LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

***Ai 383R long block with TFS 215 heads goes 9.6@139.9mph NA ***

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #61  
The Engineer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,388
From: Moore Oklahoma
Originally Posted by mdacton
Why......to run all 15 people that show up?

screw that shootout it sucks.
First, the people that hosted the 1st LTX Shoot-Out put a lot of really hard work into the event, did a super job with everything and it was a big success. Also, a lot of fun for everyone involved and the people who raced in the event. I'm very glad I was at this first shoot-out!

And, next year's event will be event bigger and better! I'll be there to race again next year and encourage every LTX person to be there.

Warren
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #62  
bombebomb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by tireburnin
No I said the parts that Rick runs are the same as anything you could buy through Ai. Rick bought a crate engine from Ai to run in his car that was complete, tuned and ready to go. You could purchase that same engine and be making 550rwhp through an auto if you so desired.

A 9 second car is much different than a high horsepower motor. You can have either or both, but the power doesn't garuntee the ET.

And as for the very quick car on the street, I have a feeling you have never driven a very quick car on the street or raced one at the track. 550rwhp is going to be LOUD, aggressive and will break the tires loose at 60+ mph. That kind of power can break many parts at the worst times.

Cruising with a fast car is nice, but trying to go to work isn't as fun in one.
Hey, it being a street/strip car came from the horses mouth, its not some random opinion im throwing at you.
This is truly a Street/Strip engine
AI makes it sound like you can buy this motor and drive it for a DD. Which if your not an idiot, im sure you could, just put on drag radials, take the wheelie bar off, and dont go around flooring it. I misread about what the engine was made of, I was under the impression that it was simply a heads and cam 383 car. Which in the end heads and cam is where the power is.

Originally Posted by 526 SS 96
Sure, you can drive a fast car on the street safely... it just won't run 9.64 @140 MPH from the red light to Wendy's. It's going to need a track for that.

The Ai 383-R is a turn key engine & ECU package, not a typical cam and heads package and mail order tune. However, the Ai TFS 215cc CNC head is the same port regardless of customer. So, no, you will not bolt on these heads to a stock 200,000 mi. short block, 4:10 10 bolt, 2,500 rpm converter on a stock A4, and get the same performance/ reliability.
You mean 4.10:1 not 4:10. I agree with you running 9.64 on the street.
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #63  
aboatguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 325
From: Back in the US of F'in A
Originally Posted by whyrun
I agree that car seems to be their advertising token, I'm sure there's been alot more time put into working his heads and designing that valvetrain and cam combo than what the average Joe would get for his money

I don't know about that comment time comment. In my opinion Ron/Phil are honest guys with integrity so if they say that the heads are the same I believe them and if they advertise crate engines that deliver( Ai .357R - 570hp / 465-500rwhp SAE
Ai .383R - 630hp / 530-560rwhp SAE
Ai LTx13 - 7XXhp / 600-650rwhp SAE)
I take it as a STATEMENT OF FACT.

Now as for value for the money Ron and Phil have spent more time with me than I thought they would, especially for the relatively small amount of money I spent with them.

Mike

Last edited by aboatguy; Oct 4, 2008 at 08:33 AM.
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 08:35 PM
  #64  
CSJTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 274
From: Rich, Va.
The truth about Joe O's car

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ure/index.html

Not converted heads or well under 3000 pounds

Give the man his props, he did this a few years ago, as did quite a few others so it's nothing magic, it's a combination of time and money

Props to AI and Rick for putting together a great package
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #65  
tireburnin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,193
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by CSJTA
The truth about Joe O's car

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ure/index.html

Not converted heads or well under 3000 pounds

Give the man his props, he did this a few years ago, as did quite a few others so it's nothing magic, it's a combination of time and money

Props to AI and Rick for putting together a great package
I edited the post on LS1tech and forgot this one. And I'm not calling that article incorrect, but it is a stretch in some areas.

I mean really 3019Lb race weight - 200lb estimated driver = 2819lb car. (That fits my definition of well under but to each there own)

As for converted heads, I guess I will defer to the horses mouth:
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...4&postcount=37

Last edited by tireburnin; Oct 5, 2008 at 11:48 AM.
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 11:46 AM
  #66  
tireburnin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,193
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by mdacton
We both known joe along time.....

Joe still has the stock factory spline drive opti on the car, AFR 227 heads.......Its all in the details. I know what the heads flow to.....nothing impressive. Less than wht alot of you guys claims on stock castings.
I guess they flow less than stock castings at .300? Funny how the memory can blur reality as time passes.

https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...4&postcount=37
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 05:29 PM
  #67  
CSJTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 274
From: Rich, Va.
No arguments here

They are not converted heads

The raceweight is the weight of the car without driver

Like I said, props to Ai and Rick for a quick combo

All it takes is time and money
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #68  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
There is an update on Rick's car.

1/8th 6.04/113.1 and 1/4 9.55/141.89

This was with even more timing pulled(20 degrees) to get the launch under control.

What was Overton's MPH and weight again?
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 09:49 PM
  #69  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
There is an update on Rick's car.

1/8th 6.04/113.1 and 1/4 9.55/141.89

This was with even more timing pulled(20 degrees) to get the launch under control.

What was Overton's MPH and weight again?
143. 9.30's 1.24 60'


I hope you guys aren't hating on the man......he did that what 6 years ago...
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 10:12 PM
  #70  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Not a matter of hating, it is an impressive setup, BUT IMO Rick's is still more impressive. Sort of like the 4400lbs Impala that goes mid 9s on a 4L60E, 8.5" rear and stock computer, may not be the fastest but when you look at what he is working with he is doing something better than most.
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 06:32 AM
  #71  
tomcowle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 463
From: GENEVA, Ohio
Who cares about streetability honestly? Your out to build a fast car when you order up a combination like AI is pushing here lets be real.

I don't know Joe O. personally but his accomplishment 6 years ago speaks volumns for the man knowledge.
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 07:14 AM
  #72  
whyrun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 198
From: Abingdon,VA
Originally Posted by tomcowle
Who cares about streetability honestly? Your out to build a fast car when you order up a combination like AI is pushing here lets be real.

I don't know Joe O. personally but his accomplishment 6 years ago speaks volumns for the man knowledge.

I got to agree with that. If you built a car that runs in the 9's streetability wasn't a concern when you were building it..
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 09:40 AM
  #73  
METALBEAST's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 261
Insane times! What track was this at?
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #74  
tireburnin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,193
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by mdacton
143. 9.30's 1.24 60'


I hope you guys aren't hating on the man......he did that what 6 years ago...
Time flies when you are posting on the internet. 4 years or 6 years, they are impressive times.
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...70&postcount=1
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 11:32 AM
  #75  
T/A lt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,582
From: Louisiana, USA
Originally Posted by whyrun
I got to agree with that. If you built a car that runs in the 9's streetability wasn't a concern when you were building it..
Streetable is a term that is used very loosely and everyone has an idea of what a streetcar should be. I am sorry but if the car doesn't get driven at all then it's no since in saying this combo would make an awesome street setup when it's never been run on the street. I always built my car to remain streetable and have been 9.80's, 3.55 gears out back, tight converter, exhaust etc... but everybody really only cares about how quick the car is no matter if it's driven or not. I have decided that I would not add a 10 point cage to make my car legal to run 9's b/c it would make the car very hard to cruise in and I don't want an all out racecar yet. This car is impressive but streetcar it's not. JMO Later Clint



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 PM.