AI200cc stock bottom end dyno results, 429rwhp with a miss

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 2, 2008 | 01:46 PM

#76

dangalla

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 2,092

From: lakeville, pa

Quote:

Originally Posted by speed_demon24

Yep. My car had nothing below 3k with the old setup. I was bogging to a 1.9-2.0 60' at the track with a quick slip of the clutch at 4k on nittos.

sounds familiar

Jan 2, 2008 | 10:00 PM

#77

turbo_Z

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 3,515

From: Kansas

I cant tell if those numbers are SAE or STD?

Jan 2, 2008 | 10:10 PM

#78

speed_demon24

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 3,245

From: Ocala, Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbo_Z

I cant tell if those numbers are SAE or STD?

SAE.

Jan 2, 2008 | 10:38 PM

#79

mdacton

Banned

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 4,970

From: Goochland, Va.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SS MPSTR

That's what I've always been told too.

I suspect the OP heads are a tad smaller than the heads they replaced

from what he is down in the intake runner CC is huge, he has alot more velocity now........good. Should have put some pop up pistons in and a three quarter cam to really wake it up

I'm running around a 180-5 cc intake and a 50 cc chamber, haven't run it yet but sounds pretty nasty

Jan 2, 2008 | 10:53 PM

#80

Z07

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 27

Great numbers dude, but was that motor smoking that much prior to the head swap?

Jan 2, 2008 | 11:25 PM

#81

SS MPSTR

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2001

Posts: 2,525

From: SoCal

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdacton

I'm running around a 180-5 cc intake and a 50 cc chamber, haven't run it yet but sounds pretty nasty

with what compression? 14:1?

Jan 3, 2008 | 12:57 AM

#82

Z-RATED94

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 3,557

From: Carol Stream, Il.

I'm still confused. Could the OP state the cc of the heads intake runner on both the old heads and the new? Thanks.

Jan 3, 2008 | 02:17 AM

#83

speed_demon24

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 3,245

From: Ocala, Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z-RATED94

I'm still confused. Could the OP state the cc of the heads intake runner on both the old heads and the new? Thanks.

Old heads ~218cc's, new heads ~200cc's.

Jan 3, 2008 | 02:51 AM

#84

Z-RATED94

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 3,557

From: Carol Stream, Il.

Quote:

Originally Posted by speed_demon24

Old heads ~218cc's, new heads ~200cc's.

OK, I thought his maximum effort head was 208cc. Never heard of one that was ported that much. But then again, I lead a sheltered life. LOL

Jan 3, 2008 | 03:28 AM

#85

97SS0594

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 1,651

From: baycity, mi

great numbers! even if you run 12's ill congradulate ya! mine only goes 11.5 but ive trapped as high as 124

hopefully your luck isnt as bad as mine!

Jan 3, 2008 | 04:25 AM

#86

Kaj

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 564

From: Cody,Wyoming 82414

Definetely keep us posted man, I'm currently looking into buying a pair of AI's Dart Pro-1's w/ custom grind cam. Seeing stock bottom end 6spd cars put up this HP w/ AI heads makes my day! I hope to see a 120+mph trap in the near future.