? on Record RWHP on a stock bottom LT1 N/A, Hows 452!
07-07-2003, 05:05 PM
#16
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: VA
Posts: 185
Originally posted by 97bowtie
That's ridiculous - kickass numbers man!
I'm curious how the ports have been shaped - there is more than just volume coming into play w/those heads. You guys are definitely breaking new ground.
That's ridiculous - kickass numbers man!
I'm curious how the ports have been shaped - there is more than just volume coming into play w/those heads. You guys are definitely breaking new ground.
Anyway I take those heads and give them to Eric Bradby and he does his magic. The heads are flowed and then the flow specs are given to Joe Overton who comes up with the custom cam and does the tuning. These guys are EXTREMELY busy people and take work on a case by case basis. In other words it's not like they are out looking for work if you know what I mean. I will also say their work is not cheap but VERY competative with the big name porters WITH BETTER RESULTS!!!
DO NOT call Joe to just pump him for info, that will not work.
Here is Joe's homepage.
http://hometown.aol.com/one94ta2try/...age/index.html
Gotta eat more info later.
07-07-2003, 05:33 PM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: sarasota, fl
Posts: 2,456
Originally posted by Dr.Mudge
No correction factor? Unfortunately leads us to assume that is total, uncorrected horsepower. If its still trapping 114, its certainly not 450+ SAE RWHP.
No correction factor? Unfortunately leads us to assume that is total, uncorrected horsepower. If its still trapping 114, its certainly not 450+ SAE RWHP.
if ported lt1 castings can get 400-410rwhp...........then i should hope that AFR 195 LT4 ported castings can get 440-450
otherwise id be pissed i spent all that extra money.
07-07-2003, 05:36 PM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: sarasota, fl
Posts: 2,456
Originally posted by Dr.Mudge
Even with 400 RWHP I expect more than 114 myself
Even with 400 RWHP I expect more than 114 myself
what did yours trap?
07-07-2003, 05:48 PM
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: sarasota, fl
Posts: 2,456
Originally posted by Dr.Mudge
Nope, sorry
Drag is boring to me. I may be watching too many LS1 cars zoom buy though, cam swap gives them 114 easy with a 224/224, they have that slight weight and distro advantage too.
Nope, sorry
Drag is boring to me. I may be watching too many LS1 cars zoom buy though, cam swap gives them 114 easy with a 224/224, they have that slight weight and distro advantage too.
yeah, i know bolton + cam LS1s putting down 380-390rwhp...........stills tock heads...........it pisses me off!!!
400rwhp lt1 guys (still 350ci) seem to trap about 115 from all the timeslips ive seen. maybe someone else will chime in.
07-07-2003, 05:49 PM
#24
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: VA
Posts: 185
Originally posted by AlexA
Nice numbers...can you list your mods? Solid roller I assume? What kind of intake? Is it stock style FI?
452rwhp with a 350 LT1 demands more info!!!
-Alex
Nice numbers...can you list your mods? Solid roller I assume? What kind of intake? Is it stock style FI?
452rwhp with a 350 LT1 demands more info!!!
-Alex
07-07-2003, 05:58 PM
#25
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: VA
Posts: 185
I KNEW I forgot to post something!................
Those numbers ARE corrected!!!!!!! Call the guys at the shop and ask. Brett told me specifically to mention that and I forgot. He knew that would come up.
According to other sources in the area this dyno runs LOWER numbers than the dynojet at the other shop. I will throw the car on a dynojet when I get a chnace. Every now and then the dynojet guys have a special and you get 3 runs for $25. I'll hit that and post the numbers when it happens.
Those numbers ARE corrected!!!!!!! Call the guys at the shop and ask. Brett told me specifically to mention that and I forgot. He knew that would come up.
According to other sources in the area this dyno runs LOWER numbers than the dynojet at the other shop. I will throw the car on a dynojet when I get a chnace. Every now and then the dynojet guys have a special and you get 3 runs for $25. I'll hit that and post the numbers when it happens.
07-07-2003, 06:09 PM
#28
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: VA
Posts: 185
Originally posted by kmook
Very nice numbers!
Give us some more info on the setup, and didnt you use to have a D1? What happended with that?
Very nice numbers!
Give us some more info on the setup, and didnt you use to have a D1? What happended with that?
From the old vid of Quickshotkimber and I, I would say I put down 350ish to the wheels. Those heads were not all that when new but they are now.
The car has FLP LT's w/ORP and an wideopen Borla on the dyno. AFR heads, LT4 ported intake (yes by Eric
) A CAM Meziere electric WP, Cloyes timing chain. Comp pro mag 1.6 rockers, stock lifters, all the normal bolt-on crap we do. 3.73 gear, even pullies. I'm old and tend to forget. TBB yada, yada.Ken, I'll bet you're thinking of Shawn Wickerby. Our user names are almost identicle and the cars are too.
.....'cept I'm N/A.
07-07-2003, 06:12 PM
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Portsmouth,VA
Posts: 336
Awsome #s Gary. Guys, you're not taking alot of things into account. He has a fully loaded convert with both seats in at the track. It was over 90 degrees that day. He smoked the heck out of his clutch on the second pass, so we knew that he had to baby it. He babied the car out of the hole and rolled into it at about 80 of 90'. This was also before they got the car fully tuned. He went from 419 to 452 when they were finished.
This dyno has been showing a little less than the dynojet in our area and they are corrected #s! I put down 400 on the same dyno with stock tune and broke the straps on the tuned run! My pig ran 11.9s in a 105 heat index this sat at 113. I was cutting 1.7 60fts compared to his 2.0s and he still had more mph. I will send vids to anyone that doubts his car. I beat him by 3 or 4 cars from 40 to 100 with the first setup. It is a whole nother story now. I'll bet they are the second best flowing LT1 heads in the land, next to Joe's of course!
As far as his cam, it's a one of a kind.
This dyno has been showing a little less than the dynojet in our area and they are corrected #s! I put down 400 on the same dyno with stock tune and broke the straps on the tuned run! My pig ran 11.9s in a 105 heat index this sat at 113. I was cutting 1.7 60fts compared to his 2.0s and he still had more mph. I will send vids to anyone that doubts his car. I beat him by 3 or 4 cars from 40 to 100 with the first setup. It is a whole nother story now. I'll bet they are the second best flowing LT1 heads in the land, next to Joe's of course!
As far as his cam, it's a one of a kind.