383 stroker bore?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 521
From: Bryant, Arkansas
383 stroker bore?
I plan on going with a 383 stroker for my LT1, what is the bore for a 383... this is somewhat new to me. help me out.
if there is anything else I need to know, let me know
thanks.
if there is anything else I need to know, let me know
thanks.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 11
Moderator
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
It is often said, including by yours truly, that in almost all cases when planning a build go for the most cubes that are practical. That said, you need to keep in mind that the power comes from the heads/cam/induction system and valvetrain primarily. So, these need to be selected to complement the displacement. IF you leave everything else the same, the 383 is still a better choice. It will have ~5% more torque and a bit more hp than a 355 at a slightly lower rpm - all good for the street. But just because it's a "stroker" doesn't mean it will be fast. You still need to concentrate your efforts on the top end if you want results.
A Chev 350 is 4.000"x3.480"
Rich
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,456
It is often said, including by yours truly, that in almost all cases when planning a build go for the most cubes that are practical. That said, you need to keep in mind that the power comes from the heads/cam/induction system and valvetrain primarily. So, these need to be selected to complement the displacement. IF you leave everything else the same, the 383 is still a better choice. It will have ~5% more torque and a bit more hp than a 355 at a slightly lower rpm - all good for the street. But just because it's a "stroker" doesn't mean it will be fast. You still need to concentrate your efforts on the top end if you want results.
A Chev 350 is 4.000"x3.480"
Rich
A Chev 350 is 4.000"x3.480"
Rich
Banned
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Ain't what I read!!!!!!!
Big cube small blocks take mega heads and intake to make power as per HP per CID.
Those type of heads(400+CFM) cost 7-8 grand and an intake to match is 'bout 1500.00.
So if ya want a 454 small block bring your checkbook.
A 383 can do fair with a max ported set of stockers.
Big cube small blocks take mega heads and intake to make power as per HP per CID.
Those type of heads(400+CFM) cost 7-8 grand and an intake to match is 'bout 1500.00.
So if ya want a 454 small block bring your checkbook.
A 383 can do fair with a max ported set of stockers.
Administrator
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
And there is nothing that requires you to build EXACTLY a 383 (actually 382.67ci). You shouldn't bore the block any more than you need to..... 4.010" (378.88ci) or 4.020" (380.77ci) bores are smart alternatives, allowing the cylinder walls to retain more of their strength, and allowing more meat for a future rebuild. You will never notice the small difference in displacement.
Last edited by Injuneer; Nov 18, 2007 at 09:29 PM.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 521
From: Bryant, Arkansas
well do you think I should just stick with a 355 or go ahead with the 383. My plans are the cc306, ported stock heads, edelbrock air gap intake. all gasket matched, I have 1.6rr, pushrods, springs, etc...
thanks
thanks
Moderator
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Rich
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,154
From: VA
A bit of searching would also answer most of these questions.
