Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 04:32 PM
  #121  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,022
From: MD
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Originally Posted by FIREBIRDMIKE
ok marck85z where do "you" think they got that number on the title? what do u think GM doesnt know the weight of everycar ever shipped down to the nearest lb? Something called DOT ever hear of them? SO again where do "you" think they got the number from?\

sitting around weighing your stock lg4 z..........dude u have to much time on your hands
1. Where do I think they got that number from? Who knows, their a$$ maybe?

2. Why don't you contact the "DOT" and ask them what your car weighs exactly? Or better yet, contact GM.

3. I weighed my stock LG4 as a baseline, much like running down the 1/4 stock also. I wanted to know what mods accomplished what first of all, and secondly I made decisions on what specs (converter, cam, carb tuning, gearing etc etc) I needed based upon weight. I tried to put together a combo that works together, and weight is an important tool.

I don't want to hear anymore of that nonsense about shipping weight or manufacturer's measurements. Truckers often underrate their shipping payload to carry more to bring up earnings per shipment. They do this in the auto shipping industry as well. Many years ago when I first started working at a Lincoln/Mercury dealer, one of my job duties was to inspect cars as they were pulled off the trucks. Nearly every driver asked for routes around the weight station on I95, as they were overloaded - hench false shipping weights. And about manufacturer's measurements. GM rated the F-body LS1 at 305 crank HP. Actual measurements show that to be false. Same goes with the TTA, GN, Sy/Tys etc. Ford claimed 320HP for the 99 Cobra... BS! Look in a 2000 Ford Lightning owners manual sometime. They claim its only good for 14.6@95mph. That is also untrue. I can go on and on, but I'll save you the embarassment. Don't believe everything you read, no matter what its printed on. Especially anything government related.

BTW - I checked my title to see how much my cars weighs. Its shown at 3100 GVW. I know that's not true because I have weighed my car. But according to you that must be correct, so my car must also be lighter than your 4th gen right?

It's obvious by now that you have no intention of weighing your cars, and that you'd rather read a piece of paper. One day you'll wake up... And I'm done with you

Last edited by Marc 85Z28; Mar 10, 2005 at 05:07 PM.
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 08:30 PM
  #122  
85_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Originally Posted by Judge-Jury-Executioner
Here's an LS1 beatdown by a 305. Notice the LS1 flyby at the end.

http://www.transamws6.com/video/race.wmv

Actually.. it looks like the LS1 just plain flat-out passed him at the end, but either way that 305 did really good :thumbsup:
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 08:48 PM
  #123  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Originally Posted by teke184
as stated....what engine is the 305? carb, tbi or tpi??

i know my 87 305 TPI with bolt ons (ram air, airfoil, pulley, gutted cats and a catback) would outrun the 4.6s at least in shorter street races. the TPI was only making 190hp stock, maybe 210 modded. but the stock torque was something like 325#s....thats almost what the 300hp LS1 makes.

up top the 4.6 would porbably out run a TPI, but in something like the 1/8th mile i doubt it. specially since the stang will have a hard time hooking with 4.10s. unless he's got DRs...which would make it unfair.
A cammed/geared 305 may run close to a 4.6 if its stock. The 78 was a heavy car though. I think, depending on the size of the cam and a few other variables would be needed to make a determination.
A stock 305VS4.6 wouldnt even be a race. The 4.6 would win fairly easy.
Some of the later 305 cars made it into the 15's..WOOHOO!
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #124  
85_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

^So what about a cammed 305 in a '85? Amongst intake and exhaust?
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 12:05 PM
  #125  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,022
From: MD
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Originally Posted by robb4964
Some of the later 305 cars made it into the 15's..WOOHOO!
305's were breaking into the 14s totally stock as early as 1983
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 03:40 PM
  #126  
85_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

^Thanx for defending the cause Robb
Which engine cars were the 14's? And were they proffesionaly driven?
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 04:00 PM
  #127  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Originally Posted by Marc 85Z28
305's were breaking into the 14s totally stock as early as 1983
Hmmm.....I don't know....1983 L69 Z28 running high 14s? I sure don't remember that being the case - not saying it isn't possible or didn't happen, but I'd like to see some evidence.
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 08:02 PM
  #128  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

And plenty of stock '96-98 GTs had a hard time getting into the 14s. That 305 has a chance.
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 12:09 PM
  #129  
87camracer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 329
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Originally Posted by 85_305
LOL.. are YOU focking dumb? Why in the FOCK would I be talking about fwhp???? I am talking rwhp.

