Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2010 Mustang 5.0 Specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 03:28 PM
  #1  
downwithmustang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 181
From: Farmington Hills,Mi
2010 Mustang 5.0 Specs

So what do you think?... Let's hope this thing weight as much as the Camaro

The word out on the street regarding the next Ford Mustang engine lineup is that the 5.0 liter is set to return very soon.

Dubbed the "Coyote", this speculated engine is a TiVCT 32v motor, producing 400 hp / 375 tq, is an aluminum block, has a 11:1 compression ratio, and the top end is capped at 7,000 RPM. Some sources say that this new powerplant will replace the current 3v 4.6 liter found in the 2005 - 2009 Mustang.

Rumblings also indicate that this motor will be crafted at Ford’s Essex Engine Plant in Windsor, Ontario. The only jagged edge on this dreamy cloud is the strong compression ratio: many Mustang fans of contemporary times love to run boost on their stock components. If the Coyote comes to fruition, we could expect to see more bottles of giggle gas at the track and less whining...from the Mustang at least.

Rumor Mill Rundown on the "Coyote"

TiVCT 32 valve

Aluminum block

400 horsepower

375 ft-lb of torque

11:1 compression ratio

7,000 redline
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 03:47 PM
  #2  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
I wonder if this motor will end up in the next gen, smaller, lighter Mustang?
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 03:49 PM
  #3  
GTOJack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 976
From: SE MI
It is about 3650lbs and Ford has stated that they are trying to trim 100lbs from it. 5.0, 6 speed wont show up until 2011 model year, unless someone (Mulally or Billy jr) decides to come out with a 2010 model midyear special edition (early calender year 2010) and stick the new drivetrain in it.
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 04:17 PM
  #4  
SSCamaro99_3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,179
From: Ballwin, MO
I am curious about the height, width, weight, length, and bore stroke dimensions of this engine.
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #5  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by SSCamaro99_3
I am curious about the height, width, weight, length, and bore stroke dimensions of this engine.
Probably gonna be another square engine, and if I had to guess look for something midway between the 4.6 and 5.4 in dimensions (but closer to the 4.6)
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 05:59 PM
  #6  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by robvas
How much will it cost?

They finally caught up to the LS2.....
Caught up? Funny I didn't hear anything about GM's kick *** 450hp 5.3 yet?
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 06:39 PM
  #7  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
Originally Posted by bossco
Caught up? Funny I didn't hear anything about GM's kick *** 450hp 5.3 yet?

HP per liter is ricer math.
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #8  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Vaporware till I see it.
Ford has promised a lot of magical powertrains, and has yet to show it.
400hp out of a 5.0 engine, 11:1 compression (byebye regular octane) aint gunna happen without some serious increase in the price of the car.
And even if this is true, the engine lacks the torque that the Camaro and Challenger will have plenty of.
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 07:40 PM
  #9  
uluz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 917
From: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
Vaporware till I see it.
And even if this is true, the engine lacks the torque that the Camaro and Challenger will have plenty of.
Exactly.
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 08:06 PM
  #10  
Gold_Rush's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,870
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
And even if this is true, the engine lacks the torque that the Camaro and Challenger will have plenty of.
I think proper gearing and it weighing less will more than make up for whatever difference. And 375lb-ft isn't exactly lacking. That's within 20lb-ft of the L99 and 25lb-ft of the Ls3.
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 08:23 PM
  #11  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Originally Posted by super83Z
HP per liter is ricer math.
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 08:29 PM
  #12  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by bossco
Caught up? Funny I didn't hear anything about GM's kick *** 450hp 5.3 yet?
This is a joke. Right?

Haven't we covered this stuff many times over? Considering the fact that the 4.6L is physically as large / larger (and no more fuel efficient, if not less efficient) than the mighty 436 hp 6.2L LS3, the HP/L argument is pretty much worthless...
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 09:13 PM
  #13  
z28 justin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 427
From: Perrysburg, OH
It would be wonderful if Ford could pull this off. The engineers have been wanting to put sweet powertrains in the GT's for a while but the damn accountants keep killing them.
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #14  
YARDofSTUF's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 456
From: USA
I'd like to see that.
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 10:48 PM
  #15  
Demon's Camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 234
From: Syracuse NY
Ask anyone who has a 99+ GT what is the best mod for these cars is and it should be a unanimous answer of GEARS!!!! With a 7k redline a steep gear will be in short order.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM.