WOW !!!! info released today..............
Y'know the few spy shots of the MCE Mustang's interior have the same basic configiuration for the registers and the way the dash rolls back toward the windshield?????
Last edited by bossco; Jul 19, 2008 at 11:50 PM.
Okay, so this Camaro is about 700lbs heavier than the First gen it's trying to emulate. Yeah, it's a beast. But think how many more safety features, luxury options etc. the new Camaro has to lug around that the old one didn't.
All I'm trying to say is if you hate that it weighs so much, nobody is holding a gun to your head saying you gotta buy it. More cars left for the rest of us.
All I'm trying to say is if you hate that it weighs so much, nobody is holding a gun to your head saying you gotta buy it. More cars left for the rest of us.
The 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 (How Stuff Works)
Specifications
Wheelbase, inches: 108.1
Weight, lbs: 3,765
Number built: 20,302
Base price: $3,185
Top Available Engine
Type: ohv V-8
Displacement, cid: 302
Fuel system: 2 x 4 bbl.
Compression ratio: 11.0:1
Horsepower @ rpm: 290 @ 5800
Torque @ rpm: 290 @ 4200
Representative Performance
0-60 mph, sec: 7.4
1/4 mile, sec @ mph: 15.12 @ 94.8
MODEL: 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 (Auto Page syndicate)
ENGINE: 5.0-liter (302 c.i.) V8
HORSEPOWER/TORQUE: 290 hp @ 5,800 rpm/290 lb-ft @ 4,200 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 5-speed manual
WHEELBASE: 108 in.
LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT: 186 x 72.5 x 51.4 in.
WEIGHT: 3,525 lbs.
STICKER PRICE: $3,233 (for base Z/28)
Just a quick search, but considering all the additional crap they have to stuff in cars these days, not really that bad of a weight gain. LOl, just noticed auto page syndicate listed it as having a 5 speed.
Specifications
Wheelbase, inches: 108.1
Weight, lbs: 3,765
Number built: 20,302
Base price: $3,185
Top Available Engine
Type: ohv V-8
Displacement, cid: 302
Fuel system: 2 x 4 bbl.
Compression ratio: 11.0:1
Horsepower @ rpm: 290 @ 5800
Torque @ rpm: 290 @ 4200
Representative Performance
0-60 mph, sec: 7.4
1/4 mile, sec @ mph: 15.12 @ 94.8
MODEL: 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 (Auto Page syndicate)
ENGINE: 5.0-liter (302 c.i.) V8
HORSEPOWER/TORQUE: 290 hp @ 5,800 rpm/290 lb-ft @ 4,200 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 5-speed manual
WHEELBASE: 108 in.
LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT: 186 x 72.5 x 51.4 in.
WEIGHT: 3,525 lbs.
STICKER PRICE: $3,233 (for base Z/28)
Just a quick search, but considering all the additional crap they have to stuff in cars these days, not really that bad of a weight gain. LOl, just noticed auto page syndicate listed it as having a 5 speed.
Something seems a little off with the numbers from that site. The '69 396 SS is listed with a weight of 3,790 lbs, a whopping 25lbs more than the Z28. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the big block added ~100-125lbs on its own, plus an SS was a higher optioned car than the Z28.
The Edmonds video says the RS Package is an appearance deal with HID's, 20" wheels and spoiler....and it can come with both the V6 car, and the SS. My guess is these pictures are of loaded up cars that will run $27-$30K irregardless of price. If you want a stripper $20K V6 car, you will have ugly headlights, no spoiler, 17"s, and decontented interior.
Me, I want a V8, no frills Camaro because nothing else will do.
Car looks stunning. The weight thing is kind of a bummer, but not a huge deal seeing some of the performance numbers listed. I think one test drive may erase the weight concern for most people.
All the articles seem to be glowing about the car, which is great. And even though Mustang does have a refresh coming up, man Edmunds is beating it up in comparisons.
I love this quote from MotorTrend:
"Is all this enough to take out the original retro musclecar and the Challenger from Dodge? Says Oppenheiser, "[Dodge] wanted to be first to the street in this pony war you guys are creating, and I think they're suffering from it." As for the Mustang, he's equally blunt. "We understand their strategy-a Mustang for every buyer. We're not taking that strategy. We've had their whole range on certain rides with us and evaluated all of them. I'm not worried." Fighting words, indeed."
Nice to see the competitive fuel burning hot on the new Camaro team
All the articles seem to be glowing about the car, which is great. And even though Mustang does have a refresh coming up, man Edmunds is beating it up in comparisons.
I love this quote from MotorTrend:
"Is all this enough to take out the original retro musclecar and the Challenger from Dodge? Says Oppenheiser, "[Dodge] wanted to be first to the street in this pony war you guys are creating, and I think they're suffering from it." As for the Mustang, he's equally blunt. "We understand their strategy-a Mustang for every buyer. We're not taking that strategy. We've had their whole range on certain rides with us and evaluated all of them. I'm not worried." Fighting words, indeed."
Nice to see the competitive fuel burning hot on the new Camaro team
Not to mention fuel economy, which (as anyone with half a brain could have seen coming) is suddenly very important again, and will remain so to the end of the petroleum age.
I can understand people are a little unhappy with the weight of the car, but just think how much GM tried to reduce the weight on the vehicle. Look, with all the standards and regulations, its those aspects that make the weight so much. Give it a chance my friends,maybe once driving a camaro may change your mind. Who knows, maybe the information is wrong and will be corrected on Monday.
As much as I also want the HUD, I believe what you have circled there is just the dash forming around the tach.