I Burn Rice Too: Actually.. you are right. I forgot that all F-bodies get 2 bolt mains ALL the time (except the L98) and the Vette's get 4-bolt mains ALL THE TIME. I was for some reason thinking that the F-Bod LT1 was 4bolt..

OttawaZ: Thanx for your input and you have a nice weekend as well
actually you guys are both wrong. the L98 is 2 bolt main. i think even the L98 vette was 2 bolt. the lt1 vette and lt4 anything got 4 bolt mains.

they are rated at 245/345 stock at the flywheel. period. gm has NEVER rated their engines at the wheels. but some make advertised FLYWHEEL numbers at the rear wheels.

my car made 227rwhp and 357rwtq with a catback, custom sh*tty cai and a rebuitl tranny. mods were: bassani catback with open cutout, pvc CAI, rebuilt tranny with POS shift kit, vette stall, vette servo. truth be told i doubt i have any of those tranny mods because its in general a POS.
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #130  
85_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Originally Posted by 87camracer
actually you guys are both wrong. the L98 is 2 bolt main. i think even the L98 vette was 2 bolt. the lt1 vette and lt4 anything got 4 bolt mains.

they are rated at 245/345 stock at the flywheel. period. gm has NEVER rated their engines at the wheels. but some make advertised FLYWHEEL numbers at the rear wheels.

my car made 227rwhp and 357rwtq with a catback, custom sh*tty cai and a rebuitl tranny. mods were: bassani catback with open cutout, pvc CAI, rebuilt tranny with POS shift kit, vette stall, vette servo. truth be told i doubt i have any of those tranny mods because its in general a POS.
Hm.. that is weird because my friend w/ an 87 IROC said that his L98 had a 4bolt main Well, he said he THINKS it did, but he said he isn't positive. Camracer.. what year/model/engined f-body you have?
Old Mar 13, 2005 | 02:09 AM
  #131  
hallbilly's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 188
From: Las Vegas
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Originally Posted by 85_305
That is kool WHat year 4.6?

And, i looked into it more guys and you'z are right. About 200-210hp, 280-ish torque
Sorry guys
i think a 95 or a 96? 96 was first year of 4.6?
Old Mar 13, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #132  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,022
From: MD
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Hmmm.....I don't know....1983 L69 Z28 running high 14s? I sure don't remember that being the case - not saying it isn't possible or didn't happen, but I'd like to see some evidence.
Car and Driver 6/83. I have the issue around here somewhere. If I locate it I'll post a picture. Just imagine a stock 305 Camaro running high 14s stock, and smoking a 5.0 in the process
Old Mar 13, 2005 | 09:48 AM
  #133  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Please do post it and make a believer out of me.

And 3rd Gen's of that era did occasionally beat the same year 5.0s, but it was the exception vice the rule.

Bob

PS....I have a MM&FF that has a stock 305 3rd Gen running 14.4, but it wasn't an 83.
Old Mar 13, 2005 | 11:44 AM
  #134  
85_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,610
From: Holland, NY
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Originally Posted by hallbilly
i think a 95 or a 96? 96 was first year of 4.6?
They started that body style in 94 (I just looked it up, lol).

Bob Cosby, what year, engined, and trannied thirdgen did you find w/ a 14.4?
Old Mar 13, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #135  
Blu91Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 57
From: Schaumburg, IL
Re: 305 vs 4.6.. who would win?

Originally Posted by 85_305
They started that body style in 94 (I just looked it up, lol).

Bob Cosby, what year, engined, and trannied thirdgen did you find w/ a 14.4?
I'd guess a 90-92 1LE LB9 (305 TPI) 5-spd. Car Craft managed a 14.3 with a 91 L98.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.