What was Pontiac thinking?
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
GuionM: Not sure if you'd know this or not, but I have thought about this for some time from other posts you've made regarding the Firebird.
Would you know why Pontiac has always had the green light in terms of producing special editions of the Firebird? And why it had different hoods, front ends, spoilers etc., when compared to the Camaro? It just seems odd to me that if in fact the Camaro sells more than Firebird, wouldn't GM give more leeway to the Camaro?
PacerX: What you bring up is very informative, and I agree with much of what you said. So what I don't understand is, if the Firebird could return on a different platform differentiated from Camaro and wouldn't be the "same" as Camaro, then there wouldn't be a problem right?
I'll say this in parting, why is it that no one, except for a select few, gives a damn about the Firebird name itself? There's dozens of posts trying to save the Camaro name, and posts where people say they won't buy the new Chevy RWD coupe if it's not called Camaro. So why is it when anyone brings up the point of trying to save the Firebird name, it gets shot down? If you want to say it'll only steal valuable resources from the Camaro, thent that's fine. But it seems to me that people just have a complete disregard and lack of respect of what the Firebird name means to many people and what tradition it ahs as well. I don't know if it's contempt for the Firebird, but it seems like it.
Would you know why Pontiac has always had the green light in terms of producing special editions of the Firebird? And why it had different hoods, front ends, spoilers etc., when compared to the Camaro? It just seems odd to me that if in fact the Camaro sells more than Firebird, wouldn't GM give more leeway to the Camaro?
PacerX: What you bring up is very informative, and I agree with much of what you said. So what I don't understand is, if the Firebird could return on a different platform differentiated from Camaro and wouldn't be the "same" as Camaro, then there wouldn't be a problem right?
I'll say this in parting, why is it that no one, except for a select few, gives a damn about the Firebird name itself? There's dozens of posts trying to save the Camaro name, and posts where people say they won't buy the new Chevy RWD coupe if it's not called Camaro. So why is it when anyone brings up the point of trying to save the Firebird name, it gets shot down? If you want to say it'll only steal valuable resources from the Camaro, thent that's fine. But it seems to me that people just have a complete disregard and lack of respect of what the Firebird name means to many people and what tradition it ahs as well. I don't know if it's contempt for the Firebird, but it seems like it.
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
Originally Posted by GirlsRidePonies
Pontiac could never pull it off? That's a bit close minded, don't you think? what do you mean by that? And which Caddy gets the Vette's engine (out of curiosity-I don't know)?
Cadillac is at the top of the GM ladder, along with Chevrolet. Cadillac is there for two reasons:
1) Cadillac has traditionally made money.
2) Cadillac is the flagship (apart from Corvette).
Note that Cadillac got their own pseudo-Corvette off of the same platform and assembly line, a situation previously unheard of that probably sent certain folks at GM into convulsions when they heard about it...
Chevrolet gets what it wants for one reason:
They move the iron. They got what they wanted because they could sell it.
Pontiac is stuck squarely in the middle, with not much room to manuver. Chevrolet sells appliances (apart from Camaros and Corvettes and... errr... SSR's), Cadillac sells dreams. The space between appliances and dreams is pretty crowded (Mercury, Buick, Chrysler, Acura, etc...).
They call the denizens of this space "near luxury" cars. Even the dream car marketers intrude onto this space with such turds as 4 cylinder 3 series BMW's and lamed-out lowline Mercedes, Infiniti and Lexus cars.
So, what position is Pontiac in? Caught between Chevrolet and the near-luxury crowd, Pontiac has tried to tiptoe a line between a highly optioned Impala ($33,030) and a low-end CTS ($31,345).
There's a NEGATIVE margin there to fit in the entirety of Pontiac's mid to large 4-door sedan lineup (meaning Bonneville and Grand Prix).
You, as a buyer can go straight from an Impala to a Cadillac without ever stepping foot in a Pontiac dealer... and even save some cash on the Cadillac.
Does this explain Pontiac's inherent problem? Buick has the same issue... trapped between an Impala and a Cadillac.
