What are your top 5 motors of the last 15 years?
By the no exotic clause the LT5 should not be listed. It was a hand built exspensive motor.In its six years only 4500 or less were put on the street. Smaller run than most porsce/ prancing horse cars.
I dont think by anymeans the LT5 is one of the top 5 motors from the last 15 years, but then agani its all on how you rate them. I'm going by perforance, reliability, practicality etc. The LT5 gets booted in my opinion because while it was a good motor for its time, its cost, and costs for repair etc. are way out of the league of your average car buyer. Its definately one of the top 5 "coolest" motors, but I dont think its one fo the top 5 "best."
If I had to make a top 5 coolest motors list itd be totally different. Just curious, are people making their picks by a "best engine" point of view or are they pickign their personal favorites?
If I had to make a top 5 coolest motors list itd be totally different. Just curious, are people making their picks by a "best engine" point of view or are they pickign their personal favorites?
Last edited by bigsteve7; Jun 3, 2003 at 02:51 PM.
I am suprised that only one other person (the guy who keeps spelling his name wrong
) mentioned the new I6 from GM. an I6 which puts out 275 horsepower, is very, VERY quiet and smooth! The same engine you can bolt on a supercharger to and get 400 little horsies out of (sounds boost friendly to me).........I am ashamed of you all!!!!
) mentioned the new I6 from GM. an I6 which puts out 275 horsepower, is very, VERY quiet and smooth! The same engine you can bolt on a supercharger to and get 400 little horsies out of (sounds boost friendly to me).........I am ashamed of you all!!!!
Originally posted by 1990 Turbo Grand Prix
3. Quad 4 (sound funky, but really was a good motor and the forerunner to the Northstar's technology)
3. Quad 4 (sound funky, but really was a good motor and the forerunner to the Northstar's technology)
I think other notable engines (beyond what has been mentioned earlier) -
*Honda S2000 Engine
*Neon SRT4 Engine
*VW VR6
*Chevy 305 - less than 200 HP out of a basic engine design that can handle more than 350HP doesn't sound impressive until you consider how overbuilt and indestructable these engines are. I've got 225,000 miles on mine and it still doesn't use any oil.
1. 2JZwatever I6 from the Supra TT (overbuilt and very potent)
2. 2003 S/c 4.6L Dohc (Same as above, gotta love the S/c and v8 combo)
3. Turbocharged 3.8L GN motor (15 years later and this engine still rocks)
4. Current m3 engine.
5. S2000 2.0L 240hp I4 (120hp/Lt)
2. 2003 S/c 4.6L Dohc (Same as above, gotta love the S/c and v8 combo)
3. Turbocharged 3.8L GN motor (15 years later and this engine still rocks)
4. Current m3 engine.
5. S2000 2.0L 240hp I4 (120hp/Lt)
Originally posted by Evil Turbo SS
Im surprised no one has mentioned the 5.4 lightning motor or the new 5.7 Hemi.
Im surprised no one has mentioned the 5.4 lightning motor or the new 5.7 Hemi.
1. Ford's 5.0 HO: The simplest, most durable, easiest to hop up engine on the planet. It got better fuel milage and more power than the so-called "more advanced" smaller 4.6. Any 1985 engine that lasts 220,000 miles and is still going strong when I sold it is no doubt a great engine.
2. GM's LT1: The reverse flow cooling and cam driven water pump was almost ingenious, as was the optispark (once GM figured how to properly seal it from water & dirt). Made impressive power, good fuel economy & extremely durable.
3. GM's 3.8 Turbo V6: Indestructable, underrated, and very responsive to hop-ups. Also by association, Buick's normally aspired 3.8 V6. This engine was designed in the early 60's, sold to ****** Jeep, bought back from Jeep, used in the 70s during the energy crisis, turbo'ed to unbelievable heights in the 80s, supercharged to unbelievable heights since then, and is still relevent today, 40 years after it was 1st designed. Indirectly it's the oldest American made powerplant.
4. Cadillac's Northstar V8: Perhaps the best engineered multi cam V8 on the planet. "Limp home" mode, though fairly common today, was genious when introduced. This engine singlehandely brought Cadillac back into the game and spawned an equally impressive smaller version used in Oldsmobile. There simply is no other car on the planet that equals this engine, even at Cadillac prices.
