Car Audio and Electronics Custom car audio/electronics questions and discussion

Sub Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 09:40 AM
  #16  
rage366's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 780
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sub Question

Originally posted by LS1 RULZ
I know that "sounds best" is subjective but personally I can't stand the sound of BP enclosures. Their double humped frequency response just doesn't cut it with me. It's true that a BP enclosure will give you the hardest hitting bass of all the enclosure options available but, by design, a BP masks distortion from the sub. This makes it easy for you to blow the sub without even knowing that you were pushing it too hard. Personally I like a sealed enclosure best since it has the best transient response of any enclosure. And it's also the most forgiving when it comes to having a slight mis-match between sub and enclosure. You can be off from the "ideal" enclosure volume and still get good results from the subwoofer. It also takes up the least amount of room inside your car. Vented enclosures are harder to get a good match between sub and enclosure (any mis-match isn't as forgiving as a sealed is) and they take up a lot more room as well.
you make good points: "sounds best" is very subjective.

Although distortion is a problem with bandpass enclosures, that can be fixed by purchasing a sub that has been properly matched acousticaly. i'll use the solobaric L5 as an exmple: if you buy the BPE (bandpass enclosure) from kicker, they have the sub and box acousticaly matched for you (not to mention they build them too), that takes much of the guessing out of it.

And, as far as blowing ur sub, which i've done a few times i usually try to match amps based on their respective RMSs'. That tends to help with blowing up expensive merchandise.

Yes, they take up more room, but you can always put them in a closed enclosure if u dont like it.

shokor
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 02:35 PM
  #17  
firebirdude's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,119
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sub Question

Originally posted by rage366
And, as far as blowing ur sub, which i've done a few times i usually try to match amps based on their respective RMSs'. That tends to help with blowing up expensive merchandise.
But it is still totally possible to blow a 500WRMS sub with a 500WRMS amp. You could have a leaky box. Or you could be playing music below your tuned freq. and cause the driver to unload. etc. etc. etc. etc. All box variables aside. If you send the signal into clipping, the sub won't last long either.

Last edited by firebirdude; Nov 24, 2002 at 02:43 PM.
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 05:12 PM
  #18  
shawnberry50's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 102
Thumbs up

the kicker sub L7 is one of the best subs on the market today.... no they do not need alot of space. Alpine are you kidding? those subs S"UC" why dont you buy some jensens while your at it.....
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 07:42 PM
  #19  
rage366's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 780
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sub Question

Originally posted by firebirdude
But it is still totally possible to blow a 500WRMS sub with a 500WRMS amp. You could have a leaky box. Or you could be playing music below your tuned freq. and cause the driver to unload. etc. etc. etc. etc. All box variables aside. If you send the signal into clipping, the sub won't last long either.
yeah, it's possible to blow it up (anything is possible), but my point was that if the sub+amp operate within a similar rms, the user will not have to worry about MAJORLY mis-matching parts...let's say a 1000 watt phoenix gold amp (rms 700 watts), with a 1000-watt kenwood amp (rms 400 watts).

also, i was assuming that the guy wont be playing his amp and sub AT rms, or even slightly lower...on average, ppl whom i've seen use about half of the total usable (rms) power potential of the sub and amp. Try driving your car at top speed all the time...it wont last nearly as long.

using a leaky box? well, that's like saying that the tires on your car will wear out much faster if you dont put air in them. :P

as far as the acoustics, any sub worth it's price in bubble gum, will be resiliant enough to withstand frequencies outside it's "ideal" range.

shokor
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 07:49 PM
  #20  
rage366's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 780
Originally posted by shawnberry50
the kicker sub L7 is one of the best subs on the market today.... no they do not need alot of space. Alpine are you kidding? those subs S"UC" why dont you buy some jensens while your at it.....
ur right, they dont NEED a lot of space, but the more space u give them, the harder they hit. i'm glad someone finally agrees with me about the solobarics!!

LMFAO @ jensens!! hehe, too d*amn funny!!
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 08:41 PM
  #21  
rthompson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 397
From: Warroad, MN
Originally posted by shawnberry50
the kicker sub L7 is one of the best subs on the market today.... no they do not need alot of space. Alpine are you kidding? those subs S"UC" why dont you buy some jensens while your at it.....
Sorry buddy you are SOOO very wrong, the 12" needs a 20 cube box to attain a .707 qtc, I guess if you don't care about sound quality go ahead and stick it in a small box. i guess to some people sound quality just doesn't matter. The OLD solo was made for small boxes and had respectable sound quality, but the new ones are pretty much just made to get loud... they do that pretty well, but are not the best at that either...

