Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

06 GT vs 97 LT1 vid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 04:49 PM
  #16  
1BadAzzGT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 77
From: Pasadena, Md, USA
Originally Posted by CANTONRACER
My wife's 06 GT 5 speed is easy mid 13's...if not a tad quicker.

That is faster than my 14.0@99 mph LT1.

Hell no ... no way in hell .... don't say stuff like that on the ole' mighty CamarHO site. All the diehard GM fans will get the panties in bunches and then require group therapy.













































































.............
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 06:00 PM
  #17  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by 1BadAzzGT
Hell no ... no way in hell .... don't say stuff like that on the ole' mighty CamarHO site. All the diehard GM fans will get the panties in bunches and then require group therapy.

.............
your shat is a terd. everyone knows it.
my statement still stands... factory/heads/cam performance wise mustangs have been a BORE for the last 20+ years...
i mean... you have a power adder and you're still slow as *****...
YAWN
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 06:05 PM
  #18  
Spinner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,945
From: Fort Benning, GA
Originally Posted by SnakeSkinner28
Your wifes fat *** mustang GT will not make below a 13.7 in the 1/4 and Ive seen plenty of BONE STOCK LT1s hit that #, the majority will not. But when we are talking about a 10th or 2 we are not talking about a "spanking". And just because you ran a 14.0 doesnt mean that someone who can drive will. And I would like to see the time slips of the Mach 1 running a 13.3 all day long. I raped one of those turds from a dead stop by about 4-5 cars. That is not a close race.

I ran one at the track, and he was 100% bone stock dealer tag factory tires/airbox. It was an 05, this was almost 2 years ago. He went 13.35@102 with a 1.97 60' to my 12.2@114
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #19  
camzaro28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,046
From: Fargo, ND
hell my car stock rana 14.7@95 best out of the first 3 trips to the track, some of them were just not maintained correctly. AAnd that was with less then 45k miles on it.
Hey Mikie, glad we are on the same page. Basically I am just reporting back what happens in the real world, no guess work involved. Like you pointed out earlier, I will post the vid win or lose. No big deal to me, someone always has a faster car!

And my camera is a SONY and I am using the nightshot. Maybe I need to clean the lense, dunno.
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 06:52 PM
  #20  
1BadAzzGT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 77
From: Pasadena, Md, USA
Originally Posted by SS RRR
your shat is a terd. everyone knows it.
my statement still stands... factory/heads/cam performance wise mustangs have been a BORE for the last 20+ years...
i mean... you have a power adder and you're still slow as *****...
YAWN

Did you run 11's yet?
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #21  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by 1BadAzzGT
Did you run 11's yet?
doesn't matter what i run. i beat you and you don't like that.
you just worry about your terd and i'll worry about mine.
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 07:33 PM
  #22  
1BadAzzGT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 77
From: Pasadena, Md, USA
Originally Posted by SS RRR
doesn't matter what i run. i beat you and you don't like that.
you just worry about your terd and i'll worry about mine.
Why would I worry about your turd? It's 2006 and you've managed to get slower as the years pass.

Ask Santa and maybe you'll run 11's...... miracles do happen.
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 08:47 PM
  #23  
SnakeSkinner28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 376
From: VA
Talking

Originally Posted by Mikie
I know Canton will speak for himself, but I see you mentioned my Mach in your segment. I have not had the car in quite a while and do not have any of the slips saved up, nor do I feel like I have to prove anything to anyone here. I eat sleep and drink LT1 motors so please do not try to tell me that we are bad drivers because we couldnt get them lower than what we said.
You need to step back and realize that maybe you did "rape" one of those turds..as you so graciously put it, but you are not stock for one. Secondly how do we know ( using your philosophy with our LT1's ) that the Mach driver didnt suck?
See, I can do this all day long.
Now please respond with some useful input to the discussion without a slew of name calling. I know its gonna be hard, but please try
Also,
These guys on this forum know me and wouldnt question my integrity as I and some of the other old timers here were founding members years before you even thought of that witty screen name you have.

Later
You eat, sleep, and drink LT1s. Allow me to retort. I eat food, sleep in a bed, and drink beer. I drive my LT1, and I go after slow *** 06 Mustang GTs, and the old Mach 1s that had a version of the slowbra motor in it that always seemed to get wasted by the LS1 SS. And of course I know they dont make the Camaro anymore, you can refer to from the factory from whatever year your talking about jackass. If I were comparing a modern Camaro which there will be in 09, there would be no performance comparison, just like it always was. Mustang had a 2.5 year marketing jump on the Camaro to establish a name for itself, and Ford did a better job of marketing the Mustang since it was all it had. Chevy had the Corvette, which they still make. Without the Mustang, Ford had NOTHING that went fast. Just like now, and I dont count the GT .01% of the population can afford one. Take any year BOTH the Camaro and Mustang were made and the Camaro pummels the Mustang. "I can do this all day" , and dont let my low post count fool you. They redid the website a while ago and lots of peoples posts were lost. While I may not preceed some of you fossils and my reputation may not be as well known at the local retirement home, I did have a significant # of posts. So go gum your food and polish your dentures, and learn to drive those 12s Mustang Mach 1s. Asses.
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 09:48 PM
  #24  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by 1BadAzzGT
Why would I worry about your turd?
I know reading can be very trying for you, however I clearly stated the following:
Originally Posted by SS RRR
you just worry about your terd and i'll worry about mine.
It's 2006 and you've managed to get slower as the years pass.
Ask Santa and maybe you'll run 11's...... miracles do happen.
It is 2006 and as the years pass you seem to break down more often than your usual SIX THOUSAND TIMES a year. Hell you could be classified well into the race car category with street car ET's. I'll take my slow turd over your rolling turd smelling deficit generating pile of garbage.
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 10:19 PM
  #25  
Mikie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 594
From: Belmont North Carolina.
Mr. Skinner

