LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Question about Knock retard

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 11:49 PM
  #1  
Warlock1313's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 146
Talking Question about Knock retard

I believe I found my hesition, I was watching my spark advance and knock detected, and knock retard data with my snap on scanner.
I found that from a stop if I punch it the timing goes from 19*@idle spark advance to 0* spark advance and approx. 6* knock retard, as it nears 3000rpm knock retard goes to 0* and spark advance increases.

I found a link reguarding desensitizing the knock sensor by installing a couple resistors. I could only find a resistor that was 4.7k so I installed it as a bypass of the knock sensor (testing only) and there is no more knock retard but the spark advance drops to approx. 2* when I floor it from a stop and then increases at a pcm given rate. The hesition is alot less drastic and the car feels smoother/more responsive.

Is it possible to retain more base pcm timing with this or any mod?
Would I need a reprogram to achieve this?

I would like to retain as much base timing when I floor it and advance from there.
e.g.- 92 camaro sbc base timing(dist.) 14* btc + pcm timing advance


thx
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 12:07 AM
  #2  
turbo_Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,515
From: Kansas
Re: Question about Knock retard

Only way to advance the timing that I am aware of is with software like tunercat or LT1edit... there may be a timing controller with a spark advance dial out there but tuning would be far cheaper.
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 09:39 AM
  #3  
Warlock1313's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 146
Re: Question about Knock retard

ttt
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 10:42 AM
  #4  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Re: Question about Knock retard

I am not really sure exactly what you are asking. But after trying a bunch of things to cure "false knock" I turned off knock retard (in the program) years ago and never looked back.

Rich
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #5  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: Question about Knock retard

Originally Posted by Warlock1313
I found a link reguarding desensitizing the knock sensor by installing a couple resistors. I could only find a resistor that was 4.7k so I installed it as a bypass of the knock sensor (testing only) and there is no more knock retard but the spark advance drops to approx. 2* when I floor it from a stop and then increases at a pcm given rate. The hesition is alot less drastic and the car feels smoother/more responsive.
Are you sure it reads 2-deg under those conditions? I have looked at an awful lot of data logs, and never seen anything below maybe 18-deg.

How did you "bypass" the knock sensor? If you put the voltage in the circuit out of range (1.5-3.5V) you would get a code for the knock sensor and the PCM would default to a table of knock retard vs. various operating parameters, and you wold see almost continuous retard, up to 15-deg at times. An 18-deg advance pulled off the PCM's timing table, minus 15-deg of retard would put you suspicioulsy close to the 2-deg number you see. But you say you have no knock retard showing with that circuit?????

And just to clarify... there is no "base + adv." in the PCM tables.... there is a specific spark advance value programmed into a table with a grid of cells defined by engine load (MAP) on one axis and RPM on the other.
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 03:03 PM
  #6  
Warlock1313's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 146
Re: Question about Knock retard

Before:
At idle the spark advance was 19* I go WOT and it drops to 0-2* spark advance and 6* knock retard. slowly the spark advance increases and retard lowers as rpms increase till I hit 2500-3000 rpm's @36-38* advance.

After:
Now at idle its reads 19* spark advance, I go WOT and the timing drops down to 2 degrees of spark advance with no retard, then it will slowly increase advance till gets to 2.5k-3k.(approx 36-38*)

The bypass was based of a thread I found reguarding desensatizing the knock sensor. I didn't have the resistors needed at the time. Here's the link:
http://www.charm.net/~mchaney/knock.gif
I took the reading of 3900 ohm's at the sensor added the R1 resistor value (975 ohm's)= 4875ohm's. I had a 4700 ohm resistor on hand so I then connected it to the knock sensor connector then to ground. (hence the bypass) I have no idea why spark advance drops from 19* at idle to 2* at WOT and bilds from there.
I know there isn't really a base timimg with these cars. I was interested if it were possible to have/set the timing map to go no lower than 14* from idle to WOT. Like older distributor cars where there was a base timing manually set and advance was subject to the pcm tables.

Last edited by Warlock1313; Aug 19, 2005 at 03:06 PM.
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 03:28 PM
  #7  
Warlock1313's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 146
Re: Question about Knock retard

ttt-Injuneer
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 08:31 PM
  #8  
Warlock1313's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 146
Re: Question about Knock retard

ok so I got the knock sensor mod done I go for a test drive and make 4 WOT passes all 4 left 60ft worth of rubber stripes on the asphalt. get back the shop clean up and head home, on the way home I tried making a couple WOT passes and its back to normal ...hesitates off the line.

WTF, this thing should s*hit and get.

anyone else have any ideas?????
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 07:55 AM
  #9  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: Question about Knock retard

I have the "less than 4,000rpm" stock timing table in my online scanner writeup.... scroll down about 3/4 of the way to the bottom:

http://members.aol.com/InjuneerZZ/ScanMast.htm

As you can see, the lowest value programmed into the table is 8-dg. Assuming you were at 1,000rpm when you floored it, you should see 9deg of advance. If you are getting a few deg of knock retard, it is possible to see what you are getting.

From the numbers you are quoting, seems like there is a lot of knock retard AT TIMES. Could be an intermittent wiring problem with the sensor, although you should be getting a DTC 43 code for the KS. Are you getting a code?

How was the coolant temp on the 4 pulls that laid rubber, vs. your later attempts when power was down?

How are you getting the advance and retard numbers? Do you have a data log that I could look at?
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #10  
Warlock1313's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 146
Re: Question about Knock retard

but there doesnt appear to be any kncok retard just spark advance drops to 0-2*. there are no codes, and to coolant temp was within 20* between the two runs. I use my snap-on scanner which has data log but I need to find the software for my computer. However there is somthing I want to try ,the four good pulls were just before I needed to turn on my head lights. I have under drive pulleys and at idle with the lights on plus fan on ,system voltage is at 10.9 volts.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
maybe2fast
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
Mar 16, 2015 11:59 AM
mikey4play
LT1 Based Engine Tech
22
Mar 15, 2015 11:45 AM
nophix
Fuel and Ignition
3
Nov 30, 2014 10:26 PM
IgorT.455/406
LT1 Based Engine Tech
31
Feb 1, 2005 06:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.