The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
And for the 50 millionth time in this post, the whole point of a message sails 50,000 ft over dumb dumb's head.


Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Hey! I found a picture of lovescamaros25's car!
Maybe you could swing by Steve Y's house and pick him up while you are on your way to find a clue.
Maybe you could swing by Steve Y's house and pick him up while you are on your way to find a clue.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Snorman and Chris89Stang you are nothing but a big pieces of................ I am putting you two on my ignore list as well. Don't expect responses from me.
Last edited by Steve Y; Aug 29, 2004 at 06:44 PM.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
lovescamaros At least i'm not dumb enough to argue about 0-3000rpm crap.
TONY Face it our cars are a lot slower than ls1's
TONY Face it our cars are a lot slower than ls1's
Last edited by toneloc12345; Aug 29, 2004 at 06:36 PM.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by toneloc12345
lovescamaros At least i'm not dumb enough to argue about 0-3000rpm crap.
TONY Face it our cars are a lot slower than ls1's
TONY Face it our cars are a lot slower than ls1's
Originally Posted by Steve Y
Snorman and Chris89Stang you are nothing but a big pieces of................ I am putting you two on my ignore list as well. Don't expect responses from me.
I'd guess you'd do well to put many more members from this board on your ignore list.
You make sure and post those timeslips when you get them, Billy Glidden, Jr..
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by Steve Y
Snorman and Chris89Stang you are nothing but a big pieces of................ I am putting you two on my ignore list as well. Don't expect responses from me.

Originally Posted by lovescamaros25
My point about the lt1 is the lt1 heads/and intake flow better the minute you turn the key to 3000 rpms.roughly.
I would venture to say you have only a very vague idea of how a 4-stroke, internal combustion engine works.
S.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by Snorman
You should have stopped after your first post making this claim. Then you could have at least claimed that you incorrectly worded this ridiculous notion. Now there's no turning back, and your idiocy is etched in stone.
I would venture to say you have only a very vague idea of how a 4-stroke, internal combustion engine works.
S.
I would venture to say you have only a very vague idea of how a 4-stroke, internal combustion engine works.
S.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Since so many of you seem to want to talk about 0-3000 rpm and now, diesel trucks, here you go, a Duramax that runs 12s and can pull your boat with ease:
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/fe...8_0402_diesel/
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/fe...8_0402_diesel/
Originally Posted by lovescamaros25
I would say that I know quite a bit about the internal combustion otto cycle engine developed by Nicholas Otto in 1876 buddy.Probably even more than you son
However, nice results from your Google search!
If you're so smart, explain why there is a difference in flow numbers at...say 2000rpm versus 5000rpm.
We're waiting, and don't come up with some bullsh*t flame...explain it.
S.
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by nuke61
Since so many of you seem to want to talk about 0-3000 rpm and now, diesel trucks, here you go, a Duramax that runs 12s and can pull your boat with ease:
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/fe...8_0402_diesel/
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/fe...8_0402_diesel/
Re: The LT1 is a torque monster compared to the weak a** 4.6.
Originally Posted by Snorman
I don't think so.
However, nice results from your Google search!
If you're so smart, explain why there is a difference in flow numbers at...say 2000rpm versus 5000rpm.
We're waiting, and don't come up with some bullsh*t flame...explain it.
S.
However, nice results from your Google search!
If you're so smart, explain why there is a difference in flow numbers at...say 2000rpm versus 5000rpm.
We're waiting, and don't come up with some bullsh*t flame...explain it.
S.


