LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

AI200cc stock bottom end dyno results, 429rwhp with a miss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2007, 11:19 AM
  #46  
Registered User
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,525
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
so with the only changes as going back to a stock intake and the AI heads/cam setup I gained 24rwhp.
what stage LE heads/cam did you have again?
SS MPSTR is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 11:26 AM
  #47  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 3,245
Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
what stage LE heads/cam did you have again?
LE2 heads with a BRE cam,... not sure what stage my cam was but it's the cam he reccomended for my stock bottom end just like AI's.
speed_demon24 is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 11:30 AM
  #48  
Registered User
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,525
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
LE2 heads with a BRE cam,... not sure what stage my cam was but it's the cam he reccomended for my stock bottom end just like AI's.
I don't think they knew what 'stage' your cam was either. Isn't your car the one that had the valve guides all screwed up? I think your car is the closest one we have to compare company 'A' product with company 'L' product, no? Has anything else been changed that might skew performance numbers? I want to be fair here.
SS MPSTR is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:50 PM
  #49  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 3,245
Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
I don't think they knew what 'stage' your cam was either. Isn't your car the one that had the valve guides all screwed up? I think your car is the closest one we have to compare company 'A' product with company 'L' product, no? Has anything else been changed that might skew performance numbers? I want to be fair here.
Nope. Only changes were going back to the stock intake, swapping the heads and cam. I also changed the oil pump and pan, but if anything thats costing me more power since I have the higher releif spring in it. And yeah all the valve guides were cracked. I know of another car that did the swap but I'm not sure AI or the owner of the car wants the gains to be posted, but they were bigger than mine.
speed_demon24 is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 03:43 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
JP95ZM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 747
Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
Just curious - what was your trap speed?
117 something
JP95ZM6 is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:13 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
dangalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: lakeville, pa
Posts: 2,093
Out of curiosity

Did AI measure your intake runner size before they started, and also did they measure your combustion chamber size?

more than anything, I am wondering for my own knowledge
dangalla is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:19 PM
  #52  
Banned
 
mdacton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Goochland, Va.
Posts: 4,974
Originally Posted by dangalla
Out of curiosity

Did AI measure your intake runner size before they started, and also did they measure your combustion chamber size?

more than anything, I am wondering for my own knowledge
I will let you on in a secret...but don't tell anyone
What ever head flows more@.300 and .400 with the smallest intake runner is the head you want. I know people with really high nuimbers but I know for a fact I make wayyy wayy more power with a smaller head. I don't know the specifics of why but I know.
mdacton is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:34 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,193
Lol how many hundreds of LE vs Ai posts have there been? And now numbers show a back to back comparison (as close as this board will likely ever get) with an obvious "winner."

Good to see some results.
tireburnin is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:56 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
firebirdStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,161
congrats on the AI setup! They really have their stuff together. Hell, two springs ago they only offered the 190cc intake port on stock castings, and that is what I bought, and I am at 438rwhp, but that is with a 385 bottom end.
That accomplishment on a stock bottom end with that many miles, WOW! That is awesome.
Wonder what those heads could do for me...
firebirdStud is offline  
Old 01-01-2008, 12:20 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
truedualws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Downey, CA
Posts: 1,406
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
I'm still in shock that I put out 429rwhp. My old setup did 405/372 with a ported intake, so with the only changes as going back to a stock intake and the AI heads/cam setup I gained 24rwhp.
Now you've got me thinking regarding the stock intake. I remember a post
somewhere where LE removes some huge amount of weight from an intake
when it's ported. Did you happen to weigh the stock vs. ported intakes?

I noticed that the work done on my intake is very subtle with the main effort
opening the front up for a 58mm TB, and of course any milling to match the
heads for proper sealing.
truedualws6 is offline  
Old 01-01-2008, 12:36 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,525
Originally Posted by mdacton
I will let you on in a secret...but don't tell anyone
What ever head flows more@.300 and .400 with the smallest intake runner is the head you want. I know people with really high nuimbers but I know for a fact I make wayyy wayy more power with a smaller head. I don't know the specifics of why but I know.
That's what I've always been told too.

I suspect the OP heads are a tad smaller than the heads they replaced
SS MPSTR is offline  
Old 01-01-2008, 01:11 PM
  #57  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 3,245
Originally Posted by truedualws6
Now you've got me thinking regarding the stock intake. I remember a post
somewhere where LE removes some huge amount of weight from an intake
when it's ported. Did you happen to weigh the stock vs. ported intakes?

I noticed that the work done on my intake is very subtle with the main effort
opening the front up for a 58mm TB, and of course any milling to match the
heads for proper sealing.
I never weight them but I can tell the stock one is definatly heavier than my old ported one. It was also really opened up in the runners as well.

Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
That's what I've always been told too.

I suspect the OP heads are a tad smaller than the heads they replaced
~18cc's to be exact.
speed_demon24 is offline  
Old 01-01-2008, 05:53 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
Kory 88 Iroc Lt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New Berlin Wi
Posts: 473
congrats on the good numbers.
Maybe this will be the incentive I need to finish mine so I can finally get it tuned.
Good job
Kory
Kory 88 Iroc Lt-1 is offline  
Old 01-02-2008, 08:21 AM
  #59  
Registered User
 
T/A lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 1,582
Nice numbers but the Canton oilpan you added is good for a few horsepower so if you made 10more rwhp with a little larger cam then you guys are the greatest thing since sliced bread huh?
T/A lt1 is offline  
Old 01-02-2008, 08:25 AM
  #60  
Registered User
 
dangalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: lakeville, pa
Posts: 2,093
Originally Posted by T/A lt1
Nice numbers but the Canton oilpan you added is good for a few horsepower so if you made 10more rwhp with a little larger cam then you guys are the greatest thing since sliced bread huh?
and my question about combustion chamber size was also disregarded, without knowing that nobody can pass judgement

a little bigger cam and a little smaller chamber and you easily get the results shown here. i am in no way advocating anyone just think if everyone is gonna judge the facts should be straight
dangalla is offline  


Quick Reply: AI200cc stock bottom end dyno results, 429rwhp with a miss



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.