LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Steel versus aluminum rocker arms...Pros and cons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2004, 09:24 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Woodstown, NJ
Posts: 4,154
Steel versus aluminum rocker arms...Pros and cons?

I picked up a set of new Crane golds, but it seems like I've been stumbling across some bad news on not just the Cranes, but aluminum-bodied rockers altogether.

Do aluminum rockers deflect more than steel rockers? What is the BIG difference that would make someone pick a steel rocker over an aluminum?

Need a little help...if the majority says to use a steel rocker, then I need to send the Crane Golds back. Thanks in advance.

~Joe
RamAir95TA is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 09:29 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Spinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Fort Benning, GA
Posts: 2,947
Steel wont wear like aluminum (stress cycles) and eventually break.
Spinner is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 09:50 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
GreenDemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mishawaka, IN
Posts: 1,771
I read about that too. It has to do with how the metal reacts to force. The steel stays rigid all the way to a certain point, then it starts to bend. The aluminum starts bending at a much lower level. So the aluminum is always flexing to a small extent, whereas the steel stays rigid.

I don't think the deflection would have anything to do with lift #s or valve float, etc, just the reliability of the rocker. The only pro to aluminum would have to be the lighter weight I would think.

Unless someone can say something else good about the aluminum rockers over steel I would always choose Comp's pro mags...
GreenDemon is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 09:51 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Eddie95Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Detroit Michigan USA
Posts: 656
I guess the pros of Aluminum is that they are lighter... but the Steel pro-mags are lighter over the nose and stronger... I myself went with the pro-mags because they are rebuildable and warrantied forever if the bodies break.
Eddie95Z28 is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 09:55 PM
  #5  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
I like aluminum for a hydraulic cam. With the relatively light springs used with a hydraulic cam, they are plenty stong enough. Longevity with these springs should be fine too. GM used them on the LT4, right? For a solid lifter cam and race level spring pressure I would go with a steel rocker though.

Rich Krause
rskrause is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 10:02 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Serene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 914
steel is what i would go with. most of the mass is concentrated on the pivot point of the rocker
Serene is offline  
Old 04-28-2004, 11:16 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 4,784
Pro mags all the way.
97WS6SCharged is offline  
Old 04-29-2004, 04:57 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Woodstown, NJ
Posts: 4,154
I'll be using one of the larger (236/242) XE grinds from Comp. Should I send the Crane Golds back and pick up the Pro Magnums, or will I be ok with them? I won't put many miles on the car once it is done, and will probably be a weekend/strip car.

Any more thoughts? Thanks.
RamAir95TA is offline  
Old 04-29-2004, 05:07 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
simple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 2,195
ProMags are rebuildable by Comp, thats one of a few very good qualities about them
simple is offline  
Old 04-29-2004, 06:45 AM
  #10  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Originally posted by RamAir95TA
I'll be using one of the larger (236/242) XE grinds from Comp. Should I send the Crane Golds back and pick up the Pro Magnums, or will I be ok with them? I won't put many miles on the car once it is done, and will probably be a weekend/strip car.

Any more thoughts? Thanks.
I wouldn't hesitate to use them. But if it will make you feel better, get the Pro-Mags. As I said previously, I have used both with no problems and would only say that if you are running a spring with >300-350lbs over the nose that you should stick with a steel rocker if you plan to get a lot of miles out of them. Of course, cars with >300-350lbs tend not to see many miles between rebuilds anyway

Rich
rskrause is offline  
Old 04-29-2004, 07:13 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Petersham, MA
Posts: 1,697
Originally posted by Spinner
Steel wont wear like aluminum (stress cycles) and eventually break.
Comp Pro Mags are 8650 chromemoly steel, which is THREE times stronger than the 7075 aluminum used in Crane's. It's not even a contest.

If you're talking about stamped steel rockers, then you're absolutely right about them breaking.
Josh-'04 GTO is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HarleyZ28
Cars For Sale
1
10-05-2015 06:23 AM
2QUIK6
Parts For Sale
2
07-15-2015 07:46 PM
DirtyDaveW
Parts For Sale
1
03-15-2015 07:01 PM
Red_94Formula
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
03-07-2015 09:21 AM



Quick Reply: Steel versus aluminum rocker arms...Pros and cons?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.