Is anyone experienced in designing a CAM?
Is anyone experienced in designing a CAM?
I talked to Atl Jar a while back about cam choice. What I was looking for is something that had the characteristics of Comp Cams XE grinds with the specs of a GM 847. What we were able to find are some lobes from Comp Cams that SBC HIR series.
The GM 847 specs are 234/242 .575/.595 112 LSA
Here are the lobes:
http://www.cranecams.com/?show=hydraulicroll#HIR
HIR-234/3600 290 .0040 157 .095 .059 .540 .576 .612 .634 B
HIR-242/3735 298 .0040 166 .112 .071 .560 .598 .635 .657 B
That should put us at a 234/242 .576/.598
Can anyone foresee a problem or complication for that cam choice?
thoughts?
The GM 847 specs are 234/242 .575/.595 112 LSA
Here are the lobes:
http://www.cranecams.com/?show=hydraulicroll#HIR
HIR-234/3600 290 .0040 157 .095 .059 .540 .576 .612 .634 B
HIR-242/3735 298 .0040 166 .112 .071 .560 .598 .635 .657 B
That should put us at a 234/242 .576/.598
Can anyone foresee a problem or complication for that cam choice?
thoughts?
Originally posted by Injuneer
Might want to mention what engine you are putting it in, what heads you are using and the flow #'s, and the intended use of the car.... street, strip, ?????
Might want to mention what engine you are putting it in, what heads you are using and the flow #'s, and the intended use of the car.... street, strip, ?????
Seriously, I'd like to help. But more detail (a lot) would add focus to my response.
Rich Krause
Its a street car. I plan on getting AI ported heads to go with it, but I'm fooling with the idea of a more serious cam. I have supporting mods such as long tube headers and what not. I didnt know if that cam would be able to create enough vacuum for breaks and things of this nature or if it would be so agressive that it would introduce a valve to a piston. If this is too agressive I'll wind up going with a GM847, but I wanted some advice first.
Originally posted by LeftoverChinese
Is there any way to tell what the cars behavior would be like with this cam VS the 847?
Is there any way to tell what the cars behavior would be like with this cam VS the 847?
What are you hoping to gain, more midlift duration? If that's the case the duration at 0.200" would be the best number to get.
Either cam will be marginal on vacuum for brakes.
Rich Krause
Its a more aggressive lobe similar to the XE grinds. I was hoping that it would peak lower in the RPM band and hopefully make more power that way. Thats the idea at any rate.
Can anyone provide me with a complete spec sheet on a GM847? So that I know what ICL and what not to get this cam.
edit: I spelt stuph rong
Can anyone provide me with a complete spec sheet on a GM847? So that I know what ICL and what not to get this cam.
edit: I spelt stuph rong
Last edited by LeftoverChinese; Mar 28, 2004 at 02:00 PM.
Originally posted by LeftoverChinese
TTT
Does anyone have the complete specs on a GM 847?
TTT
Does anyone have the complete specs on a GM 847?
112 LSA +4degs of Advance (108ICL and 116ECL)
Valve Events
Open @ .050 BTDC Intake 9 Exahust 57
Close @ .050 ABDC Intake 45 Exhaust 5
Lift with 1.6 Rockers .574/.595
No .200 duration numbers but I would expect:
150/158
Have those specs on file for comparison purposes.
Just did a camshaft that was for an application where the customer wanted about the same HP as a 847 but with more TQ. Ends up the cam should make 5-10more HP and 10-20ft lbs more TQ ar 4500rpm.
Bret
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Mar 30, 2015 12:40 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
Mar 19, 2015 02:24 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Mar 11, 2015 11:20 AM
dmaastr
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
Jul 1, 2002 02:22 PM



