this new mustang is going to hide its horsepower as much as we have heard the camaro hides its weight, and hp is one thing that is bad when hidden... The mustang guys may be getting "serious", but its taken the svt guys to make the mustang any kind of real serious car ever since the mustang came out of the mustang 2 days...
Speaking of God motor, if the '11 GT comes in with 400hp @ 3600 lbs, the GT500 will need a big kick in the ***, I wonder if they will make the TVS blower standard? its pricey in kit form right now, but the the TVS equipped GT500s produce 605hp and 540 ft/lbs.
bossco is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 08:31 PM
  #60  
Registered User
 
super83Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: City of Champions, MA, USA
Posts: 1,214
Originally Posted by boomer78
You don't honestly think the 5.4 4v S/C is tapped out do you?
Cause that would just be crazy talk.
(I'm talking 'Ford Certified' here too, not some change a pulley BS)
That's not to say that the LS9/LSA aren't capable of some crazy numbers, because they all are.
Did I say it was tapped out? Its painfully obvious I was comparing stock numbers.
super83Z is offline  


Quick Reply: 2010 Mustang 5.0 Specs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 PM.