LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

ls1 or lti???

Old 11-19-2004, 02:38 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
anasazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Milton, FL
Posts: 3,604
Re: ls1 or lti???

an LT1 caused world war 2
anasazi is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 02:41 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
anasazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Milton, FL
Posts: 3,604
Re: ls1 or lti???

oh yea, and who can forget the fact that hitler didn't die due to a bullet, he got hit by an LS1 powered vehicle, thus an LS1 ended World War 2, a war started by an LT1.


anasazi is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 03:03 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
FLeXNuTZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 207
Re: ls1 or lti???

The LT1 will start WW3 against the LS1 and emerge victorious because iron is better than aluminum Also, LT1s will be better at defending our country against terror attacks because of the power of "iron"
FLeXNuTZ is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 03:12 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
falchulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,881
Re: ls1 or lti???

Originally Posted by Shackleford
Don't forget the LT4. Upgraded version of the LT1. LS1s don't stand a chance against an LT4. OH YEAH!
I always thought that the lt4 barely equaled the LS1
falchulk is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 03:32 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
BirchMan98z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 969
Re: ls1 or lti???

Originally Posted by FLeXNuTZ
All I'll say is,"Watch out LS1 guys, watch out..."

we're real scared.
BirchMan98z is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 03:42 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
BirchMan98z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 969
Re: ls1 or lti???

Originally Posted by falchulk
I always thought that the lt4 barely equaled the LS1
The LT-4 is 330 hp and is somewhat comparable to an LS-1, but does NOT have more hp and torque. It has a higher compression ratio, slightly better heads, and a 6300redline. the lt-4 equipped 'vettes were good for low low 13's, sometimes into the 12's. Most people manage about a 13.7x with an lt-4 fbody. As far as LS-1's not standing a chance? Wake up buddy. Are you sure you weren't thinking about the LT5 zr-1 engine?

Last edited by BirchMan98z; 11-19-2004 at 03:46 PM.
BirchMan98z is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 04:58 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
Re: ls1 or lti???

Screw you all....................an IRON block, 6.0L LS2 will kill everything, bar none!

Although, the 7.0L LS7 should be a handful.................maybe not indestructable, but you'd have to catch it first!!
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 06:14 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
FLeXNuTZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 207
Re: ls1 or lti???

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
we're real scared.
Oh you will be. I will go BirchMan98z hunting in the near future
FLeXNuTZ is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 06:18 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
FLeXNuTZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 207
Re: ls1 or lti???

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
The LT-4 is 330 hp and is somewhat comparable to an LS-1, but does NOT have more hp and torque. It has a higher compression ratio, slightly better heads, and a 6300redline. the lt-4 equipped 'vettes were good for low low 13's, sometimes into the 12's. Most people manage about a 13.7x with an lt-4 fbody. As far as LS-1's not standing a chance? Wake up buddy. Are you sure you weren't thinking about the LT5 zr-1 engine?
Whoa, wait a minute here. The LSx head is far superior to the LTx head no matter what. Period. Just check this thread for proof

http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=318997
FLeXNuTZ is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 09:02 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Browns Mills, New Jersey
Posts: 3,224
Re: ls1 or lti???

Originally Posted by Shackleford
The LT4 has more horsepower and torque. Both have their pros and cons, but I'd generally assume the LT4 was an overall better performance engine. Higher potential, I guess.
Actually thats a false statement....LS1's generally dyno higher then LT4's
Antz97ZNJ is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 09:26 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
FLeXNuTZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 207
Re: ls1 or lti???

So in all honesty LT4 AFR heads that are worked to the max (from AI for example) should easily out perform the LS1 heads, right?
FLeXNuTZ is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 09:46 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
twozs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: hopewell jct(70 miles n of nyc)
Posts: 141
Re: ls1 or lti???

get a room, for christsake! more money = more power!
twozs is offline  
Old 11-19-2004, 10:57 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
meengreen 94z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 477
Re: ls1 or lti???

Originally Posted by FLeXNuTZ
So in all honesty LT4 AFR heads that are worked to the max (from AI for example) should easily out perform the LS1 heads, right?
No the most Ive heard out of any AFR LT4 227cc's or 215rr's is in the 330-340cfm intake range(although more is probably possible). Ive seen a few sets of LS6 heads in the 350-360cfm range, and Ive heard of someone getting near 370cfm, but I doubt it had decent port velocity. But theres other alternatives, you can convert SBC to reverse flow cooling and put them on an LT1(which you cant on an LS1). And if anyone ever gets a set of LT1 ARAO 32 valve heads to work(Bobby Simpson"The Big Show" is close), I dont see LSX castings being able to match their flow capability's(around 400cfm).

Really its more about the overall setup than just the heads. Joe Overton has AFR 227cc's on his LT1 and up until recently outran all NA LS1's using far less cubes than they were(his best is a 9.36 using 388ci)
meengreen 94z is offline  
Old 11-20-2004, 01:48 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
BirchMan98z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 969
Re: ls1 or lti???

Originally Posted by FLeXNuTZ
Whoa, wait a minute here. The LSx head is far superior to the LTx head no matter what. Period. Just check this thread for proof

http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=318997
Hm. think I got misunderstood. I meant LT-4 heads were better than lt-1 heads, not LS-1 heads. LOL And what does that link have to do with heads anyway? C5R heads flow well over 400cfm, and the new c6 z06 heads are supposed to flow near 370 stock. LS-1/6 heads flow great from the factory, and are able to flow some awesome numbers when ported to the max.

Last edited by BirchMan98z; 11-20-2004 at 01:50 AM.
BirchMan98z is offline  
Old 11-20-2004, 02:16 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
FLeXNuTZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 207
Re: ls1 or lti???

I stand corrected.
FLeXNuTZ is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: ls1 or lti???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.