5. Last but not least, GM's LS1 & LS6 V8s: These 5.7 liter engines not only get from 340 to 400 horsepower, they also has the same fuel economy as a Toyota Solara's 198 horse 3.0 liter V6 (19/28 Z28 vs 20/27 Solara). These engines are advanced in every way from compact size & alumunum construction, to a advanced engine management system. Beyond piston slap, I've heard of no problems with these engines at all. The only down side is that these engines are already so pumped up, there isn't too much you can do to them. Wish all engines had that problem.
Honorable Mention:
Ford-Yamaha SHO V6: Free revving, high output, trouble free engine that escaped Ford's V6 headgasket debacle, and unlike the V8 version that replaced it, the engine had no tendancy to self destruct once the normal warranty ran out.
Ford's SC 4.6 V8: Here's an engine that puts out much the same ACTUAL horsepower as such engines as the 426 Hemi, Ram Air 2s, SD 455s, and a host of other "historic "muscle" powerplants.... out of just 281 cubic inches!
2. GM's LT1: The reverse flow cooling and cam driven water pump was almost ingenious, as was the optispark (once GM figured how to properly seal it from water & dirt). Made impressive power, good fuel economy & extremely durable.
3. GM's 3.8 Turbo V6: Indestructable, underrated, and very responsive to hop-ups. Also by association, Buick's normally aspired 3.8 V6. This engine was designed in the early 60's, sold to ****** Jeep, bought back from Jeep, used in the 70s during the energy crisis, turbo'ed to unbelievable heights in the 80s, supercharged to unbelievable heights since then, and is still relevent today, 40 years after it was 1st designed. Indirectly it's the oldest American made powerplant.
4. Cadillac's Northstar V8: Perhaps the best engineered multi cam V8 on the planet. "Limp home" mode, though fairly common today, was genious when introduced. This engine singlehandely brought Cadillac back into the game and spawned an equally impressive smaller version used in Oldsmobile. There simply is no other car on the planet that equals this engine, even at Cadillac prices.
5. Last but not least, GM's LS1 & LS6 V8s: These 5.7 liter engines not only get from 340 to 400 horsepower, they also has the same fuel economy as a Toyota Solara's 198 horse 3.0 liter V6 (19/28 Z28 vs 20/27 Solara). These engines are advanced in every way from compact size & alumunum construction, to a advanced engine management system. Beyond piston slap, I've heard of no problems with these engines at all. The only down side is that these engines are already so pumped up, there isn't too much you can do to them. Wish all engines had that problem.
Honorable Mention:
Ford-Yamaha SHO V6: Free revving, high output, trouble free engine that escaped Ford's V6 headgasket debacle, and unlike the V8 version that replaced it, the engine had no tendancy to self destruct once the normal warranty ran out.
Ford's SC 4.6 V8: Here's an engine that puts out much the same ACTUAL horsepower as such engines as the 426 Hemi, Ram Air 2s, SD 455s, and a host of other "historic "muscle" powerplants.... out of just 281 cubic inches!
The L98. Torque!! Whoo Hooo!! This is the engine that brought back real performance to the F-Body when all there was before was pretty low powered 305's. Ever since the 350 TPI our cars have been getting faster and progressing back to real muscle, they basically started it off again. 5.7 Liters, 225HP, 330TQ, 6 sec 0-60's, and low 14's in 87 was definetly something to talk about. This was probably the 1st actually good fuel injected GM engine with some power, gas mileage was rated at 16/26 MPG too. They are still great contenders today and you can't beat an SBC.
Unless you have a BBC that is.
Unless you have a BBC that is.
Last edited by IZ28; Jun 4, 2003 at 09:28 PM.
Originally posted by Eric Bryant
The 5.4 L Lightning engine isn't too bad, but the Hemi? Not only is it only competitive with the 6-year-old LS1, but it requires a twin-plug head in order to get decent part-throttle/light-load combustion.
The 5.4 L Lightning engine isn't too bad, but the Hemi? Not only is it only competitive with the 6-year-old LS1, but it requires a twin-plug head in order to get decent part-throttle/light-load combustion.
Well im glad to see a lot good comments about the 3.0 Sho motor (the 3.4 V8 SUCKS). I owned 2 other sho's before the one i own now. I am not a fan of fords, but that car is just amazing. I just bought a 92 5-speed loaded with 51,000 miles on it for $3800 bucks



It gets second-glances at all the car shows.