***EDIT: Final point. Why didn't GTO get the LS6? The cost difference between the LS1 and the LS6 really isn't that impressive, the $2000 they're putting on the hood to sell them right now would cover it - AND THEY'D MOVE A LOT MORE GTO's!!!! The GTO already pays the gas-guzzler tax in automatics, who cares if the manuals do? Add to that the fact that the added LS6 volume would HELP Corvette's business case and that GTO, due to weight alone, would never threaten Corvette Z06's performance-wise.***
Originally Posted by GirlsRidePonies
Gee. I wonder what OTHER car you could apply to these...?
HINT: It starts with an "F" and ends with an "irebird".
HINT: It starts with an "F" and ends with an "irebird".
People stay loyal to brands, just like you are right now.
Harley-Davidson knows how important the brand is. The problem is that Pontiac has precious little to build that brand with, and precious little space to do it.
GTO is a baby step, Soltice is a big leap into real branding from Pontiac. For the first real time in a loooong, looong time, Pontiac finally has something that neither Chevrolet or Buick or anyone else has... unique Pontiac cars.
The last one of note was Fiero, if that indicates to you how long it has taken...
Last edited by PacerX; Jul 27, 2004 at 01:16 PM.
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
Originally Posted by Last of a Breed
PacerX: What you bring up is very informative, and I agree with much of what you said. So what I don't understand is, if the Firebird could return on a different platform differentiated from Camaro and wouldn't be the "same" as Camaro, then there wouldn't be a problem right?
They did.
It's 1/2 GTO and 1/2 Solstice.
Pontiac has effectively split the Firebird into two cars. The sporty little go fast zippy car and the powerful grand touring car.
If a Solstice and a GTO breed...
You get Firebird babies.
Originally Posted by Last of a Breed
I'll say this in parting, why is it that no one, except for a select few, gives a damn about the Firebird name itself? There's dozens of posts trying to save the Camaro name, and posts where people say they won't buy the new Chevy RWD coupe if it's not called Camaro. So why is it when anyone brings up the point of trying to save the Firebird name, it gets shot down? If you want to say it'll only steal valuable resources from the Camaro, thent that's fine. But it seems to me that people just have a complete disregard and lack of respect of what the Firebird name means to many people and what tradition it ahs as well. I don't know if it's contempt for the Firebird, but it seems like it.
This is a Camaro board.
The Firebird boards (if they're out there) will have plenty to say about the 3rd generation being so completely dominated by Chevrolet that the Camaro effectively killed the Firebird dead...
Which it did.
Fratricide through commonality.
In the end, Chevrolet killed the Firebird by making it too much like a Camaro becuase they could dominate the business case. The first deadly blow was landed prior to 1982...
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
the firebird is a higher end model than camaro it allways has been!! if you wanted to go fast and look good get camaro! but if want the same proformance and look better and more options then you get a firebird both my buddies have Z28 camaro 93' and 00' and my 00' trans am has better seats more options a better ride and just a all around better car. i'm not saying the camaro isn't a great car cause it is, but for poeple to say that pontiac gets whats left over is stupid!! take a look around everything that pontiac offers is a higer-end model then what chevy has.( except the vette )
camaro ss = trans am ws6
cavaliar = sunfire
monte carlo = grand prix
impala = bonnivlle
what about the grand prix gtp and wait five years later the impala ss and monte carlo ss that seems to me like chevy got the left overs to me!!!
the firebird and camaro died togather and need to come back togather to bring one back is dumb. i'm not looking from GM's point of view, i'm looking from a die hard f-body fan theres nothing like going out cursin witha couple Z28 and T/A's beating up on unsuspecting fords!!
camaro ss = trans am ws6
cavaliar = sunfire
monte carlo = grand prix
impala = bonnivlle
what about the grand prix gtp and wait five years later the impala ss and monte carlo ss that seems to me like chevy got the left overs to me!!!
the firebird and camaro died togather and need to come back togather to bring one back is dumb. i'm not looking from GM's point of view, i'm looking from a die hard f-body fan theres nothing like going out cursin witha couple Z28 and T/A's beating up on unsuspecting fords!!
