The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Gears will get you down the track quicker for sure, if thats your only interest, but you'll still be low on power and well within reach of lightly modded LT1's and especially LS1's to easily beat ya...I personally wouldnt want a 2v unless it was blown or some kind of FI, and that only gets you so far w/ a stock engine, all the Bolt ons might get you seeing low 13's if you improve your driving. Or you could go the same route Tim did, dump enough money into it to air condition he!! to get some decent numbers( his cars a monster now, but look what he went through to get it there). Id take pop's LT1 over, throw some bolt ons,stall,gears into it and be well in the 12's, sadly probably faster then alot of post 99 blown GT's run.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by Antz97ZNJ
Gears will get you down the track quicker for sure, if thats your only interest, but you'll still be low on power and well within reach of lightly modded LT1's and especially LS1's to easily beat ya...I personally wouldnt want a 2v unless it was blown or some kind of FI, and that only gets you so far w/ a stock engine, all the Bolt ons might get you seeing low 13's if you improve your driving. Or you could go the same route Tim did, dump enough money into it to air condition he!! to get some decent numbers( his cars a monster now, but look what he went through to get it there). Id take pop's LT1 over, throw some bolt ons,stall,gears into it and be well in the 12's, sadly probably faster then alot of post 99 blown GT's run.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by Chris89Stang
at this thread!Thanks to Dumb (Steve Y) and Dumber (lovescamaros25 ) for the laughs.

**** off, a**wipe.
Last edited by Steve Y; Aug 29, 2004 at 01:38 PM.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by Steve Y
**** off, a**wipe.

There are several "bolt-on" 2Vs in the 12's. The quickest is around 12.3 or so, if memory serves. That's within a few tenths of the quickest bolt-on LT1, though nowhere near what an LS1 can do.
Originally Posted by Steve Y
Yep, I hate everybody here. You got me figured out.

He said F.. to me. I told him what people do when people say that. I never said I would knock his teeth out you idiot. I merely told him to come say it to my face.
97Bowtie and I agree on a lot and disagree on a few things. All I said was that the LT1 had more torque till 3000 rpm and was more fun to drive around town because of it. It was an opinion.
When it doesn't work that way, you resort to petty insults and flames...afraid the internet persona you've so cleverly crafted is going to "take a hit" and you'll be left looking like a fool.
You've always been a big a**hole since I got here. Nothing has changed.
I have not run the car with these mods yet. I'll post times when I do.
Just because you waste more money on your cars doesn't make you superior. It makes you a wreckless moron with money. Ever heard of investing for the future?
If my car is a POS, so are your two Mustangs, idiot. They have the same underpinnnings and same sheetmetal on one. I know, because you bent over and paid too much for your Cobra and got 130 more horses than me, you are cool, right?
Answer, the dragstrip. Ever been there?
could buy a brand new Viper with cash if I wanted to.
Did I ever say I was the best short time cutter? No. I just said for all of Bobs bs he sure doesn't slip his clutch very well. You want a brownie button for your short times? I'm not impressing you, darn. It was my goal to impress middle aged cocky jerks.
I don't need a brownie button, because I'm not the one on CamaroZ28.com talking sh*t about beating F-bodies...you are.
Believe me, nobody on this board is impressed with you. That fact is clearly evident in the responses seen in this, and many other threads.
S.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
SteveY, everything snorman and Bob are sayin is fact, Im far from knowing everything but they do speak fact. Im also surprised Bob is replyin to you, some of the topics are idiotic and way out in left field, and Ive yet to see him be an a$$hole to anyone on this board even when pushed..They've both piloted 11 second cars to my knowledge maybe even faster ones, and one of the guys is a sponcered racer. Snorman proved his driving when he raced Hoss the other night in TR. Who are we gonna believe the guy that hasnt broken 13's or these guys.These arent the 2 guys you wanna argue racing w/. This might be the pot calling the kettle black but your starting to look bad.
Last edited by Antz97ZNJ; Aug 29, 2004 at 04:44 PM.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by Steve Y
**** off, a**wipe.

One of the biggest dumbasses on the site calling me names, that really hurts.
Whats really funny is for how long you've been here you still haven't figured out that you post KILL STORIES in the KILL STORY section. You start these retarted threads that have nothing to do with this section and it makes you look like even a bigger moron.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Well bob,I hope the 4.6 modular does not have more low-end than my lt1 considering its giving up 1.1liters of displacement.I was comparing two engines with similiar displacement(lt1&ls1),and trying to figure out why a car that has ten or less years of technology,has a shorter stroke,and I believe is slightly heavier makes more low end than the phenominal ls1.Oh,so its probably in the difference of camshaft specs,intake runner length,and head volume.Well all those technology advances did not do as much for the ls1 as we thought.Maybe the ls1 intake/head combo is not as great and legendary as what some people say it is considering the lt1 heads and intake flow better between 0-3000rpms.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by lovescamaros25
Well bob,I hope the 4.6 modular does not have more low-end than my lt1 considering its giving up 1.1liters of displacement.I was comparing two engines with similiar displacement(lt1&ls1),and trying to figure out why a car that has ten or less years of technology,has a shorter stroke,and I believe is slightly heavier makes more low end than the phenominal ls1.Oh,so its probably in the difference of camshaft specs,intake runner length,and head volume.Well all those technology advances did not do as much for the ls1 as we thought.Maybe the ls1 intake/head combo is not as great and legendary as what some people say it is considering the lt1 heads and intake flow better between 0-3000rpms.
While you're at it, do some research to try and prove how the advent of the LS1 helped kill the F-body, and how GM could have possible saved they F-body, had they of just kept the LT1.
And finally, tell us about all those LS1's you whoop. You know - everything is possible on the internet. Steve Y can buy $80K Vipers with cash tomorrow on the internet - I don't see why you shouldn't slaughter 99% of the LS1s in the land?
At least from idle to 3000 rpm.
Originally Posted by lovescamaros25
Maybe the ls1 intake/head combo is not as great and legendary as what some people say it is considering the lt1 heads and intake flow better between 0-3000rpms.
"Between 0-3000rpms"...you're kidding...right?
S.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by toneloc12345
Bob already made it clear about tq helping you go fast. A duramax truck is going to have WAY more tq than an LT1 but which is faster?
TONY
TONY
Originally Posted by lovescamaros25
That is by far the stupidest thing I have ever heard in my whole entire life,and may god have mercy on your soul....That sums it up.What a moron.
S.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by lovescamaros25
That is by far the stupidest thing I have ever heard in my whole entire life,and may god have mercy on your soul.Lets see,hmmmmmm.1 the duramax is a diesel.2diesels arent fast.3whats the weight difference between a camaro z28 and a 3/4 or 1 ton duramax?That sums it up.What a moron.


