LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #16  
CGrant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 201
Originally Posted by slomarao
I dont know? They done tune obd1 cars so i dont know my a/f ratio either. I have a wet kit thats going on, it may end up as a dry kit so im going to need more injectors anyways. I understand DC and how it works, i wouldnt go past 80%.
speed inc (ls1speed) does tune obd1, i am taking my 95 to them in a couple of weeks to have my car fine-tuned.
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #17  
slomarao's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
well they told me they didnt. I asked if they could fine tune my car and they said to send my pcm off to pcm4less when im done with the graph so Bryan could re tune my car. Dont know why they would want your business and would turn me away??

Larry told me they dont do anything with odb1 anymore. Its too old and only a few customers need it.
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 10:45 AM
  #18  
whyrun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 198
From: Abingdon,VA
I was under the impression that what most people wanted, to go back to OBD1 for easy of tuning less crap to deal with
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 02:22 AM
  #19  
lt1stroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 186
How the hell did get those numbers?? My car barley made 310rwhp??? Maybe because i really dont have a stroker and a cam, but regardless, you have no cam and just boltons and basic headwork and you made that much??? TELL ME!!!
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 03:00 AM
  #20  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Sounds too high taking into account others with similar mods. Were these numbers corredcted to SAE, STP, anything?
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 03:26 AM
  #21  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Dynos rule!
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #22  
truedualws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,406
From: Downey, CA
Originally Posted by SS RRR
Dynos rule!
Oh, come on, dynos are FUN!
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 11:13 AM
  #23  
slomarao's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
I have the graph is someone wants to post it. I cant figure out how to do it.

Its not BS. I have every bolt on except a ewp and some headwork. I dont see why its hard to believe??

Numbers are corrected. SAE
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #24  
whyrun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 198
From: Abingdon,VA
I guess its fun to get dyno numbers and having a general idea of what kind of HP your engine is producing but I think there is to much put into to dyno sheets.. I think the real tell,tell is track times I know alot of outlaw guys don't even know the HP their cars are producing they just kinda guess at it they rely on ET plus every dyno is diffrent Software process diffrences, auto vs m6 the way the car is sitting on the rollers has alot to do with it..

Last edited by whyrun; Aug 16, 2008 at 12:51 PM.
Old Aug 16, 2008 | 02:49 PM
  #25  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
I dont think people are calling BS. It's just that 323 RWHP SAE on a bolt on LT1 is stupid powerful especially having no cam. If the dyno is right, you have a serious bad *** freak motor which is not near the norm. That being said there is an unknown variable of some kind either with the dyno or your motor.

With that power, you should be able to easily post up a high 12 second ET time slip.
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 04:29 PM
  #26  
lt1-xjs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 426
From: Dayton, Ohio
Originally Posted by wrd1972
I dont think people are calling BS. It's just that 323 RWHP SAE on a bolt on LT1 is stupid powerful especially having no cam. If the dyno is right, you have a serious bad *** freak motor which is not near the norm. That being said there is an unknown variable of some kind either with the dyno or your motor.

With that power, you should be able to easily post up a high 12 second ET time slip.
The headwork alone would give him 15-25 rwhp., he should run 12.5x easy.
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 08:38 AM
  #27  
slomarao's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
me and my buddy who did the heads feel/think they worth 10-15rwhp. Which i think is a realistic figure. I have every other bolt on there is.

I looked and the record for bolt on dynos is 327/354 rw. So i am around 310rwhp with the bolt ons and than the 13rwhp from the heads and intake.


Ive said it before. Whoever wants the graph post your email.
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #28  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Was it a DynoJet?
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 11:27 AM
  #29  
slomarao's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
yep.
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 03:24 PM
  #30  
slomarao's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
how would i post the graph if i have it in my inbox? Mods- Sorry, dont know where to find out how to do it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 AM.