As far as best sub on the market... not even close.
If you want a better sub you don't have to look far.
RE XXX
JL W7
Adire Brahma
Eclipse Ti
ID Max
JBL GTI



As a matter of fact i would EASILY put the Alpine Type R ahead of the Solo in sound quality, altho the L7 will out do it in SPL.
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 08:46 PM
  #22  
firebirdude's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,119
Originally posted by rage366
Try driving your car at top speed all the time...it wont last nearly as long.

using a leaky box? well, that's like saying that the tires on your car will wear out much faster if you dont put air in them. :P
Apples and oranges.

Originally posted by rage366
as far as the acoustics, any sub worth it's price in bubble gum, will be resiliant enough to withstand frequencies outside it's "ideal" range.
The "IDEAL" range becomes much more narrow in a ported enclouser. Try playing a note that is 10-15 Hz below your tuned frequency. I'm not trying to argue with anybody, but a lot of people don't know how to set their gains properly or know that their box may have some leaks in it. I'm not saying they are stupid in any way, shape or form. They just don't know. That's were we come in!

And the L7 is a great woofer, but it DOES require a large box to give good SQ. Rtompson is correct. I'd take the Type R's for SQ anyday over the L7's.

Last edited by firebirdude; Nov 24, 2002 at 08:49 PM.
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 08:53 PM
  #23  
rthompson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 397
From: Warroad, MN
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sub Question

Originally posted by rage366

using a leaky box? well, that's like saying that the tires on your car will wear out much faster if you dont put air in them. :P

as far as the acoustics, any sub worth it's price in bubble gum, will be resiliant enough to withstand frequencies outside it's "ideal" range.

shokor
A sealed box with a leak in it will not cause a sub to blow, but it will cause it to sound like crap. But playing your sub below the tuning frequency of a ported box WILL cause the power handling to be greatly reduced... it is very possible to unload the sub the sub with way less than its rated power. Plain and simple DON'T play the sub below the tuning frequency, it will be VERY hard on the sub.
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 09:03 PM
  #24  
rage366's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 780
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sub Question

Originally posted by rthompson
A sealed box with a leak in it will not cause a sub to blow, but it will cause it to sound like crap. But playing your sub below the tuning frequency of a ported box WILL cause the power handling to be greatly reduced... it is very possible to unload the sub the sub with way less than its rated power. Plain and simple DON'T play the sub below the tuning frequency, it will be VERY hard on the sub.
the way a leaky box would cause a sub to blow is that it would not have enough pressure in teh box, so the user wouldnt know how much power the amp is getting, thereby, blowing it up...

long shot...but still can happen

as far as the frequency...the kicker box is set up for the sub frequency.
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 09:12 PM
  #25  
LS1 RULZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,858
From: OHIO Go Buckeyes!
Originally posted by rthompson
The OLD solo was made for small boxes and had respectable sound quality, but the new ones are pretty much just made to get loud... they do that pretty well, but are not the best at that either...
I agree with this 100%. I liked the old Solos. The new square subs don't impress me at all. Granted they play loud as hell but loud as hell doesn't mean they sound good. They have that "one note" bass sound to them. Every note from them just goes BOOM BOOM BOOM and thats it. At least thats what I hear from them.
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 10:29 PM
  #26  
shawnberry50's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 102
the subs you mentioned are good, well besides the alpine ones.... to each there own... ive had diomands, jl, hell even the focals. the kickers are the best dollar for dollar in my opinion. then again i would never ever spend five hundred dollars on one sub. already have and very unsatified.
Old Nov 25, 2002 | 01:38 AM
  #27  
4S Concepts SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 282
From: Charlotte, NC
what about the 10" 800 watt Pioneer Premier IMPP sub? I have the 12" 1000 watt version, and it sounds better than my friend with 2 JL W3s with a Rockford Amp. NOTE: I have not installed this sub in my camaro, was in my 95 Monte Carlo.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dluna333
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
15
Mar 13, 2015 12:30 PM
jasonduaine
LS1 Based Engine Tech
3
Mar 7, 2015 09:44 AM
30thZ4C
Wheels and Tires
2
Jan 29, 2015 06:03 PM
95z_28_camaro_4_Ivan
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Dec 19, 2014 08:48 PM
Hurin
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
4
Dec 13, 2014 07:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 AM.