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
I think you Firebird guys make maybe a few good observations, but the car is just not coming back because there's no business case for it, at this time. The Camaro is the more important/popular car and it's coming back hopefully. You can compare it to if Challenger fans were arguing that it should be coming back with the Charger, but it isn't, and they would know it's just not possible yet.
Last edited by IZ28; Jul 27, 2004 at 06:44 PM.
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
Originally Posted by PacerX
Take a look back at the previous years... up until 1999 Camaro is selling at a rate of 2:1 relative to Firebird.
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
Firebird as a name could actually return but NOT as the Camaro's twin. I posted about a 'hinted at' Kappa coupe that might be fitting to be named Firebird, it would have a TOTALLY different skin than Solstice. Just something to think about.
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
Originally Posted by IZ28
I think you Firebird guys make maybe a few good observations, but the car is just not coming back because there's no business case for it, at this time. The Camaro is the more important/popluar car and it's coming back hopefully. You can compare it to if Challenger fans were arguing that it should be coming back with the Charger, but it isn't, and they would know it's just not possible yet.
) Some love for the Firebird instead of the same old "It's dead, get over it, Camaro is better."
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
Originally Posted by RiceEating5.0
I'd be interested in the ratio of chevy dealers to pontiac (i'd guess 3:1??). Given the sheer number of chevy dealerships, the 2:1 ratio doesn't surprise me one bit. If anything, that should be expected.
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
Look at it THIS way, IF the Firebird name comes back, it will most likely be on a kind of car that Pontiac intended it to be in the first place. In other words, not a Camaro with some Pontiac stuff. (a sporty 2-seater instead)
Last edited by IZ28; Jul 27, 2004 at 06:47 PM.
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
PacerX: Great posts. You've earned some respect from me. I very much agree with alot of what you've said, and it's nice you can back it up. I saw a GTO the other day.
They actually aren't bad looking.
And I love Firebird, but right now there is NO business case to bring it back. If the Camaro comes back (or should I say when???) there will be a much, much better case. And it'll be better than ever.
The Firebird has always been the Yin to the Camaro's yang, and I can't wait to see those days come back.
I'm shooting for 2012.
They actually aren't bad looking.
And I love Firebird, but right now there is NO business case to bring it back. If the Camaro comes back (or should I say when???) there will be a much, much better case. And it'll be better than ever.
The Firebird has always been the Yin to the Camaro's yang, and I can't wait to see those days come back.
I'm shooting for 2012.
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
Originally Posted by RiceEating5.0
I'd be interested in the ratio of chevy dealers to pontiac (i'd guess 3:1??). Given the sheer number of chevy dealerships, the 2:1 ratio doesn't surprise me one bit. If anything, that should be expected.
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
Originally Posted by GirlsRidePonies
And I love Firebird, but right now there is NO business case to bring it back. If the Camaro comes back (or should I say when???) there will be a much, much better case. And it'll be better than ever.
The Firebird has always been the Yin to the Camaro's yang, and I can't wait to see those days come back.
I'm shooting for 2012.
The Firebird has always been the Yin to the Camaro's yang, and I can't wait to see those days come back.
I'm shooting for 2012.
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
Originally Posted by morb|d
why don't we stop to think why there are more Chevy dealers? oh yeah, it's because THEY SELL MORE CARS. catch 22.
Shouldn’t they be “expected” to sell in smaller volumes? It should be no surprise. It all goes hand in hand. They sell more cars because they are much larger, and they are much larger because of the more abundant dealership base. 30,000 firebird sales seem poor to some (and it is), but chevy on the other hand only manages 10,000 more with close to twice the dealerships. Chevy moves 30,000 some vettes in the same showrooms as 40,000 camaros. So in retrospective, firebird sales weren't really poorer than camaro sales imo.
Re: What was Pontiac thinking?
Originally Posted by morb|d
now you see what we've seen for a while now. great to have you aboard. just wish it didn't take all this drama to break in the newbies.