Whew, That was well put. Guess you showed me
Lets see.... You say Ford didnt make any vehicles that went fast. Hmmm What about the Lightning? Na ,you'd smoke it in your Holier than thou LT1 too. Also another brilliant comment from the forum rocket scientist
"Take any year BOTH the Camaro and Mustang were made and the Camaro pummels the Mustang" Ummmm...03-04 Cobra perhaps.
and remember you said Camaro vs Mustang, not vette and not GTs.
I figure you will tell me next how your LT1 puts the smackdown on them too
This is waaay too funny. Guys in my car club are reading this laughing their asses off at your explanation and logic of how great your car is.
LMFAO

LT1 vehicles are classics and I love them as much as any of my LS1 or Stangs in my stable, but your thought process is end all be all LT1. Why you may ask? Because YOU own it. If you owned an LS1 vette you would probably be arguing with the modded LT1 guys about how they cant compare with YOUR awesome ride.
Get my picture dude?
This is not about LT1, LS1 or any Stang made. This is about how YOUR car is the greatest and ours...( even though we owned the same cars as you ) were not comparable to YOURS

Junior , you need to go ahead. Pitch your tantrum and call me/us a few more explitives and get it out of your system.

Last edited by Mikie; Dec 9, 2006 at 08:04 AM.
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 08:39 AM
  #26  
1BadAzzGT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 77
From: Pasadena, Md, USA
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by SS RRR
I know reading can be very trying for you, however I clearly stated the following:



It is 2006 and as the years pass you seem to break down more often than your usual SIX THOUSAND TIMES a year. Hell you could be classified well into the race car category with street car ET's. I'll take my slow turd over your rolling turd smelling deficit generating pile of garbage.
Does that mean you want to run heads up (at a track where I can use my transbrake) in 2007?
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 08:45 AM
  #27  
1BadAzzGT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 77
From: Pasadena, Md, USA
Wink

Originally Posted by SnakeSkinner28
You eat, sleep, and drink LT1s. Allow me to retort. I eat food, sleep in a bed, and drink beer. I drive my LT1, and I go after slow *** 06 Mustang GTs, and the old Mach 1s that had a version of the slowbra motor in it that always seemed to get wasted by the LS1 SS. And of course I know they dont make the Camaro anymore, you can refer to from the factory from whatever year your talking about jackass. If I were comparing a modern Camaro which there will be in 09, there would be no performance comparison, just like it always was. Mustang had a 2.5 year marketing jump on the Camaro to establish a name for itself, and Ford did a better job of marketing the Mustang since it was all it had. Chevy had the Corvette, which they still make. Without the Mustang, Ford had NOTHING that went fast. Just like now, and I dont count the GT .01% of the population can afford one. Take any year BOTH the Camaro and Mustang were made and the Camaro pummels the Mustang. "I can do this all day" , and dont let my low post count fool you. They redid the website a while ago and lots of peoples posts were lost. While I may not preceed some of you fossils and my reputation may not be as well known at the local retirement home, I did have a significant # of posts. So go gum your food and polish your dentures, and learn to drive those 12s Mustang Mach 1s. Asses.
Interpretation... bla bla bla ... bla bla bla ... bla bla bla .... bla bla bla mustang.... bla bla bla ford.... bla lba bla Camaro.
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #28  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by 1BadAzzGT
Does that mean you want to run heads up (at a track where I can use my transbrake) in 2007?
knowing how you drive? why the hell not!
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #29  
1BadAzzGT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 77
From: Pasadena, Md, USA
Originally Posted by SS RRR
knowing how you drive? why the hell not!
Great. I look forward to it.
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 10:23 AM
  #30  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by 1BadAzzGT
Great. I look forward to it.
Only bitches' talk **** (What)
Only bitches' talk **** (What)
Only bitches talk **** that's why we bustin' yo ****
Only bitches' talk **** (What)
Only bitches' talk **** (What)
Only bitches talk **** that's why we bustin' yo ****
We real *****s (what) ya'll hoes (ya'll hoes)
We real *****s (what) ya'll hoes (ya'll hoes)
We real *****s (what) ya'll hoes (ya'll hoes)
We real *****s (what) ya'll hoes (ya'll hoes)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 PM.